Fintech Founder Charged with Fraud for Misrepresenting AI Capabilities in Shopping App

14 Sources

Share

Albert Saniger, founder of Nate, faces fraud charges for claiming AI-powered shopping when human workers were actually processing transactions.

News article

Nate's AI Claims Unravel: Founder Charged with Fraud

Albert Saniger, the 35-year-old founder and former CEO of Nate, an e-commerce app that promised a "universal" checkout experience powered by artificial intelligence, has been charged with defrauding investors by the U.S. Department of Justice

1

2

. The charges stem from allegations that Nate's touted AI technology was, in reality, a facade concealing a workforce of human contractors.

The Rise and Fall of Nate

Founded in 2018, Nate raised over $50 million from prominent investors, including a $38 million Series A round in 2021

1

. The app claimed to offer users the ability to purchase from any e-commerce site with a single click, thanks to its proprietary AI technology

3

. Saniger repeatedly assured investors and the public that Nate's app could complete online purchases autonomously, boasting a 93% to 97% completion rate without human intervention

3

.

The Truth Behind the Technology

Contrary to Nate's claims, the DOJ's Southern District of New York alleges that the app relied heavily on hundreds of human contractors in call centers, primarily located in the Philippines and Romania

1

4

. These workers manually completed the purchases that were supposed to be handled by AI

2

. The indictment states that Nate's actual automation rate was effectively 0 percent, despite the company's acquisition of some AI technology and the hiring of data scientists

1

.

Investor Deception and Financial Consequences

Saniger's alleged fraud extended beyond misrepresenting the app's capabilities. He distinguished Nate's technology from automated bots, claiming it used neural networks to complete actions like a human would

3

. This deception, along with instructions to employees to keep the true automation rate secret, allowed Saniger to raise over $40 million from investors

3

.

The scheme began to unravel following an investigation by The Information in 2022, which revealed that between 60% and 100% of Nate's transactions were handled manually

2

5

. By January 2023, Nate had run out of money and was forced to sell its assets, leaving investors with near-total losses

3

5

.

Legal Consequences and Industry Implications

Saniger now faces charges of securities fraud and wire fraud, each carrying a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison

5

. The case highlights a growing concern in the tech industry about the misrepresentation of AI capabilities

4

. Similar incidents have been reported in other sectors, including drive-through software and legal tech, where human labor was disguised as AI-driven solutions

1

5

.

Broader Context of AI Misrepresentation

This case is not isolated, as other companies have faced scrutiny for exaggerating their AI capabilities. For instance, Presto Automation, a labor automation technology provider, recently disclosed that human agents assisted in processing nearly three-quarters of orders in its fast-food voice-ordering products, contradicting earlier claims of minimal human intervention

5

.

The Nate scandal serves as a cautionary tale for investors and consumers alike, emphasizing the need for greater transparency and verification of AI claims in the rapidly evolving tech landscape.

TheOutpost.ai

Your Daily Dose of Curated AI News

Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.

© 2025 Triveous Technologies Private Limited
Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo