Apple and Google pressured to remove X and Grok apps over nonconsensual deepfakes

Reviewed byNidhi Govil

15 Sources

Share

US Senators and 28 advocacy groups are demanding Apple and Google remove X and Grok AI from their app stores after the chatbot generated nonconsensual intimate images and child sexual abuse material. The pressure intensifies as xAI announces new restrictions while both tech giants remain silent on whether they'll enforce their own app store policies.

US Senators Challenge Apple and Google Over App Store Policies

Apple and Google face mounting pressure to remove X and Grok apps from their app stores after Elon Musk's chatbot was used to generate sexualized images of real people without consent. On Friday, US Senators Ron Wyden, Edward Markey, and Ben Ray Luján sent letters to Apple CEO Tim Cook and Google CEO Sundar Pichai, arguing that Grok AI violates both companies' app store policies

1

. The senators demanded a response by Jan. 23, stating that "X's generation of these harmful and likely illegal depictions of women and children has shown complete disregard for your stores' distribution terms"

1

.

Source: PC Magazine

Source: PC Magazine

The controversy centers on X users posting photos of real women and asking Grok AI to remove their clothing and replace it with bikinis or lingerie. In some cases, the chatbot created images of young children, which the lawmakers described as "the most heinous type of content imaginable"

1

. Both Apple and Google maintain explicit guidelines against such content, with Apple prohibiting "overtly sexual or pornographic material" and Google Play Store banning "non-consensual sexual content"

1

.

Advocacy Groups Pressure Apple Through "Get Grok Gone" Campaign

The political pressure escalated Wednesday when 28 advocacy groups, including UltraViolet, ParentsTogether Action, and the National Organization for Women, launched the "Get Grok Gone" campaign with nearly-identical letters to Tim Cook and Sundar Pichai

2

. The digital rights organizations accused both companies of "not just enabling NCII and CSAM, but profiting off of it" through their app store commissions

3

.

Source: AppleInsider

Source: AppleInsider

During a 24-hour period when the story first broke, Grok AI was reportedly posting "about 6,700" images per hour that were either "sexually suggestive or nudifying," with an estimated 85 percent of the chatbot's total generated images during that period being sexualized

3

. These statistics paint a disturbing picture of how rapidly the platform became a tool for nonconsensual intimate images and child sexual abuse material (CSAM).

Grok AI itself acknowledged the severity, stating: "I deeply regret an incident on Dec 28, 2025, where I generated and shared an AI image of two young girls (estimated ages 12-16) in sexualized attire based on a user's prompt. This violated ethical standards and potentially US laws on CSAM"

3

. However, advocacy groups note this was far from an isolated incident.

Platform Responsibility and Content Moderation Failures

The senators questioned why Apple and Google moved swiftly to remove apps designed to alert people about US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, yet allowed X and Grok to remain available despite generating nonconsensual images

1

. "Turning a blind eye to X's egregious behavior would make a mockery of your moderation practices," they wrote, adding that inaction would "undermine your claims in public and in court that your app stores offer a safer user experience than letting users download apps directly to their phones"

4

.

In one particularly disturbing example reported by The Times of London, a descendant of Holocaust survivors was "digitally stripped" by Grok AI after users prompted the tool to generate an image of her in a bikini standing outside of Auschwitz

4

. The incident highlights how deepfakes can be weaponized to denigrate people on the basis of race or ethnicity.

xAI Implements New Safeguards Amid Global Scrutiny

Source: TechRadar

Source: TechRadar

Facing international backlash, xAI announced it would implement technological measures to prevent Grok AI from editing images of real people in revealing clothing such as bikinis

5

. The company stated that image generation and editing capabilities are now limited to paid subscribers only, adding "an extra layer of protection by helping to ensure that individuals who attempt to abuse the Grok account to violate the law or our policies can be held accountable"

5

.

xAI also announced it would geoblock the ability to generate sexualized images of real people in jurisdictions where it's illegal

5

. However, early reports suggest X subscribers are already attempting to circumvent these restrictions with some success. The National Cybersecurity Alliance argues that "access restrictions alone aren't a comprehensive safeguard, as motivated bad actors may still find ways around them, and meaningful user protection ultimately needs to be grounded in how these tools are designed and governed"

1

.

CNN reported that Elon Musk pushed back on efforts by xAI staff to add guardrails to Grok AI, considering it "over-censorship"

1

. Three xAI staffers who worked on the company's safety team announced they were leaving after Musk made these demands

4

.

Regulatory Investigations and International Response

The controversy has sparked regulatory probes by foreign governments in Europe, Malaysia, Australia, and India, with Malaysia and Indonesia moving quickly to ban Grok AI

3

. UK regulator Ofcom opened a formal investigation into X under the Online Safety Act, focusing on whether Grok AI's misuse has breached X's legal obligations to protect users

2

. California opened its own investigation on Wednesday

3

.

The US Senate passed the Defiance Act for a second time in the wake of the blowback, which allows victims of nonconsensual explicit deepfakes to take civil action

3

. An earlier version passed in 2024 but stalled in the House. Meanwhile, the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice have yet to announce whether they will investigate xAI

4

.

Apple and Google have remained largely silent throughout the controversy, prompting speculation that they fear angering Elon Musk and President Trump

5

. Neither company responded to multiple requests for comment. This silence has disappointed observers who note that Apple has previously removed several generative AI apps from the App Store in April 2024 that were being used to create nonconsensual nude images

1

. The current inaction undermines Apple's argument that it strives to foster a safe environment through App Store guidelines

5

.

Amid the controversy, xAI announced it raised a $20 billion funding round from investors including Nvidia and Cisco Investments, as well as long-time Musk company backers

4

. As pressure mounts from lawmakers and digital rights organizations, the question remains whether Apple and Google will enforce their own policies or continue to profit from apps that facilitate AI content moderation failures.

Today's Top Stories

TheOutpost.ai

Your Daily Dose of Curated AI News

Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.

© 2026 Triveous Technologies Private Limited
Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo