AI vs. Pro Gambler: $1 Million March Madness Bet Hinges on Duke-Houston Game
5 Sources
5 Sources
[1]
AI vs. pro gambler's $1 million March Madness bet coming down to Duke and Houston
SAN ANTONIO (AP) -- The $1 million March Madness wager between a pro gambler and an artificial-intelligence site will be decided by the winner of the Duke-Houston game in the Final Four. The Vegas bookies project the gambler, who picked 5 1/2-point favorite Duke, should win. The AI platform 4C Predictions, which picked Houston, says that's why its smarter than them. The bottom line: both pro gambler Sean Perry and the 4C's AI program have done very well over the first 60 games of the tournament. Perry has missed only 13 picks. AI has missed only 10. They both picked all the Final Four teams correctly. Alan Levy, who runs the 4C site, says ChatGPT -- who else? -- says getting 50 of 60 correct places AI in the 95th percentile of all humans "which has gone beyond even what we expected at the start." The leaders in some of the multimillion-person bracket pools on ESPN, Yahoo and CBS are getting 55 or 56 picks right. Both pickers chose Auburn to win in Saturday's other semifinal. Though AI has gotten more right, it could still lose because the picks become worth more points as the tournament progresses. The tournament has largely been a bust for people who love upsets -- good news for both these brackets, which largely stayed away from picking them. Both had Memphis and St. John's winning multiple games. Memphis fell to Colorado State in the first round and St. John's was gone after the second. Levy said he is still analyzing Perry's offer to increase the bet to $10 million. "My prediction?" Levy wrote in an email. "You'll be joining me and the 4C team in all the celebrations" after Saturday's game.
[2]
AI vs. pro gambler's $1 million March Madness bet coming down to Duke and Houston
SAN ANTONIO -- The $1 million March Madness wager between a pro gambler and an artificial-intelligence site will be decided by the winner of the Duke-Houston game in the Final Four. The Vegas bookies project the gambler, who picked 5 1/2-point favorite Duke, should win. The AI platform 4C Predictions, which picked Houston, says that's why its smarter than them. The bottom line: both pro gambler Sean Perry and the 4C's AI program have done very well over the first 60 games of the tournament. Perry has missed only 13 picks. AI has missed only 10. They both picked all the Final Four teams correctly. Alan Levy, who runs the 4C site, says ChatGPT -- who else? -- says getting 50 of 60 correct places AI in the 95th percentile of all humans "which has gone beyond even what we expected at the start." The leaders in some of the multimillion-person bracket pools on ESPN, Yahoo and CBS are getting 55 or 56 picks right. Both pickers chose Auburn to win in Saturday's other semifinal. Though AI has gotten more right, it could still lose because the picks become worth more points as the tournament progresses. The tournament has largely been a bust for people who love upsets -- good news for both these brackets, which largely stayed away from picking them. Both had Memphis and St. John's winning multiple games. Memphis fell to Colorado State in the first round and St. John's was gone after the second. Levy said he is still analyzing Perry's offer to increase the bet to $10 million. "My prediction?" Levy wrote in an email. "You'll be joining me and the 4C team in all the celebrations" after Saturday's game.
[3]
AI vs. pro gambler's $1 million March Madness bet coming down to Duke and Houston
SAN ANTONIO -- The $1 million March Madness wager between a pro gambler and an artificial-intelligence site will be decided by the winner of the Duke-Houston game in the Final Four. The Vegas bookies project the gambler, who picked 5 1/2-point favorite Duke, should win. The AI platform 4C Predictions, which picked Houston, says that's why its smarter than them. The bottom line: both pro gambler Sean Perry and the 4C's AI program have done very well over the first 60 games of the tournament. Perry has missed only 13 picks. AI has missed only 10. They both picked all the Final Four teams correctly. Alan Levy, who runs the 4C site, says ChatGPT -- who else? -- says getting 50 of 60 correct places AI in the 95th percentile of all humans "which has gone beyond even what we expected at the start." The leaders in some of the multimillion-person bracket pools on ESPN, Yahoo and CBS are getting 55 or 56 picks right. Both pickers chose Auburn to win in Saturday's other semifinal. Though AI has gotten more right, it could still lose because the picks become worth more points as the tournament progresses. The tournament has largely been a bust for people who love upsets -- good news for both these brackets, which largely stayed away from picking them. Both had Memphis and St. John's winning multiple games. Memphis fell to Colorado State in the first round and St. John's was gone after the second. Levy said he is still analyzing Perry's offer to increase the bet to $10 million. "My prediction?" Levy wrote in an email. "You'll be joining me and the 4C team in all the celebrations" after Saturday's game.
[4]
AI vs. Pro Gambler's $1 Million March Madness Bet Comes Down to 1 Game
Alan Levy, who runs the 4C site, says ChatGPT -- who else? -- says getting 50 of 60 correct places AI in the 95th percentile of all humans "which has gone beyond even what we expected at the start." The leaders in some of the multimillion-person bracket pools on ESPN, Yahoo and CBS are getting 55 or 56 picks right. Both pickers chose Auburn to win in Saturday's other semifinal. Though AI has gotten more right, it could still lose because the picks become worth more points as the tournament progresses.
[5]
AI Vs. Pro Gambler's $1 Million March Madness Bet Coming Down to Duke and Houston
SAN ANTONIO (AP) -- The $1 million March Madness wager between a pro gambler and an artificial-intelligence site will be decided by the winner of the Duke-Houston game in the Final Four. The Vegas bookies project the gambler, who picked 5 1/2-point favorite Duke, should win. The AI platform 4C Predictions, which picked Houston, says that's why its smarter than them. The bottom line: both pro gambler Sean Perry and the 4C's AI program have done very well over the first 60 games of the tournament. Perry has missed only 13 picks. AI has missed only 10. They both picked all the Final Four teams correctly. Alan Levy, who runs the 4C site, says ChatGPT -- who else? -- says getting 50 of 60 correct places AI in the 95th percentile of all humans "which has gone beyond even what we expected at the start." The leaders in some of the multimillion-person bracket pools on ESPN, Yahoo and CBS are getting 55 or 56 picks right. Both pickers chose Auburn to win in Saturday's other semifinal. Though AI has gotten more right, it could still lose because the picks become worth more points as the tournament progresses. The tournament has largely been a bust for people who love upsets -- good news for both these brackets, which largely stayed away from picking them. Both had Memphis and St. John's winning multiple games. Memphis fell to Colorado State in the first round and St. John's was gone after the second. Levy said he is still analyzing Perry's offer to increase the bet to $10 million. "My prediction?" Levy wrote in an email. "You'll be joining me and the 4C team in all the celebrations" after Saturday's game. Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Share
Share
Copy Link
A high-stakes $1 million March Madness wager between an AI platform and a professional gambler comes down to the Duke-Houston Final Four game, showcasing AI's impressive performance in bracket predictions.
AI Takes on Pro Gambler in Million-Dollar March Madness Showdown
In a groundbreaking clash between artificial intelligence and human expertise, the outcome of a $1 million March Madness wager hangs in the balance, with the Duke-Houston Final Four game set to determine the winner. This high-stakes bet pits professional gambler Sean Perry against the AI platform 4C Predictions, showcasing the potential of AI in sports predictions
1
.The Stakes and Predictions
The Vegas bookmakers are favoring Sean Perry, who picked Duke as a 5.5-point favorite. However, 4C Predictions, the AI platform that chose Houston, argues that this human bias demonstrates its superior intelligence
2
. Both contenders have demonstrated remarkable accuracy throughout the tournament, with Perry missing only 13 picks and the AI missing just 10 out of the first 60 games3
.AI's Impressive Performance
Alan Levy, the operator of the 4C site, reports that according to ChatGPT, the AI's performance of correctly predicting 50 out of 60 games places it in the 95th percentile of all human predictors. This achievement has surpassed the initial expectations of the 4C team
4
. For context, the leaders in multimillion-person bracket pools on major platforms like ESPN, Yahoo, and CBS have correctly predicted 55 or 56 games5
.Tournament Dynamics and Strategy
Both the AI and Perry have adopted similar strategies, largely avoiding upset picks. This approach has proven beneficial in a tournament that has seen fewer upsets than usual. However, despite the AI's current lead in correct picks, the outcome remains uncertain due to the increasing point values assigned to later-stage games
1
.Related Stories
Potential for Increased Stakes
The excitement surrounding this AI vs. human showdown has led to discussions about raising the stakes even further. Sean Perry has offered to increase the bet to $10 million, an proposal that Alan Levy and the 4C team are currently analyzing
3
.Implications for AI in Sports Betting
This high-profile contest highlights the growing role of AI in sports predictions and betting. The AI's strong performance against a seasoned professional gambler demonstrates the potential for machine learning algorithms to compete with and potentially outperform human experts in complex predictive tasks
5
.As the tournament reaches its climax, all eyes will be on the Duke-Houston game, not just for the basketball action, but for the outcome of this unprecedented man-vs-machine betting challenge. The results could have far-reaching implications for the future of sports analytics and gambling industries
2
.References
Summarized by
Navi
[3]
[5]
U.S. News & World Report
|AI Vs. Pro Gambler's $1 Million March Madness Bet Coming Down to Duke and Houston
Related Stories
Weekly Highlights
Weekly Highlights
Explore today's top stories
Your Daily Dose of Curated AI News
Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.
