You might also stumble upon his short how-to video explainers, simplifying complex topics. Beyond writing, Tashreef enjoys creating short explainer videos, gaming, and exploring animated shows.
NotebookLM has been my go-to research tool for a while now. I've paired it with my Obsidian vault to find patterns in my notes, used it to break down dense documentation, and even leaned on its Audio Overviews when I wanted to listen instead of read. For most of what I throw at it, NotebookLM holds up well. So when someone mentioned a smaller Google Labs tool called Illuminate, I thought why a standalone tool for a feature that NotebookLM already has?
It isn't. Illuminate strips away most of NotebookLM's notebook features and focuses on one thing: turning research papers into short, podcast-style audio discussions. That narrow focus is what makes it better at this specific job. After a few weeks of using it for academic reading, it's become the tool I reach for when I want to consume research instead of analyze it.
Related 6 smart prompts that make NotebookLM way more useful
You're missing out on NotebookLM's full potential.
Posts By Mahnoor Faisal Illuminate is built for podcast-style listening A two-voice discussion you can take with you
NotebookLM's Audio Overview generates a two-host podcast from your uploaded sources, and it works well. You can upload PDFs, slides, or links, and a pair of AI voices will walk through the material in a conversational tone. The audio plays inside the notebook, and you can interact with it by asking questions mid-episode. It's a feature bolted onto a larger research environment, which means listening is one option among many.
Illuminate focuses on doing one thing and does it better. The entire tool is built around generating a five to eight-minute conversation between two AI voices, with everything else acting as support for that experience.
NotebookLM's audio is something I'd play when I'm already at my desk and might want to interact with it. However, with Illuminate, I queue up the audio before a walk, a commute, or a workout. The output sounds like a research podcast, with hosts who explain methodology and findings in plain English. For papers I'd never sit down and read cover to cover, that conversational format makes the material easier to comprehend.
More control over audience, tone, and length Customizing the discussion before it generates
NotebookLM gives you limited say over how the Audio Overview sounds. You can add a short prompt to guide the hosts, but the overall structure, length, and tone are largely fixed. The output is consistent, which is fine when you trust the default, but it feels limiting when you want it a certain way.
Illuminate puts these controls in the generation flow. So, before hitting generate, you get an editable sentence that describes the discussion: who it's for, how it should sound, and how long it should run. Each of those fields is a dropdown. The audience setting lets you pick between beginner, general, or expert, which changes how much background the hosts assume. The tone setting offers presets like casual or semi-professional. Duration runs from short overviews to longer deep dives.
The Free Form option adds more flexibility. Instead of using the preset sentence, you write your own prompt from scratch, describing exactly what you want the discussion to cover and how. This is also the only way to pick the host and guest voices manually, since the other presets auto-select them for you.
For a paper I'm reading to get familiar with a field, I'll set the audience to beginner and the tone to casual. For something closer to my work, I'll bump it up to expert and let the hosts skip the basics. Being able to dial in the discussion before it generates means I don't waste time on audio that's pitched wrong.
Better playback, transcript, and sharing flow Built like a podcast player, not a notebook
The playback interface in Illuminate looks more like a podcast app than an AI tool. Each discussion gets its own player with standard controls: play, scrub, rewind fifteen seconds, and adjust playback speed.
Next to the player sits a full transcript that scrolls in sync with the audio. The current line highlights as the hosts speak, and clicking any sentence jumps the audio to that point. This is the feature I missed most in NotebookLM when I first switched. Skimming a transcript for the part I care about, then tapping to listen, is faster than scrubbing through a timeline blind. NotebookLM has since added transcripts to its Audio Overviews, but Illuminate's implementation feels more central to the experience.
The sharing flow is the other piece that NotebookLM still doesn't match. From the player, I can download the discussion as an MP3 or copy a share link after saving. So, you can just drop those files into your regular podcast app, queue them alongside actual shows, and listen during your usual podcast slots.
Illuminate is still a work in progress Some limitations worth knowing
Illuminate is still labeled as a Google Labs experiment, and it shows in a few places. The biggest limitation is its source scope. It's optimized for arXiv-style academic papers and accepts URLs for some public web content, but it won't process paywalled pages, sites that block AI crawlers, or your own PDFs from disk. If you want to feed it a research paper sitting in your downloads folder, you're out of luck.
There's also a daily generation cap, commonly around twenty discussions per day, which is more than enough for most users but worth knowing if you're planning to batch-generate a queue.
The 30-day retention on the My Library tab is the other quirk. Episodes you generate stay accessible for a month, then disappear. I've gotten into the habit of downloading anything I want to keep.
NotebookLM OS Android, iOS, Web-based app Developer Google
NotebookLM is Google's AI-powered research notebook that reads what you upload and helps you transform it into structured summaries, explanations, and visuals.
See at NotebookLM Expand Collapse When Illuminate makes more sense than NotebookLM
If you're using AI to work through your own documents, run deep research on a topic, or build study guides from mixed sources, NotebookLM is still the better tool. It handles a wider range of inputs and gives you more ways to interact with the material. Illuminate doesn't try to compete with any of that.
Where it wins is on the specific task of turning a research paper into a podcast that you can listen to on the go, along with better controls, a cleaner player, and a usable transcript. Perfect for academic readings.
