Universities Embrace AI to Score College Essays Despite Student Ban on AI Usage

3 Sources

Share

Colleges are increasingly using artificial intelligence to evaluate student applications and essays, creating an ironic situation where AI is banned for students but embraced by admissions offices. Schools like Virginia Tech and Caltech are implementing AI tools to speed up processing and assess authenticity, though the practice remains controversial.

The Paradox of AI in College Admissions

A striking contradiction has emerged in higher education: while students are prohibited from using artificial intelligence to write their college essays, universities are increasingly deploying AI systems to evaluate those same essays. This development represents a significant shift in how colleges process applications, with institutions like Virginia Tech, California Institute of Technology, and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill leading the charge into AI-assisted admissions

1

.

The irony is not lost on education experts, as colleges require students to certify they haven't used AI unethically while simultaneously embracing these tools for their own evaluation processes. This dual approach reflects the broader tension surrounding AI adoption across industries, where organizations seek efficiency gains while grappling with ethical considerations

2

.

Virginia Tech's AI Essay Reader Revolution

Virginia Tech has emerged as a pioneer in AI-assisted admissions with its newly deployed essay reading system. Juan Espinoza, the university's vice provost for enrollment management, champions the technology's consistency advantages: "Humans get tired; some days are better than others. The AI does not get tired. It doesn't get grumpy. It doesn't have a bad day. The AI is consistent"

1

.

Source: AP

Source: AP

The system, three years in development, processes applications with remarkable efficiency. While human readers average two minutes per essay, the AI can scan approximately 250,000 essays in under an hour. This dramatic speed improvement allows Virginia Tech to notify students of admissions decisions a month earlier than usual, moving the timeline to late January

3

.

The university's approach maintains human oversight through a hybrid system. Previously, each of Virginia Tech's four required short-answer essays was read and scored by two people. Now, one reader is the AI model, trained on past applicant essays and scoring rubrics. A human evaluator intervenes only when the AI and human reader disagree by more than two points on a 12-point scale

1

.

Caltech's Authenticity Detection System

The California Institute of Technology has implemented a different AI approach focused on detecting authenticity in student research submissions. Ashley Pallie, Caltech's admissions director, explains their innovative system: students upload research projects to an AI chatbot that conducts video interviews, later reviewed by faculty members

2

.

"It's a gauge of authenticity. Can you claim this research intellectually? Is there a level of joy around your project? That passion is important to us," Pallie stated. This system addresses concerns about increasingly curated application packages developed with expensive admissions consultants, helping identify genuine student engagement with their submitted work

1

.

Controversy and Backlash

Not all AI implementation attempts have proceeded smoothly. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill faced significant criticism after The Daily Tar Heel reported the school's use of AI to evaluate grammar and writing style in applicant essays. The backlash from applicants, parents, and students forced the university to update its admissions website with clarifications about its AI usage

3

.

Following the controversy, UNC's website now states: "UNC uses AI programs to provide data points about students' common application essay and their school transcripts," emphasizing that every application "is evaluated comprehensively by extensively trained human application evaluators"

1

.

This experience has made other institutions cautious. Espinoza reports receiving inquiries from colleagues interested in similar technology but wary of potential backlash: "The feedback from a lot of colleagues is, 'You roll this out, we're watching you, and we'll see how everyone's reacting'"

2

.

Industry Standards and Ethical Guidelines

The National Association for College Admission Counseling (NACAC) has responded to this trend by updating its ethics guide to include artificial intelligence provisions. Ruby Bhattacharya, chair of NACAC's admission practices committee, notes the difficulty in gauging AI usage prevalence due to its novelty. The updated guidelines urge colleges to ensure their AI usage "aligns with our shared values of transparency, integrity, fairness and respect for student dignity"

1

.

The challenge extends beyond individual institutions, as the practice remains largely opaque. Some schools are "quietly slipping AI into their evaluation process," while others openly promote the technology's benefits for speed and consistency

3

.

Today's Top Stories

TheOutpost.ai

Your Daily Dose of Curated AI News

Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.

© 2025 Triveous Technologies Private Limited
Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo