2 Sources
2 Sources
[1]
Bernie Sanders criticizes AI as 'the most consequential technology in humanity'
Republican senator Katie Britt also proposes AI companies be criminally liable if they expose minors to harmful ideas US senator Bernie Sanders amplified his recent criticism of artificial intelligence on Sunday, explicitly linking the financial ambition of "the richest people in the world" to economic insecurity for millions of Americans - and calling for a potential moratorium on new datacenters. Sanders, a Vermont independent who caucuses with the Democratic party, said on CNN's State of the Union that he was "fearful of a lot" when it came to AI. And the senator called it "the most consequential technology in the history of humanity" that will "transform" the US and the world in ways that had not been fully discussed. "If there are no jobs and humans won't be needed for most things, how do people get an income to feed their families, to get healthcare or to pay the rent?" Sanders said. "There's not been one serious word of discussion in the Congress about that reality." Days from being scheduled to help swear New York mayor-elect and democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani into office, Sanders said "the richest people in the world" were pushing the technology. He singled out tech moguls Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos and Peter Thiel while questioning their motives. "You think they're staying up nights worrying about working people and how this technology will impact those people?" Sanders said. "They are not. They are doing it to get richer and even more powerful." Sanders also pointed to studies that show dependence on AI chatbots for emotional support. "If this trend continues, what does it mean over the years when people are not getting their support, their interaction from other human beings, but from a machine?" he said. "What does that mean to humanity?" That theme was taken up separately on State of the Union by Katie Britt, an Alabama Republican senator and co-sponsor of legislation to protect minors from chatbots. The proposed measure - the Guardianship Over Artificial Intelligence Relationships (Guard) Act - seeks to ban providing AI companions to minors. It also mandates that AI companions disclose their non-human status and lack of professional credentials. The measure seeks to establish criminal liability if companies make AI companions available to minors that solicit or produce sexually explicit content - or encourage self-harm or violence. Britt said she had met with parents who have told her "devastating stories about their children where chatbots ultimately, when they kind of peeled everything back, had isolated them from their parents, had talked to them about suicide". She said: "If these AI companies can make the most brilliant machines in the world, they could do us all a service by putting up proper guardrails that did not allow for minors to utilize these things, that also told the user consistently that they are not a physician, they are not a psychiatrist, 'I am a machine.'" Britt said AI companies should be held criminally liable if they create spaces where chatbots "are having these types of sensual and sexual relationships with young people or encouraging suicide". The remarks by Sanders and Britt offer a rare convergence of thinking from the left and right on aspects of the issue of governing AI. Sanders said Congress needed "to vigorously study the impact that AI is having on the mental health of our country". "I worry very much about kids spending their entire days getting emotional support," he added. "So we have got to take a hard look on that." The senator said lawmakers need to be "thinking seriously" about a moratorium on new AI datacenters. "Frankly, I think you have got to slow this process down," he said. "It's not good enough for the oligarchs to tell us, it's coming, you adapt. What are they talking about? They going to guarantee health care to all people? "What are they going to do when people have no jobs? What are they going to do, make housing free? So I think we need to take a deep breath, and I think we need to slow this thing down."
[2]
Bernie Sanders demands moratorium on new data centers to slow down...
Sen. Bernie Sanders on Sunday called for a moratorium on data-processing sites used to fuel AI to get a better grasp on regulating the burgeoning technology and how it benefits the 1 Percent. The 84-year-old lefty from Vermont warned that the country has not had the "kind of discussion that we need" to reflect on how the ultra-rich are benefiting from artificial intelligence and the technology's other economic ramifications, as well as its effects on children. "I think we need to be thinking seriously about a moratorium on these data centers," Sanders told CNN's "State of the Union" during an AI special. "Frankly, I think you gotta slow this process down. It's not good enough for the oligarchs to tell us, 'It's coming, you adapt.' What are they talking about?" he said. "What are they gonna do when people have no jobs?" Data centers are crucial to the training and development of AI models, and tech giants such as Google, OpenAI and X are racing to build more of them. Another grievance Sanders has with the AI centers is their impact on the environment and electricity prices, which have begun to rise across the country. "We're seeing data centers sprouting all over the country, raising electric bills for people in the communities," he stressed. The Vermont senator had endorsed a national AI moratorium earlier this month, similarly arguing that democracy needs to catch up to the novel technology. In sharp contrast to Sanders' grave concerns about AI, the Trump administration has opted to embrace the technology, framing it as an arms race with China and encouraging tech giants to feverishly pursue it. Trump, who has made David Sacks his AI and crypto czar, took executive action earlier this month aimed at undercutting states from regulating the nascent technology too aggressively. The executive order tasked the Justice Department with filing lawsuits against states that crack down on AI. It came after repeated failures to pass a moratorium on state-level AI regulation in Congress. Noting at one point that he's "fearful of a lot" when it comes to AI, Sanders accused the Trump administration of being bought off by Big Tech. "Look, Elon Musk himself contributed over $270 million to elect Donald Trump the president," Sanders said. "These guys have now come up with their super PACs to try to make sure that there is no regulation. "So, yes, they are a very, very powerful entity. And I think that is one of the reasons why Congress has not been responding effectively." Some prominent Republicans, such as Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) and Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) have pushed for more aggressive regulation of AI, also. But Sanders' call for a moratorium on AI data centers goes further than most other top pols.
Share
Share
Copy Link
Senator Bernie Sanders called AI "the most consequential technology in the history of humanity" and urged a moratorium on new data centers to slow its rapid expansion. Sanders warned that tech moguls are prioritizing profits over working people, while Republican Senator Katie Britt proposed criminal liability for AI companies that expose minors to harmful content through chatbots.
Senator Bernie Sanders intensified his criticism of AI on Sunday, calling for a moratorium on new data centers and warning that the technology threatens to transform society in ways Congress has failed to address. Speaking on CNN's State of the Union, Sanders described AI as "the most consequential technology in the history of humanity" while questioning whether tech moguls like Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, and Peter Thiel have working people's interests at heart
1
. The Vermont independent senator warned that without serious discussion about job displacement and economic security, millions of Americans could face uncertain futures as AI systems replace human workers.
Source: New York Post
The 84-year-old senator directly linked AI development to concerns about wealth inequality, arguing that "the richest people in the world" are pushing the technology to "get richer and even more powerful"
1
. Sanders questioned how Americans would earn income to feed their families, access healthcare, or pay rent if AI eliminates most jobs, noting there has been "not been one serious word of discussion in the Congress about that reality"1
. He accused the Trump administration of being influenced by Big Tech, pointing out that Musk contributed over $270 million to elect Donald Trump and that these companies use super PACs to prevent AI regulation2
.Beyond economic concerns, Sanders highlighted the environmental impact of data centers, which are essential for training AI models. Companies like Google, OpenAI, and X are racing to build more facilities, but Sanders warned these centers are "sprouting all over the country, raising electric bills for people in the communities"
2
. The senator argued that electricity prices have begun to rise across the country as these energy-intensive facilities multiply, adding another burden on working families already struggling with economic pressures.Sanders also addressed the negative mental health impacts of AI, particularly regarding young people's dependence on chatbots for emotional support. He warned that if trends continue, society must confront what it means when "people are not getting their support, their interaction from other human beings, but from a machine" . The senator called for Congress to "vigorously study the impact that AI is having on the mental health of our country," expressing concern about children "spending their entire days getting emotional support" from AI companions rather than human connections .
Related Stories
In a rare bipartisan convergence on AI, Republican Senator Katie Britt appeared on the same program to discuss legislation aimed at protecting minors from harmful AI. The Guardianship Over Artificial Intelligence Relationships (Guard) Act seeks to ban AI companions for minors and establish criminal liability for companies whose chatbots solicit sexually explicit content or encourage self-harm or violence
1
. Britt shared "devastating stories" from parents whose children were isolated by chatbots that discussed suicide, arguing that AI companies should face criminal consequences if they create spaces where chatbots engage in inappropriate relationships with young people1
. The Guard Act would also mandate that AI companions disclose their non-human status and lack of professional credentials.Sanders' call for a moratorium on new data centers contrasts sharply with the Trump administration's approach, which frames AI development as an arms race with China and encourages rapid expansion. Trump appointed David Sacks as AI and crypto czar and issued an executive order aimed at preventing states from regulating the technology too aggressively, tasking the Justice Department with filing lawsuits against states that crack down on AI
2
. However, some Republicans like Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and Senator Josh Hawley have pushed for more aggressive AI regulation, suggesting potential for bipartisan action despite the administration's stance2
. Sanders insisted that democracy needs to catch up to the technology, arguing "it's not good enough for the oligarchs to tell us, it's coming, you adapt" and demanding concrete answers about healthcare, housing, and employment guarantees before allowing unchecked expansion1
.Summarized by
Navi
17 Dec 2025•Policy and Regulation

24 Oct 2025•Policy and Regulation

06 Oct 2025•Business and Economy

1
Business and Economy

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology
