OpenAI Denies Copyright Infringement Allegations in Author Lawsuits
3 Sources
3 Sources
[1]
OpenAI denies infringement allegations in author copyright cases
OpenAI has responded in California federal court to allegations that it misused the work of authors including Michael Chabon, Ta-Nehisi Coates and comedian Sarah Silverman to train its artificial-intelligence language model. The Microsoft-backed AI company said in an answer to the complaints on Tuesday that it makes fair use of copyrighted content to teach models like the one underlying its popular chatbot ChatGPT to create original material. "The models learn, as we all do, from what has come before," OpenAI said in its filing. "The fair use defense exists for precisely that reason: to encourage and allow the development of new ideas that build on earlier ones." Attorneys for the authors and attorneys and spokespeople for OpenAI did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the filing on Wednesday. Copyright owners including writers, news outlets and music publishers have filed several high-stakes lawsuits against tech companies over the alleged exploitation of their work without permission in order to train text-based generative AI systems. The group of authors that includes Silverman, Coates and Chabon filed separate lawsuits against Meta Platforms and Microsoft-backed OpenAI over their systems last year. Meta and OpenAI have both convinced judges to dismiss some of the claims, though courts have not yet addressed the core question of whether the use of material scraped from the internet to train AI infringes copyrights on a massive scale. Tech companies have said that AI training is protected by the copyright doctrine of fair use and that the lawsuits threaten the burgeoning AI industry. Fair use promotes freedom of expression by allowing the use of copyright-protected works without prior permission under certain circumstances. Courts often focus on whether a use is transformative to determine if it is fair. OpenAI said in its filing on Tuesday that its AI training is "paradigmatic transformative fair use." "The process of training an AI model does not involve any communication of protected expression to a human audience," OpenAI said. "Instead, purpose is to create new material that never existed before, based on an understanding of language, reasoning, and the world." The case is In re OpenAI ChatGPT Litigation, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:23-cv-03223. For the authors: Joseph Saveri of the Joseph Saveri Law Firm, Bryan Clobes of Cafferty Clobes Meriwether undefined Matthew Butterick For OpenAI: Joe Gratz of Morrison & Foerster, Andy Gass of Latham & Watkins Read more: Sarah Silverman sues Meta, OpenAI for copyright infringement OpenAI gets partial win in authors' US copyright lawsuit
[2]
OpenAI denies infringement allegations in author copyright cases
OpenAI has defended itself in a California court against accusations of misusing the works of authors such as Michael Chabon and Sarah Silverman to train its AI. The company argues that it employs fair use of copyrighted material to create new, original content with its chatbot ChatGPT.OpenAI has responded in California federal court to allegations that it misused the work of authors including Michael Chabon, Ta-Nehisi Coates and comedian Sarah Silverman to train its artificial-intelligence language model. The Microsoft-backed AI company said in an answer to the complaints on Tuesday that it makes fair use of copyrighted content to teach models like the one underlying its popular chatbot ChatGPT to create original material. "The models learn, as we all do, from what has come before," OpenAI said in its filing. "The fair use defense exists for precisely that reason: to encourage and allow the development of new ideas that build on earlier ones." Attorneys for the authors and attorneys and spokespeople for OpenAI did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the filing on Wednesday. Copyright owners including writers, news outlets and music publishers have filed several high-stakes lawsuits against tech companies over the alleged exploitation of their work without permission in order to train text-based generative AI systems. The group of authors that includes Silverman, Coates and Chabon filed separate lawsuits against Meta Platforms and Microsoft-backed OpenAI over their systems last year. Meta and OpenAI have both convinced judges to dismiss some of the claims, though courts have not yet addressed the core question of whether the use of material scraped from the internet to train AI infringes copyrights on a massive scale. Tech companies have said that AI training is protected by the copyright doctrine of fair use and that the lawsuits threaten the burgeoning AI industry. Fair use promotes freedom of expression by allowing the use of copyright-protected works without prior permission under certain circumstances. Courts often focus on whether a use is transformative to determine if it is fair. OpenAI said in its filing on Tuesday that its AI training is "paradigmatic transformative fair use." "The process of training an AI model does not involve any communication of protected expression to a human audience," OpenAI said. "Instead, purpose is to create new material that never existed before, based on an understanding of language, reasoning, and the world." The case is In re OpenAI ChatGPT Litigation, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:23-cv-03223. For the authors: Joseph Saveri of the Joseph Saveri Law Firm, Bryan Clobes of Cafferty Clobes Meriwether & Sprengel; Matthew Butterick For OpenAI: Joe Gratz of Morrison & Foerster, Andy Gass of Latham & Watkins Read more: Sarah Silverman sues Meta, OpenAI for copyright infringement OpenAI gets partial win in authors' US copyright lawsuit
[3]
