Canon's Latest Mirrorless Marvels: EOS R5 II and EOS R1 Shake Up the Camera Market

Hands on: Canon EOS R5 II review - a polished upgrade

How do you improve on one of the outright best cameras, the EOS R5? By making its successor quicker in just about every regard, which is what Canon has managed to do with the new Canon EOS R5 II. It's a versatile professional camera that captures high-resolution 45MP stills and 8K video like the EOS R5, but with a few new features under the hood that improve overall performance, and an impressive array of video features and high-speed modes. The sensor resolution stays at 45MP, but it's now a stacked sensor with faster readout that should eliminate rolling shutter distortion, as on the Nikon Z8. Canon says the EOS R5 II (and new flagship EOS R1) boast the fastest sensor readout speed on the market. We also get what Canon calls a 'DIGIC Accelerator' - which is effectively a new second processor to bolster the DIGIC X and deliver faster processing speeds, resulting in faster burst-shooting speeds, now up to 30fps, that can be sustained for longer, with pre-recording up to 15 frames. Another major new feature for the line is Eye Control AF (as used in the EOS R3) and the latest version of Canon's Dual Pixel Intelligent AF system, now equipped with what Canon calls deep learning and specific Action Priority modes including basketball, football, and volleyball. The autofocus system is able to recognize and store specific faces and body postures, and predict movement to focus sharply on what's important in the frame. You could be forgiven for thinking that these new features sound like they should be in a pro sports camera, like the pricier EOS R1 announced on the same day; and indeed they are, so it's majorly impressive that Canon has also added them to a cheaper, all-purpose professional camera like the EOS R5 II. Canon needed to add in these improvements really, because how else could it improve on the four-year-old EOS R5, a camera which has stood the test of time and remains one of the best cameras for photography? For a certain type of photographer, though, the EOS R5 II is overkill, and the EOS R5 will do just fine: landscape and portrait photographers, stand down. But if you ever shoot action, or would like a better-equipped video camera, then the EOS R5 II steps in. It's a faster camera in every way, impressively tracking subjects in high-speed action scenarios. However, I didn't have the older model to compare just how much faster and reliable the EOS R5 II is for action, impressive as the new AF modes appear to be. Image stabilization performance has, at least on paper, been improved too, while there are some intriguing new in-camera AI-powered image-editing tools, of which more later. Outwardly the EOS R5 II has changed little compared to its predecessor, although I was pleased to see new cooling vents on the underside of the EOS R5 II to minimize overheating, which was a well-publicized criticism of the EOS R5. There are also not one, nor two, but three optional vertical grip accessories to choose from, one of which includes a cooling fan to extend video record times. There's lots to talk about in the new model, but I've only had a day with a beta version of the EOS R5 II, and I'm still working on a more in-depth full review. For now, my first impressions are highly positive, and the Canon EOS R5 II could be the new full-frame mirrorless camera to beat. The Canon EOS R5 II launches with a body-only price of $4,499 / £4,499 / AU$6,699, which is around 10% more than the launch price of the EOS R5. The price difference feels about right allowing for inflation and the new features on offer, although it would have been nice to see it priced a little closer to the EOS R5's launch price to better compete with the Nikon Z8. You can also pick up the EOS R5 II with the 24-105mm F4L lens for $5,699 / £5,799.99 / AU$8,549. The EOS R5 II is set to be available from August 2024, and there will be no fewer than three optional grips to choose from (prices TBC), which is a first. The Cooling Fan grip improves video record times, but lacks the vertical grip control layout which you can find in the Battery Grip that can extend battery life. Canon hasn't tinkered too much with the EOS R5 II design compared to its predecessor, and that's a wise move. It weighs just 26.3oz / 746g, and is a smaller camera than the Nikon Z8 - it's more in line with a Sony A7R V - though you can beef it up with an optional grip to improve the balance with larger lenses. Nonetheless, the EOS R5 II is comfortable in the hand over long sessions shooting with pro lenses, like the 24-70mm F2.8L that I used for most of this hands-on review. Familiar it may be, the EOS R5 II actually has a few refinements over the EOS R5. The 5.76m-dot viewfinder is new: Canon says it's twice as bright, and it's blackout-free and equipped with Eye Control autofocus that's twice as responsive as on the EOS R3. If you haven't tried Eye Control AF before, let me tell you: it's brilliant. It tracks your eye as you scan the scene through the viewfinder, and moves the focus point accordingly, pinpointed to where you're looking in the frame. I initiated the autofocus function with two presets: one for horizontal shooting and the other for vertical, and the EOS R5 II had no problem recognizing my eye. In use, it performed really well, especially in tandem with subject-tracking autofocus. Build quality is excellent, with a magnesium alloy chassis, weather-sealed exterior, and robust controls. However, I was also testing the new EOS R1 at the same time as the EOS R5 II, and to me the pro sports model had a better feel overall. For example, the control wheel on the EOS R1's rear is nicely dampened and rotates smoothly, making the wheel on the EOS R5 II feel cheaper by comparison. Filmmakers will appreciate the fact that the EOS R5 II has a full-size HMDI port (the EOS R5 doesn't) and a tally lamp to indicate when you're recording, and key info, such as waveform monitor, can be displayed on-screen. There are also cooling vents on the camera's underside. We don't have official information as to how much these vents alone improve the EOS R5II's ability to stay cool under heavy use. However, they do work with the optional Cooling Fan grip, and with this installed Canon says you'll get over 120 minutes of continuous video record time without overheating; and Canon will certainly want to avoid any of the overheating dramas that dogged the EOS R5. Otherwise the EOS R5 II is standard fare for a camera at this price range. You get a typical array of controls that are well laid out, a back-illuminated top-LCD, an AF joystick on the rear, control dials for quick exposure changes, and twin card slots; there's one CFexpress Type B and one SD, and you'll need the former, which is the faster (and pricier) card type, to make the most of the EOS R5 II's high-speed features. Naturally, there are both mic and headphone ports, plus USB-C for charging. The battery is the existing LP-E6P unit, which delivers up to 640 shots on a full charge, although that number will be a lot higher if you're capturing lots of high-speed bursts. I had the opportunity to put the EOS R5 II through its paces in various high-speed scenarios, including basketball and breakdancing, rattling off thousands of frames over a relatively short period. If you're going to be using the EOS R5 II for action you'll want to utilize the faster CFexpress Type B memory card. I was getting fairly short 30fps sequences when using an SD card, and the camera was getting a little warm to touch under heavy use (though that didn't affect performance). CFexpress Type B, on the other hand, lets you shoot for much longer - I'll confirm the numbers in my full review. Pre-recording is new for the R5 line, and by half-pressing the shutter you can have up to 15 frames prepped before you fully press the shutter - that's up to half a second of additional time to react to the action and start shooting. In an interview following the hands-on sessions, I put Canon's Product Marketing Manager, John Maurice, firmly on the spot by asking what is the one most notable improvement in the EOS R5 II over the EOS R5. He replied autofocus performance. Put simply, Canon says the EOS R5 II's autofocus is more intelligent than the EOS R5. The 'intelligent' part of Canon's refined Dual Pixel Intelligent AF system refers to deep learning technology, coloquially called AI autofocus. There's plenty to get to grips with here: for one, the EOS R5 II can register people and then if that person's face is recognized they take priority, plus you get the option to quickly select through multiple registered peoples for autofocus tracking using the AF joystick. The EOS R5 II can store up to 10 people, ideal for prioritizing the players of one football team, while if you're a wedding photographer being able to prioritize the bride and groom among many people would be super handy. There's also three Action Priority sports modes covering football, basketball and volleyball. Canon says the EOS R5 II recognizes which player has the ball and can prioritize that person, plus it knows various key sporting moves to prioritize, such as a volleyball player spiking. Intelligent autofocus all sounds highly impressive, but is it any good? I had basketball as a test scenario and, once I started getting to grips with the best settings, was getting virtually every photo in sharp focus where I wanted it. I can't be sure yet if that success is specifically down to choosing the 'correct' autofocus mode; was it better with Eye Control AF; would I get the same results using the 'incorrect' setting? I'll do more testing with a full production model to find out for sure. But the bottom line is my hit ratio of sharp action photos has been staggeringly high. With speed being the name of the EOS R5 II upgrade game, and the same 45MP resolution as the EOS R5, you'd be forgiven for thinking that image quality is essentially the same despite there being four years between models. That might be true for single-shot photography in good light, but the quicker processor and sensor have a knock-on effect for image quality in high-speed scenarios. For example, the stacked sensor minimizes the rolling shutter distortion that can distort movement in photos and videos, by up to 40% Canon says. I tried the new in-camera upscaling and Neural Network noise reduction functions, too. Upscaling works on an existing image quadrupling its resolution, and when you're shooting 45MP stills already, that's a final 180MP image, or 16384x10928 pixels. Huge. Canon says upscaling is better than the high-res shot mode found in other cameras, which effectively does the same thing but by another means: using pixel shift and rapidly shooting multiple images that are then combined into one larger image. The problem with high-res shot mode is that images are taken sequentially and if there's any movement during those shots then you get a ghosting effect. Upscaling has no such problem: it's increasing the size of a photo that you've already taken. I used the upscaling on a portrait and for an image in which the subject only took up a small portion of the frame, with the idea of enlarging it to the crop in for a better composition. AI-upscaling does a decent job. It's not perfect though: there's a sort of processed look to upscaled photos when you're pixel peeping. The same can be said for the new Neural Network noise reduction, which can be applied to JPEG images in-camera. However, these images were shot on pre-production Canon beta sample model, so final image quality may vary. The potential of this tool in quadrupling the number of pixels is huge, if it can be applied effectively. There's a great variety of video codes and frame rates which makes the EOS R5 II a more versatile tool for filmmakers than the EOS R5. You get 8K 60fps raw video (onto CFexpress Type B card, not SD), 4K up to 120fps in 10-bit and even 240fps in 2K. What's missing here is open gate recording, which for now remains a trump card for Panasonic and Blackmagic video cameras. With a generous 8K video resolution to play with, it seems like a missed opportunity to go up one on Sony and Nikon by offering open gate - which means recording from the full height and width of the sensor. We're instead limited to 16:9 and cropping into that frame for other aspect ratios used for social. We'll be sure to run further image and video quality tests in a full review. My time with the Canon EOS R5 II was brief: just a day's session, when I also had the Canon EOS R1. It was also a pre production beta sample and so final image quality and performance may vary in finalized samples. However, I was given decent scenarios and lenses to use with both cameras to put them through their paces. There were two sports scenarios: basketball and breakdancing, both indoors. Another indoor setup involved a skilled cocktail maker, plus an outdoor session with models and classic German automobiles. I was armed with the RF 24-70mm F2.8L and RF 85mm F1.2L lenses. I had time after the shoot day to further familiarize myself with the camera and run some speed tests. Tests involved using the various burst modes and video capture to see how the EOS R5 II fared in heavy use, plus checking out the new in-camera AI-editing tools.

Canon R1 hands-on: Incredible speed but 24MP resolution may disappoint

Canon has unveiled its most important camera in years -- the EOS R1 mirrorless. Launched alongside the 45-megapixel R5 II, it's the company's new flagship designed to replace the 1DX Mark III DSLR and help Canon maintain its leadership in the pro sports photography field. The R1 is all about speed, with the stacked sensor allowing 40 fps RAW bursts with continuous autofocus. Other features are designed to help nail crucial shots, including pre-capture, eye-tracking AF and sports-specific settings. At the same time, it should be great for video, thanks to its support for 6K RAW capture. One potential downside is the 24-megapixel resolution, which is lower than rivals like Sony's A1 and the Nikon Z9. To see how that affected image quality and gather some impressions on performance and new features, I was able to get a short amount of hands-on time with the R1 in Phoenix, Arizona. Though massive for a mirrorless camera, the R1 is lighter than it looks -- it only weighs 2.12 pounds. The magnesium alloy body is dust- and water-resistant and the large, comfortable grip uses new rubber to reduce slippage. It's a stable platform, even with telephoto lenses, and was clearly designed for working photographers. Controls are laid out much like the EOS R3, with two control dials, a rear dial, joystick, mode switch and many customizable buttons. It has matching vertical controls, with the same layout in portrait and landscape modes. Canon did add a touch-sensitive IR button called the smart controller, which offers three ways to adjust autofocus. Overall, the R1 handles like an F1 car -- fast and reactive, but there's a steep learning curve. The viewfinder is Canon's best yet with 9.44 million dots, 0.9 times magnification and 3x brightness, all tops in the EOS series. The rear display fully articulates for high- and low-angle shooting. Canon decided to ditch SD cards in favor of two CFexpress type B slots. That allows for maximum RAW burst speeds, as well as fast and reliable backups, but you'll end up throwing your SD card collection out the window. By contrast, Sony's R1 has dual card slots for both SD UHS II and CFexpress type A. The R1 uses a variant of the battery from the EOS R3 that supports up to 650 shots and 70 minutes of 6K video on a charge. Connectivity is the best I've seen on any Canon camera, with Wi-Fi 6E, ethernet, USB-C PD and more. The R1 is built for action and suffice to say, it's fast. In blackout free electronic shutter mode, you can shoot JPEG and RAW frames at up to 40 fps for a long while before the massive buffer fills -- with Canon promising "1,000 or more" shots when shooting uncompressed RAW and JPEG files. It hits 12 fps with the mechanical shutter, a feature missing on Nikon's rival Z9. The latter isn't usually necessary, though, as the stacked shutter largely eliminates rolling shutter distortion. Canon is bringing numerous autofocus improvements as well. With regular single-point tracking, you can change the target with either the joystick or smart controller. In addition, the R1 has a new eye-tracking system called Eye AF II, a more sophisticated version of its Eye Control AF from the R3. As with the R3, you must calibrate Eye AF II first. And it won't necessarily function well for all eye types, but it worked great for me, as the tracking box followed my gaze with less drift than before. That didn't always translate to sharp photos, but again, I was using a pre-production unit. Of course the R1 offers face- and eye-detection for both humans and animals. But what happens if you're trying to single out someone in a crowd of players? First off, there are now AI modes for three specific sports, volleyball, basketball and soccer. The idea is that the system will track action around the ball to help you nail key shots. It's also supposed to stay locked on a player even in traffic. Finally, you can register up to 10 faces to keep track of a whole team of athletes. How well does this work? It's hard to say in the short time I had the camera, but I didn't notice a dramatic improvement with chaotic action or specific sports. But these features require time to master, so a full review will tell me more. Another new feature to help pros avoid missing shots is pre-continuous shooting, something that's seen on many high-end cameras these days. The R1 starts taking photos when you half-press the shutter button, recording up to the last 20 frames once it's fully pressed. Canon has led the way in image stabilization since the R5, and the R1 offers a solid 8.5 stops of shake reduction with supported lenses. This isn't necessarily a great benefit for action shooting, but it does help with landscapes or low-light shooting. Canon likely anticipated complaints about the relatively low 24-megapixel resolution. In response, it unveiled a new feature called in-camera upscaling. It uses deep learning to quadruple image size to 96 megapixels in-camera after shooting, supposedly while maintaining apparent resolution. This is different from Sony's pixel-shift scheme that takes multiple separate photos and merges them into one. However, it was hard to get a straight answer from Canon as to how exactly the upscaling works. Obviously, it can't be a true resolution increase without actually capturing extra pixels. Image quality is difficult to judge in pre-production cameras, and Canon specifically said that in-camera RAW processing was a work in progress. Nonetheless, JPEGs looked sharp out of the camera and had the company's typically excellent skin tones. Low-light image quality is a selling point of this camera, and it did appear to perform well at high ISOs, with decent image quality at ISO 12,800 and beyond. However, it's no Sony A7S III at very high ISOs, so the max of ISO 102,400 is for emergency use only. Stacked sensor cameras tend to sacrifice some dynamic range in favor of speed, but there's no sign of that with the R1. However, I'll need more time to get a full idea of RAW image quality, particularly at high ISOs. Though mainly aimed at photographers, the R1 is potentially a monster video camera on its own. It lacks the R5 II's 8K feature, but does offer 6K Canon RAW video at up to 60 fps, using the full width of the sensor. You also get fully oversampled full-sensor 4K at up to 60fps, or 4K pixel-binned or cropped at 120 fps. Full HD can be recorded at up to 240 fps, either cropped or with pixel-binning. On top of Log 3, Canon's Log 2 is now supported with 10-bit capture. Canon has significantly reduced its previous overheating issues, though they're not completely eliminated. You can record more than 120 minutes of 6K 60p RAW with proxy recording, as well as 4K 60p, with no restriction for 4K 30p. The primary limitation is 15 minutes for 4K 120p, but that shouldn't be an issue for most videographers or content creators. As you'd expect, the oversampled 4K 60p and 6K 60p RAW video is sharp. Canon's RAW video is very easy to work with in post and with the Log 2 setting delivers extra dynamic range and latitude in post. It'll be interesting to see how pro photographers react to Canon's new flagship. They do gain an extra 10 fps in RAW shooting speeds over Sony's A1 and the Nikon Z9, and the sensor is solid in low light. The downside, though, is the fact that it offers half the resolution of its rivals. The Eye AF II is an interesting gimmick that may give Canon an edge. Other features like face-memorization, sports-specific AF and cross action seem good on paper, but I wasn't able to get the most out of them in the short time I had the camera -- so further testing is required. The EOS R1 is set to arrive in the fall of 2024 with an estimated price of $6,300.