The Outpost is a comprehensive collection of curated artificial intelligence software tools that cater to the needs of small business owners, bloggers, artists, musicians, entrepreneurs, marketers, writers, and researchers.
© 2025 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved
Curated by THEOUTPOST
On Sat, 5 Oct, 12:02 AM UTC
2 Sources
[1]
Letter: Former Google boss's article was an eye-opener
"War in the age of AI demands new weaponry", the opinion piece by Eric Schmidt, former chief executive of Google and founding partner of Innovation Endeavors, was certainly an eye-opener (Opinion, FT Weekend, September 21). "The defence industry is having a moment," is his opening sentence. Schmidt is clearly of the opinion that providing weaponry for war is a good thing. It definitely is profitable. He talks of "weapon systems that are affordable, attritable and abundant" and says that "many more opportunities are coming for start-ups and defence unicorns." Affordable for whom? And at what cost to human life in numerous parts of the world? I was reminded of the Bob Dylan song "Masters of War" from 1963:
[2]
Letter: Business of war in the age of AI was depressing read
It's a long time since I've read such a depressing piece in the FT as Eric Schmidt's column "War in the age of AI demands new weaponry" (Opinion, FT Weekend, September 21). As former chief executive of Google, he has the skills to describe the growth opportunities for the business of war in the age of artificial intelligence in a brisk and business-like manner, including anticipating the arrival of the first trillion-dollar US defence budget, and the need to "weigh total cost and supply chain resilience with other factors like performance". Surprisingly, he doesn't mention the huge opportunities presented by expansion of wars into space (presumably for lack of it -- space on the page I mean).
Share
Share
Copy Link
Eric Schmidt's opinion piece on AI in warfare draws criticism for its focus on business opportunities in defense, raising ethical concerns about the intersection of technology and conflict.
Eric Schmidt, former CEO of Google and founding partner of Innovation Endeavors, has sparked controversy with his recent opinion piece titled "War in the age of AI demands new weaponry" 1. The article, published in the Financial Times, has drawn significant attention and criticism for its focus on the business opportunities presented by AI-driven warfare.
In his article, Schmidt argues that the defense industry is experiencing a pivotal moment. He advocates for the development of "weapon systems that are affordable, attritable and abundant," highlighting the potential for startups and "defense unicorns" to capitalize on these opportunities 1. Schmidt's perspective seems to frame the integration of AI into warfare primarily as a business venture, emphasizing the profitability and growth potential in the sector.
The article has prompted strong reactions from readers, with many expressing concern over the ethical implications of Schmidt's stance. One letter to the editor questions the true cost of these "affordable" weapons systems, particularly in terms of human life 1. The critic draws a parallel to Bob Dylan's 1963 anti-war song "Masters of War," suggesting that Schmidt's approach prioritizes profit over human welfare.
Another reader describes Schmidt's piece as "depressing," noting the former Google executive's "brisk and business-like manner" in discussing the growth opportunities in AI-driven warfare 2. The letter points out Schmidt's anticipation of the first trillion-dollar US defense budget and his emphasis on factors like "total cost and supply chain resilience" in weapon system development.
Critics also note that Schmidt's article doesn't address the potential expansion of warfare into space, which some view as a significant oversight given the increasing militarization of this domain 2. This omission raises questions about the full scope of AI's potential impact on future conflicts and the ethical considerations surrounding such expansions.
The controversy surrounding Schmidt's article highlights the ongoing ethical debate at the intersection of artificial intelligence, warfare, and business. It underscores the tension between technological advancement and moral responsibility, particularly when it comes to the development of AI-driven weapons systems.
As AI continues to evolve and integrate into various sectors, including defense, the public discourse around its ethical implications is likely to intensify. Schmidt's article serves as a catalyst for this important conversation, prompting readers to consider the long-term consequences of AI in warfare beyond mere business opportunities.
Reference
[1]
[2]
Eric Schmidt, ex-Google CEO, urges the US Army to replace traditional tanks with AI-driven drones, citing cost-effectiveness and recent warfare trends. This proposal aligns with his involvement in a drone startup, raising questions about the future of military technology.
3 Sources
3 Sources
Eric Schmidt, ex-Google CEO, expresses concerns about AI being weaponized for terror, highlighting potential misuse by rogue states and terrorists. He advocates for balanced oversight while warning against over-regulation that could stifle innovation.
3 Sources
3 Sources
Google has quietly removed its commitment not to use AI for weapons or surveillance, signaling a shift towards potential military applications amidst growing competition and national security concerns.
40 Sources
40 Sources
Eric Schmidt, along with other tech leaders, cautions against a global race for superintelligent AI, warning of potential conflicts and proposing a new deterrence strategy.
4 Sources
4 Sources
The global AI race heats up as China challenges US dominance, raising concerns about unregulated competition and potential catastrophic risks. The debate between open-source and proprietary AI development intensifies amid geopolitical tensions.
2 Sources
2 Sources