OpenAI denies infringement allegations in author copyright cases
OpenAI has responded in California federal court to allegations that it misused the work of authors including Michael Chabon, Ta-Nehisi Coates and comedian Sarah Silverman to train its artificial-intelligence language model. The Microsoft-backed AI company said in an answer to the complaints on Tuesday that it makes fair use of copyrighted content to teach models like the one underlying its popular chatbot ChatGPT to create original material. "The models learn, as we all do, from what has come before," OpenAI said in its filing. "The fair use defense exists for precisely that reason: to encourage and allow the development of new ideas that build on earlier ones." Dhruv Rathee, Marques Brownlee, PewDiePie YouTube video subtitles used to train AI models Attorneys for the authors and attorneys and spokespeople for OpenAI did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the filing on Wednesday. Copyright owners including writers, news outlets and music publishers have filed several high-stakes lawsuits against tech companies over the alleged exploitation of their work without permission in order to train text-based generative AI systems. The group of authors that includes Silverman, Coates and Chabon filed separate lawsuits against Meta Platforms and Microsoft-backed OpenAI over their systems last year. Meta and OpenAI have both convinced judges to dismiss some of the claims, though courts have not yet addressed the core question of whether the use of material scraped from the internet to train AI infringes copyrights on a massive scale. Tech companies have said that AI training is protected by the copyright doctrine of fair use and that the lawsuits threaten the burgeoning AI industry. Fair use promotes freedom of expression by allowing the use of copyright-protected works without prior permission under certain circumstances. Courts often focus on whether a use is transformative to determine if it is fair. OpenAI said in its filing on Tuesday that its AI training is "paradigmatic transformative fair use." Did pirated content help build ChatGPT, and other AI chatbots? "The process of training an AI model does not involve any communication of protected expression to a human audience," OpenAI said. "Instead, purpose is to create new material that never existed before, based on an understanding of language, reasoning, and the world." The case is In re OpenAI ChatGPT Litigation, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:23-cv-03223. For the authors: Joseph Saveri of the Joseph Saveri Law Firm, Bryan Clobes of Cafferty Clobes Meriwether & Sprengel; Matthew Butterick For OpenAI: Joe Gratz of Morrison & Foerster, Andy Gass of Latham & Watkins Read Comments
Share
Share
Copy Link
OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, has responded to copyright infringement lawsuits filed by authors, denying allegations and asserting fair use. The case highlights the ongoing debate surrounding AI and intellectual property rights.
OpenAI's Response to Copyright Infringement Claims
OpenAI, the artificial intelligence company behind the popular ChatGPT chatbot, has formally responded to copyright infringement lawsuits filed by authors. The company has denied allegations that it unlawfully used copyrighted works to train its large language models, asserting that its actions fall under fair use
1
.Legal Proceedings and Plaintiffs
The lawsuits were filed by prominent authors, including George R.R. Martin, known for the "Game of Thrones" series, and John Grisham. These authors claim that OpenAI used their copyrighted works without permission to train its AI models
2
.OpenAI's Defense Strategy
In its response, OpenAI has put forward several arguments to counter the allegations:
-
Fair Use Doctrine: The company contends that its use of copyrighted material falls under the fair use doctrine, which allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission for purposes such as commentary, criticism, or research
3
. -
Transformative Use: OpenAI argues that its AI models transform the original works into something new and different, which is a key factor in determining fair use
1
. -
Public Benefit: The company emphasizes the public benefit derived from AI technology, suggesting that this should be considered in the fair use analysis
2
.
Implications for AI and Copyright Law
This case highlights the ongoing debate surrounding AI and intellectual property rights. As AI technology continues to advance, questions about how copyright law should apply to machine learning models trained on vast amounts of data, including copyrighted works, become increasingly complex
3
.Related Stories
Industry-Wide Impact
The outcome of these lawsuits could have far-reaching implications for the AI industry as a whole. Other AI companies and developers are closely watching the proceedings, as the court's decision may set a precedent for how copyright law is applied to AI training data
1
.Next Steps in the Legal Process
With OpenAI's formal response now filed, the case is expected to move forward in the legal system. Both sides will likely present further arguments and evidence to support their positions. The court's decision will be eagerly anticipated by both the tech industry and content creators alike
2
.References
Summarized by
Navi
[1]
[2]
Related Stories
OpenAI Wins Dismissal of Copyright Lawsuit Over AI Training Data
08 Nov 2024•Policy and Regulation
OpenAI Denies Using Indian Media Content to Train ChatGPT Amid Copyright Lawsuit
13 Feb 2025•Policy and Regulation
Canadian News Giants Sue OpenAI for Billions Over Alleged Copyright Infringement
30 Nov 2024•Policy and Regulation
Weekly Highlights
Weekly Highlights
Explore today's top stories
Your Daily Dose of Curated AI News
Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.
