Curated by THEOUTPOST
On Fri, 23 Aug, 12:01 AM UTC
3 Sources
[1]
The rise and fall of America's AI mayoral candidate -- and OpenAI's mad dash to shut it down
If elected mayor, Victor Miller, 42, told voters he would govern Cheyenne, Wyoming, a town of just shy of 65,000 residents, via an AI chatbot modeled on OpenAI's GPT-4. He named the chatbot, which he built himself, VIC, standing for Virtual Integrated Citizen; Miller himself pledged to serve as a "meat avatar" carrying out VIC's duties. On Tuesday, 11,036 Laramie County residents cast votes for mayor; Miller and VIC (or VIC and Miller) received 327. The winner was second-term incumbent Patrick Collins, who received 6,286 votes. "I'm really heartened by the response I did get from the people who voted for me," Miller told Fortune. "I only have a handful of family and friends, so the majority of those people are just real voters who don't know me." In a tweeted statement late Tuesday night, Miller conceded his loss. "As the first person to put artificial intelligence directly on the ballot, offering voters the novel choice of AI governance, our campaign has marked a historic moment in politics and technology," he wrote. While "we" lost the election, he went on, "we've achieved something remarkable: we've introduced the world to a new paradigm of governance and sparked crucial discussions about the role of AI in public administration." It was an uphill battle from the start for Miller and VIC, and the drama of his candidacy sent shockwaves through the local government. Earlier this summer, the county of Laramie was quick to clarify that, contrary to the denizens of national news outlets claiming otherwise, an AI bot was not actually on the ballot. "Victor Miller, through countless interviews and statements ... has consistently maintained a distinction between himself as a 'meat avatar' and separate from the AI-program he chooses to call VIC," Laramie County Clerk Debra Lee wrote in a July 5 press release. "To allow VIC to be listed as a candidate would both violate Wyoming law and create voter confusion. VIC is not a registered voter. Therefore, VIC cannot run for office in Wyoming and the name does not appear on Laramie County's official ballot." Originally, VIC's name was on the ballot rather than Miller's. But that didn't last long; in June, Wyoming Secretary of State Chuck Gray sent a letter to Cheyenne's county clerk outlining their views on Miller's candidacy. "In Wyoming law, it's the municipal clerk, not the secretary of state, who certifies candidates," Gray told Fortune. "Our office is tasked with ensuring uniform application of the election code, which is title 22." Wyoming's law is clear, he said. "To run for office, one must be a quote-unquote qualified elector. That necessitates being a real person." Gray said he was first alerted to Miller's candidacy via a complaint that came through his office; he did not specify who complained, but said it was not another mayoral candidate. Gray spoke with Fortune on Wednesday, a day after the election was called for incumbent Patrick Collins. Miller came in fourth place. "The AI bot message did not resonate with voters," Gray said. Miller is a libertarian; Gray, meanwhile, is a staunch republican who said "our laws have to mean something." Gray called Miller's candidacy "unprecedented and very disturbing." Mayor Collins did not return multiple requests for comment. ("There was no need for all that," Miller told Fortune of Gray's investigation. "It kind of showcases the downsides of having humans in positions of state power.") OpenAI, which powered VIC, shut down access in June, CNN reported; an OpenAI spokesperson said Miller's actions violated its terms of usage, as ChatGPT is not meant for political campaigning. At the time, Miller told Wired that if OpenAI took VIC access from him, he'd simply move to Meta's open-source AI offering, Llama 3. But after OpenAI shut VIC down, Miller worked quickly to assemble VIC 2.0 on the same service, which worked identically. "OpenAI has forced me to become a freedom fighter in the open-source battle," Miller told Fortune. "And VIC 2.0 is still functional. Sam Altman has not found me in the dark corridors of OpenAI just yet." In his concession note Tuesday, Miller announced plans to develop a new organization called the Rational Governance Alliance, which he said will build off his campaign's main idea: putting AI in the decision room. Ideally, the group will "create a framework where AI can take on the full responsibility of decision-making in public office, with humans serving as the legal and physical intermediaries required by current systems." In other words, future AI candidates won't have to go it alone the way Miller did. "To all who believe that the era of traditional politicians has reached its limit, I extend an invitation to join us in ushering in a new age of rational governance," Miller wrote. "The time has come to move beyond the constraints of human bias and self-interest in public office." Managing the alliance would be a bit of a career change. Miller works for the local library in Cheyenne, both on the facilities and grounds crew as well as on the computer crew, helping patrons with their day-to-day tech woes. "I've always been a tech and computer guy -- an early adopter when things were coming out," he told Fortune the day after conceding the race. His first brush with LLMs came a few years ago when he fed his resume to ChatGPT with a command to improve upon it, which it did. "I thought, okay, this isn't just a parlor trick anymore," he said. "It's a real thing that can help us in the real world." Running for mayor alongside VIC was a nexus of Miller's two primary interests, he said: becoming more literate in AI for his own purposes, and demanding the government become more responsive (he cited a recent Sisyphean effort to access public records from the state ombudsman). "I see a lot of people in my life who tech has really left behind, so I always have that in the back of my mind," Miller said. "I'm trying not to let that happen to me." He said VIC prioritizes transparency and openness -- and bringing prosperity to Cheyenne. Trusting human politicians to have those same values, Miller said, is like "believing in the tooth fairy or Santa Claus." (The 2024 presidential election is the "perfect showcase" of such dysfunctions. "The DNC is a total clown show," he said.) Asked about VIC's politics, he shrugged. "Kind of what you'd expect," he said. "It's a mainstream OpenAI model; the literature on that tends to say it leans a little left coming out of Silicon Valley. Pretty pragmatic and centrist." Noting similarities between VIC's ideals and Miller's, Fortune asked why he didn't simply run himself -- rather than work as a "meat avatar." Miller said he thinks he's just as much part of the problem. The human-run political system, as he sees it, is in its twilight, like monarchies and feudalism. On the horizon: the era of AI governance that "will bring prosperity -- and hopefully peace." After all, that's why Miller's apolitical. "Obama got me, Trump got me, they all got me," he said. "AI got me too." A pause. "I hope they don't let me down."
[2]
This small-town Wyoming election could give us a preview of the future of AI in politics
Welcome to AI Decoded, Fast Company's weekly newsletter that breaks down the most important news in the world of AI. You can sign up to receive this newsletter every week here. The Wyoming mayoral candidate who wants AI to run the city may be a pioneer, not a joke In Cheyenne, Wyoming, a mayoral candidate named Victor Miller is basing his candidacy on the idea of letting an AI bot run the local government. He says the bot, called Vic (Virtual Integrated Citizen), can digest mountains of data and make unbiased decisions, and may be capable of proposing novel solutions to previously intractable resource-distribution problems. Miller says he would make sure the bot's actions are "legally and practically executed." Experts say that Miller's AI-fueled candidacy is a first of its kind in the U.S. It sounds crazy, until you consider the context. According to a 2023 Gallup poll, Americans' confidence in government has hit historic lows and is heading downward. Some of that erosion of trust is owed to government waste and administrative failure (see: the Veterans Administration's woes). Maybe AI could make operations run more smoothly and restore some of that trust. To be sure, AI is already helping the government. Washington Post AI reporter Josh Tyrangiel pointed out in May that when the government really needed to quickly create and distribute a COVID vaccine, it turned to the AI platform Palantir to speed along the process by organizing and analyzing the data. The intelligence community relies heavily on Palantir to make sense of the myriad streams of intelligence data coming in from all over the world. The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) recently said it will use OpenAI's ChatGPT Enterprise to help new and local aid organizations it partners with. Tyrangiel argues that the government could use AI bots to answer the public's questions about taxes, healthcare benefits, and student loans.
[3]
A mayor promised to govern through AI in the United States: He has lost the election - Softonic
Victor Miller proposed a personalized ChatGPT bot to govern Cheyenne (Wyoming), but he did not do well in the election A candidate for the mayorship of Wyoming who proposed letting an artificial intelligence bot run the local government lost his mayoral race last Tuesday, and by a wide margin. It seems that the promises of AI are losing strength, as it did in the United Kingdom a few months ago. The candidate, Victor Miller, announced his candidacy for the mayor of Cheyenne earlier this year, and quickly made headlines after deciding to run with his customized ChatGPT bot, named Vic (Virtual Integrated Citizen), and declaring his intention to govern in a hybrid format, which experts say was a first in American political campaigns. Before Tuesday's elections, the AI bot explained to the local television, Your Wyoming Link, that its role in the government would be to provide data-based ideas and innovative solutions for Cheyenne, while Miller would serve as the official mayor if elected by the voters and ensure that "all actions are carried out legally and practically." On Tuesday night, Miller admitted his defeat and stated that the campaign was not about him as a candidate, but about "offering voters an innovative choice: the possibility of electing an AI that would make 100% of the decisions in office." And he added that his role was "simply that of the necessary human interface to bring this new form of intelligence to the ballot box, since current laws do not allow AI to run independently." So, Miller decided to pass the buck to someone with a "let's see, if I didn't run in the elections, the bot would. He's the one who lost." Despite his poor result at the polls, Miller said of his collaboration with the robot: "The seeds of a revolution in governance have been planted, and they are already starting to sprout." We understand that by sprouting he means that it has begun to irreversibly decompose. People don't trust AI in general, with millions of layoffs worldwide due to the implementation of these tools, let alone wanting it to govern your town. It doesn't seem like a very desirable future.
Share
Share
Copy Link
Victor Miller, a mayoral candidate in Cheyenne, Wyoming, who promised to govern with AI assistance, loses the election. The campaign raises questions about the role of AI in politics and governance.
In a groundbreaking campaign that caught national attention, Victor Miller, a 29-year-old mayoral candidate in Cheyenne, Wyoming, pledged to govern the city with the assistance of artificial intelligence, specifically OpenAI's GPT-4 language model. Despite the innovative approach, Miller ultimately lost the election, securing only 4% of the vote 1.
Miller's campaign centered around the promise to use AI as a tool for decision-making and policy formulation. He proposed using GPT-4 to analyze vast amounts of data, generate policy ideas, and even draft legislation. This approach, Miller argued, would lead to more efficient and data-driven governance 2.
Despite the innovative nature of Miller's campaign, voters in Cheyenne seemed hesitant to embrace AI-assisted governance. The election results suggest that traditional approaches to local politics still hold sway in the community. Some voters expressed concerns about the potential loss of human touch in governance and the reliability of AI-generated policies 3.
While Miller's campaign was unsuccessful, it has sparked a broader conversation about the role of AI in politics and governance. Proponents argue that AI could enhance decision-making processes and improve efficiency in government operations. Critics, however, worry about the potential for AI to exacerbate existing biases or make decisions without proper context 2.
Despite the election loss, Miller remains optimistic about the potential of AI in governance. He believes that as AI technology continues to advance, its integration into political processes will become more common and accepted. The Cheyenne mayoral race may be seen as an early experiment in what could become a more widespread trend 1.
The campaign has raised important questions about the ethical implications of AI in governance. Issues such as transparency, accountability, and the balance between human judgment and machine-generated insights will need to be addressed as AI continues to play a larger role in various aspects of society, including politics 2.
Miller's campaign, while unsuccessful, has provided valuable insights into public perception of AI in governance. It highlights the need for better education about AI capabilities and limitations, as well as the importance of addressing concerns about AI's role in decision-making processes that affect communities 3.
Reference
[1]
[2]
Despite predictions of AI significantly influencing elections in 2023, its impact was less dramatic than anticipated. This story explores the actual role of AI in recent elections and the ongoing concerns about its potential future effects.
2 Sources
2 Sources
Independent candidate Bentley Hensel creates an AI chatbot to represent incumbent Don Beyer in a congressional debate, raising questions about AI's role in politics and election integrity.
4 Sources
4 Sources
A comprehensive look at how AI technologies were utilized in the 2024 global elections, highlighting both positive applications and potential risks.
4 Sources
4 Sources
OpenAI secures a historic $6 billion in funding, valuing the company at $157 billion. This massive investment comes amid concerns about AI safety, regulation, and the company's ability to deliver on its ambitious promises.
7 Sources
7 Sources
A philosophical exploration of three possible scenarios for integrating AI into politics, including chatbot politicians, AI-powered direct democracy, and algocracy, highlighting both the potential benefits and challenges of each approach.
2 Sources
2 Sources
The Outpost is a comprehensive collection of curated artificial intelligence software tools that cater to the needs of small business owners, bloggers, artists, musicians, entrepreneurs, marketers, writers, and researchers.
© 2025 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved