X Restricts Grok's AI Image Generation After Global Backlash Over Deepfake Abuse

Reviewed byNidhi Govil

37 Sources

Share

Elon Musk's xAI chatbot Grok faces worldwide regulatory scrutiny after users exploited its AI image generation feature to create sexualized deepfakes and child sexual abuse material. X has partially restricted public access to the tool, limiting @grok replies to paying subscribers, though the feature remains available through other channels. Governments across Europe and Asia threaten enforcement action under online safety laws.

X Restricts Public Access to Grok's Image Tools Amid Controversy

Elon Musk's X has partially restricted access to Grok's AI image generation capabilities following intense global scrutiny for sexualised AI photos that flooded the platform. The Grok image generation feature, which previously allowed any X user to generate and edit images by tagging @grok in posts, now displays a message stating that "image generation and editing are currently limited to paying subscribers"

1

. However, the restriction only applies to public replies on X. Free users can still access the full image editing capabilities through the standalone Grok app, website, and the "Edit image" button available on every image displayed on X's desktop and mobile platforms

2

.

Source: Sky News

Source: Sky News

The change comes after users exploited the tool to upload photos of real people and generate sexualized or nude versions without consent, creating what the Financial Times dubbed "the deepfake porn site formerly known as Twitter." The undress tool enabled a flood of nonconsensual deepfake images targeting women, children, actors, models, and prominent figures

3

. On January 2, Grok itself apologized for creating and sharing child sexual abuse material after safeguard lapses allowed the production of such illegal content

3

.

Source: Beebom

Source: Beebom

Regulatory Scrutiny Intensifies Across Multiple Jurisdictions

Governments and regulators worldwide have launched investigations and threatened enforcement action against X and xAI. The European Commission extended a retention order on Thursday requiring X to preserve all internal documents and data related to Elon Musk's xAI chatbot until the end of 2026

5

. Germany's media minister called for legal steps under the Digital Services Act, warning the problem risked becoming the "industrialisation of sexual harassment"

5

.

In the UK, Prime Minister Keir Starmer branded the content "completely unacceptable" and stated that "all options are on the table," including a potential ban on government use of X

4

. Ofcom warned that platforms failing to curb illegal or harmful content could face enforcement action and hefty fines under the Online Safety Act

4

. The UK government has committed to banning nudification apps and will become the first country to make it illegal to possess, create, or distribute AI tools designed to generate child sexual abuse material, with penalties of up to five years in prison

4

.

Asian Nations Demand Immediate Action on Content Moderation

India's IT Ministry sent X a formal notice on January 2, directing the platform to take down obscene sexualized deepfakes and requiring a report on actions taken within 72 hours, threatening the loss of safe harbor protections

1

. Malaysia's communications regulator MCMC announced it would summon X and open an investigation, warning of potential offences under Section 233 of Malaysia's Communications and Multimedia Act 1998

5

. Australia's eSafety regulator launched an investigation into digitally undressed sexualized images, assessing adult material under its image-based abuse scheme

5

.

Data Protection Concerns and User Safety Questions

The Information Commissioner's Office in the UK said it is investigating whether data protection laws were breached, particularly where images of real people were altered without their consent

4

. Italy's data protection authority warned that using AI tools to create "undressed" deepfake imagery without consent could amount to serious privacy violations and criminal offences

5

. X now requires Grok paying subscribers to share payment information and full names, potentially using this as identity authentication to better track users who create illegal imagery

3

.

Musk's Approach Contrasts With Industry Standards

Musk stated that "anyone using Grok to make illegal content will suffer the same consequences as if they upload illegal content," placing responsibility on users rather than implementing preventive guardrails

1

. This approach of limiting access rather than constraining use contrasts sharply with other AI companies like Google and OpenAI, which impose strict guardrails on tools like Gemini and ChatGPT

2

. Musk has reportedly opposed stricter guardrails personally, and several members of xAI's already sparse safety team quit in the lead up to the deluge of digital undressings

2

. The Internet Watch Foundation questioned whether simply limiting access is sufficient, stating that "companies must make sure the products they build and make available to the global public are safe by design"

3

.

Source: Digit

Source: Digit

Today's Top Stories

TheOutpost.ai

Your Daily Dose of Curated AI News

Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.

© 2026 Triveous Technologies Private Limited
Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo