2 Sources
2 Sources
[1]
Analyst: Apple has been a 'little disingenuous with its marketing' for AI features on iPhone 16
Apple has released its new iPhone 16 family of handsets, with the iPhone 16, iPhone 16 Pro, and iPhone 16 Pro Max available across the planet right now... but... where are all those AI features that hte company promised with Apple Intelligence? The on-device AI functionality that I've even seen advertised on TV, where they've got Bella Ramsey from The Last of Us looking literally useless without her iPhone and Apple Intelligence. The Hollywood actor... acts... as if she hasn't read the script given to her, so she gets a summary of it from Apple Intelligence, like that's meant to make you buy a multi-thousand-dollar new iPhone 16. Anyway, now there's analyst Mark Gurman talking about the useless AI features in Apple's new iPhone 16 handsets and that some of them won't be fully-baked until 2025, and some of them are radically behind competing AI on the market. Gurman said that Apple has been a "little disingenuous with its marketing" as Apple claimed the iPhone 16 was the first model "built from the ground up for Apple Intelligence". Yeah, right... revolutionary and inspiring, right Apple? Gurman said: "To that end, it's no accident that the company is touting Apple Intelligence as the main reason to buy a new iPhone - despite the fact that the AI platform is unfinished and will ultimately work on last year's Pro models. This is where Apple is being a little disingenuous with its marketing. The company claims the iPhone 16 is the first model"built from the ground up for Apple Intelligence."The reality is that the processor and other hardware in the new iPhones isn't meaningfully better for AI. The key factor is having 8 gigabytes of memory, the minimum required to run Apple Intelligence". He continued: "If Apple felt that the hardware changes were enough of a selling point, it would have focused its marketing pitch around those features. Instead, it has zeroed in on Apple Intelligence in spite of the drawbacks. Most consumers won't have access to the software for weeks - with some features not coming until next year - and it's still nowhere near as capable as rival AI systems". If you're an iPhone 15 Pro or iPhone 15 Pro Max user, you've got enough power in your hands to run Apple Intelligence, so there's no big reason to upgrade to the iPhone 16 Pro or iPhone 16 Pro Max. But, if you want to be like Bella Ramsey and have those next to useless AI features... that aren't even here yet, well, you know what to do.
[2]
Apple Is Said To Have Employed 'Disingenuous' Marketing For The iPhone 16, As The Hardware Is Not 'Meaningfully' Better For Running On-Device AI Features
The iPhone 16 lineup does not flaunt a killer redesign, and the majority of the changes introduced by Apple are on the inside and were implemented to address the complaints that iPhone 15 owners experienced. So what selling point can the technology giant bank on to ensure it ships a healthy iPhone 16 units this year? Apple Intelligence, of course, but the company's slew of on-device and cloud-based generative AI features are not expected to arrive until the next major software update. Additionally, a new report states that the firm may have resorted to disingenuous marketing of the iPhone 16 because the hardware is not all that impressive to run those features. We have previously voiced our concerns over the 8GB RAM count that is now consistent with all iPhone 16 models. What Apple should have done was bring 12GB to the 'Pro' models, but at least we do not have to wait a long time because the memory upgrade is slated to arrive next year with the iPhone 17 release. Regardless of what we think, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman mentions in the latest edition of his 'Power On' newsletter that 8GB RAM is the key factor to running Apple Intelligence, as it is the bare minimum required to run AI features. However, he does downplay the remaining specifications, believing that the A18, A18 Pro, and other internals are not meaningfully different, suggesting that the A17 Pro might have been sufficient to fire up Apple Intelligence. Gurman also states that if the company believed that the hardware changes were a selling point, its marketing would have been focused on this aspect instead of the disingenuous tactics used to hype up the iPhone 16. "To that end, it's no accident that the company is touting Apple Intelligence as the main reason to buy a new iPhone -- despite the fact that the AI platform is unfinished and will ultimately work on last year's Pro models. This is where Apple is being a little disingenuous with its marketing. The company claims the iPhone 16 is the first model "built from the ground up for Apple Intelligence." The reality is that the processor and other hardware in the new iPhones isn't meaningfully better for AI. The key factor is having 8 gigabytes of memory, the minimum required to run Apple Intelligence. If Apple felt that the hardware changes were enough of a selling point, it would have focused its marketing pitch around those features. Instead, it has zeroed in on Apple Intelligence in spite of the drawbacks. Most consumers won't have access to the software for weeks -- with some features not coming until next year -- and it's still nowhere near as capable as rival AI systems." Given that an iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone 15 Pro Max are also capable enough to run Apple Intelligence, the majority of buyers would likely have held off from upgrading to the newer models. This reason might explain why the iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max registered an estimated 12.7 percent fewer pre-orders compared to last year's models, but this figure may witness a dramatic turnaround once Apple Intelligence officially rolls out for compatible devices. We will continue to monitor the company's iPhone shipments for this quarter and provide timely updates accordingly.
Share
Share
Copy Link
An analyst criticizes Apple's marketing approach for AI features on the upcoming iPhone 16, calling it "disingenuous." The controversy surrounds Apple's claims about on-device AI capabilities and their potential impact on the smartphone market.

In a recent development, Apple's marketing strategy for the upcoming iPhone 16 has come under fire, with an analyst labeling it as "disingenuous." The controversy centers around Apple's claims about on-device AI capabilities, which have raised eyebrows in the tech community
1
.Ming-Chi Kuo, a respected analyst known for his insights into Apple's product pipeline, has expressed skepticism about Apple's AI-related marketing claims. Kuo suggests that Apple's emphasis on on-device AI processing for the iPhone 16 might be misleading, given that most AI computations are likely to occur in the cloud
2
.According to Kuo, the majority of AI processing for smartphones, including iPhones, primarily takes place in the cloud rather than on the device itself. This assertion challenges Apple's marketing narrative, which has been highlighting the iPhone 16's on-device AI capabilities as a key selling point
1
.The analyst's comments have sparked discussions about the potential impact on iPhone 16 sales. Kuo suggests that the emphasis on AI features may not significantly boost shipments, contrary to what Apple might be hoping for. This perspective raises questions about the effectiveness of Apple's marketing strategy and its potential influence on consumer decisions
2
.Apple's push for AI features comes at a time when competitors like Google and Samsung are also integrating AI capabilities into their devices. The iPhone maker's approach to marketing these features is seen as an attempt to stay competitive in a rapidly evolving smartphone market
1
.Related Stories
Despite the controversy, the focus on AI in smartphones is expected to continue. The industry is moving towards more advanced AI integration, with companies exploring ways to enhance user experiences through intelligent features. However, the debate around on-device versus cloud-based AI processing is likely to persist as technology evolves
2
.As the discussion unfolds, consumers are left to navigate the complex landscape of AI capabilities in smartphones. The controversy highlights the importance of clear communication from tech companies about the true nature and limitations of AI features in their devices
1
.Summarized by
Navi
[1]