AI Adoption in Education Slows, Becomes More Intentional: Quizlet Report

Enhancing learning with AI and human educators - ExBulletin

In the field of education, the integration of technology, particularly artificial intelligence (AI), with traditional human-led instruction is becoming increasingly important and debated. As educators and technologists, we must critically evaluate the strengths and limitations of both AI and human educators to optimize educational outcomes. By examining the pros and cons of AI-assisted instruction versus human teacher instruction, a hybrid model emerges that leverages the best of both worlds to maximize learning and knowledge retention. The benefits and limitations of AI in education AI in education offers numerous benefits including personalization, accessibility, and scalability. AI is excellent at analysing extensive data on student performance to tailor educational content to individual learning pace and style, providing personalized learning experiences that have the potential to increase engagement and effectiveness. One of the most transformative aspects of integrating AI into education is its potential to improve educational equity. By providing resources that were traditionally only available to students in well-resourced schools, AI can bridge the gap between diverse educational environments, including students in remote areas or with special needs who would otherwise not have access to human educators. For example, AI-driven platforms can provide personalized tutoring sessions, language translation services, and adaptive learning paths to students with different backgrounds and learning abilities. Democratizing access significantly levels the playing field, ensuring every student has the opportunity to succeed, regardless of socio-economic status or geographic location. Moreover, AI can help thousands of students simultaneously, providing consistent educational quality across a range of subjects without fatigue. But AI-powered instruction also has limitations. AI lacks emotional intelligence and often struggles to interact empathetically, motivate students during difficult times, or adjust its teaching style based on emotional cues. While AI-powered content generation is useful, it often lacks the creativity and nuanced explanations that skilled educators provide, which are essential for teaching complex or abstract concepts. Additionally, the use of AI in education raises significant ethical issues, including concerns about data privacy and potential algorithmic bias. Strengths of human educators and teachers Challenges Human educators are unparalleled in their ability to provide emotional support and foster an environment that encourages social learning. They excel at motivating students, managing classroom dynamics, and providing individualized feedback based on nuanced observations. Teachers' adaptability and creativity allow them to dynamically change instructional strategies and provide creative, context-rich explanations that resonate with diverse groups of students. Moreover, human interaction plays a vital role in instilling values and ethics in students, an area where AI cannot contribute effectively. Despite these strengths, human educators face several challenges, including scalability issues and variability in the quality of instruction. Human resources are limited and educators can only engage with a limited number of students at a time, which can affect the consistency and scope of instructional delivery. Furthermore, the quality of instruction is influenced by factors such as training, experience, and personal characteristics and can vary significantly between educators. Hybrid model proposal To maximize the benefits of both AI and human educators, a hybrid approach is recommended. AI should be used as a support tool to handle administrative tasks such as grading and scheduling, and to provide supplemental personalized learning aids such as simulations and adaptive quizzes. Human educators should remain the primary facilitators of learning, using their unique skills to deliver complex content, inspire students, and build relationships. Curricula should be designed to seamlessly integrate AI tools with human-led sessions and enhance interactivity and engagement through multimedia resources and real-time analytics. The aim of this hybrid model is to create a more inclusive, efficient, and effective education system that not only imparts knowledge but also fosters a holistic developmental environment. The future of education does not lie in choosing between AI and human educators, but in effectively integrating the two to serve the diverse needs of students. By adopting a balanced approach, we can create a more inclusive, efficient, and effective education system that not only imparts knowledge but also fosters a holistic developmental environment that prepares students to succeed in an increasingly complex world. Nyong Ma, numbered Nhon Ma is the CEO of Numerade, a company dedicated to transforming education through technology. Under his leadership, Numerade develops innovative educational tools that blend AI and human expertise to deliver high-quality educational experiences to students around the world. Latest Posts by eSchool Media Contributors (View All) What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

Quizlet Reports Pace Of AI Adoption Slowing, Becoming More Intentional

Quizlet released its Second Annual State of AI in Education report exploring AI implementation, perception, and impact from the perspectives of teachers and students at the college and high school levels. The findings show that as generative AI tools have become ubiquitous in schools, initial feelings of naïve optimism and impending doom have given way to more pragmatic assessments of AI's potential. The hard work of determining the tools can be integrated into the educational establishment to advance specific learning goals. The 2023-24 academic year marked the second full year that students, teachers, and administrators had access to generative AI solutions. College students have been much quicker in adopting this technology than their high school counterparts, with more than four out of five (82%) college students reporting using AI technology, compared to just 58% of high school students. College students also report that their institutions are much more likely (41%) to have established codes of conduct regarding AI use than high schools (18%). Meghann Lomas, senior director of Product at Quizlet, remarked, "College students are adopting AI at a rapid pace, illustrating that this technology isn't a trend but rather a profound shift in how they learn and engage with the curriculum. Students want to use AI responsibly, and guidance from educators, administrators, and the tech companies building these solutions can help them." One of the challenges facing teachers and students wishing to employ AI tools is the lack of clear guidelines on what is acceptable. High school teachers are more likely to be approached by their students with general questions about permission (67% vs. 52%), while college teachers are more likely to be asked about specific use (59% vs. 40%). This data suggests that students are intentional in their use of AI and understand the limitations of acceptability. The lack of clear guidelines on AI usage remains a primary concern for teachers, with 49% identifying it as a significant concern. Scant progress has been made over the past year on deploying clear codes of conduct, with 69% of respondents on the 2024 survey identifying this as a program, down only slightly from 72% reporting the same in 2023. When asked who they would trust the most to create guidelines, the top 3 responses were schools/school districts (65%), state/federal governments (34%), and technology companies (31%)-suggesting that there is little consensus over where the guidance should come. The State of AI in Education report shows that there is less of a rush to the future by educators and more of a slow march through the process of figuring out AI's value for education and how it can contribute. Optimism about AI's potential has decreased along with the corresponding fears. While 51% of teachers in 2023 thought the impact of AI would be positive, in 2024, the number had fallen to 38%. That said, roughly half of teachers felt that AI had made students more confident and had helped them learn concepts faster. "Both students and teachers report that AI hasn't yet resulted in a massive sea change for education," said Lomas. "But more incremental changes are a good sign. It means that the most important stakeholders in education, teachers and students, have a better understanding of how to deploy AI practically, which builds on the foundation of education." The report shows that teachers are taking it upon themselves to discuss proper AI use with their students, with almost half now discussing it with their classes and over a third actively teaching students how to use it. The jury is still out on whether the proliferation of AI is improving the underlying learning. In the survey, only 28% of teachers (46% of students) said that AI technologies positively impacted learning. It is clear that the introduction of generative AI has been necessarily transformative, especially in terms of its impact on assignments and assessments. An essay assignment given as a writing prompt was once a perfectly sound way to assess a student's writing ability. With generative AI, this changes. If producing an essay is as easy as entering a writing prompt, some students will inevitably take the shortcut. English teachers must change their instructional practice just as calculators and spreadsheets force mathematics teachers to do the same. Giving students a long list of numbers to add by hand may once have been good practice for their arithmetical skills; these days, such an exercise is more likely to test their keyboarding accuracy. In the same way, while clear grammar and accurate spelling may have once suggested depth of understanding, today, their absence more likely indicates laziness regarding using the tools available inside any word processor. The presence of technology necessitates a change in the practice of students and teachers. The fact that the GPT can make the production of a paragraph or an essay a simple task is similar to the impact that calculators or spreadsheets had on numerical exercises in the past. These tools do not prevent the need for teaching; they transform what needs to be learned. Quizlet's Second Annual State of AI in Education report is an important barometer on AI and its use in secondary and tertiary education. Over time, the insights shared in these reports should deepen. Quizlet is a compelling source of insight into the use of AI agents in education because it occupies a middle ground between students and teachers. Quizlet is not simply a document production tool used to complete assignments but is an actual learning tool. By capturing information about how it is used as a tool, Quizlet can gain insight into a learning process where the goal is the actual attainment of skills or knowledge and not merely the production of a document to demonstrate that learning has occurred. This is where the most significant potential for the effective use of AI resides, as a tool that can observe and evaluate the learning process, gaining insight into how students learn and ultimately helping them become self-learners. To learn more about this and other topics that help teachers navigate the ever-evolving landscape of education and technology, register for Quizlet's Unconference on July 23rd.