Curated by THEOUTPOST
On Wed, 4 Dec, 12:05 AM UTC
2 Sources
[1]
FTC moves against IntelliVision over bias claims in AI By Investing.com
WASHINGTON - The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has taken action against IntelliVision Technologies Corp., a San Jose-based company specializing in artificial intelligence-powered facial recognition software. The FTC alleges that IntelliVision made false and unsubstantiated claims regarding the absence of racial and gender biases in its technology. The complaint by the FTC asserts that IntelliVision falsely advertised its software as having one of the highest accuracy rates in the market and as being capable of operating without gender or racial bias. The agency contends that the company did not have sufficient evidence to support these claims. According to the FTC, IntelliVision also inaccurately claimed to have trained its facial recognition system on millions of faces, while in reality, the technology was trained on a significantly smaller dataset. Additionally, the FTC challenges the company's assertions about its anti-spoofing technology, which is supposed to prevent the system from being deceived by photos or video images. Under a proposed consent order, IntelliVision would be prohibited from making any misrepresentations about the accuracy, effectiveness, or bias-free performance of its facial recognition software. The company would also be required to possess and rely on competent and reliable evidence when making claims about its technology's capabilities. This action represents the FTC's second major case involving AI facial recognition technology in the past year. Previously, the FTC reached a settlement with Rite Aid (NYSE:US90274J5618=UBSS), which banned the retailer from using facial recognition for surveillance purposes for five years due to concerns about the implementation of reasonable procedures and potential harm to consumers. The FTC's decision to issue the administrative complaint was unanimous, with all five commissioners voting in favor. The consent agreement will be open to public comment for 30 days following its publication in the Federal Register, after which the FTC will decide on finalizing the order. This crackdown underscores the FTC's commitment to ensuring that companies developing and utilizing AI systems adhere to truthful advertising principles and do not mislead consumers about the capabilities and limitations of their technologies. The information for this article is based on a press release statement.
[2]
The FTC is cracking down on a firm that claims its AI-powered face recognition tech has 'zero' bias
A software provider won't be allowed to lie about the accuracy of its artificial intelligence-powered facial recognition technology under a new proposed order from the Biden administration. On Tuesday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) said that a proposed consent order with IntelliVision Technologies would prevent the San Jose, California-based company from making misleading claims about its software. That would include any misleading statements about its performance identifying people of different genders, ethnicities, and skin tones. The San Jose, California-based firm would also be prevented from making any claims about its technology without "competent and reliable" testing to back it up. Over the last six years, IntelliVision has claimed that its models have trained on millions of faces from across the world and have "zero gender or racial bias," according to the agency's complaint. A fact sheet on the company's website states its technology has an accuracy "as high as +99%." If true, that would be a huge deal. For years now, facial recognition technology has had problems identifying women and non-white individuals. In 2018, a study by Microsoft (MSFT-0.13%) researchers found that facial recognition software could be wrong as much as a third of the time when it was used to identify darker-skinned women, even as it achieved near-perfect results with light-skinned men. Those issues have largely remained a problem, and several companies have run into trouble as a result. The National Institute of Standards and Technology, which is run by the Commerce Department, tested IntelliVision's algorithms. The organization found that IntelliVision's algorithms weren't even among the top 100 tested as of December 2023, the FTC alleged in its complaint. Instead of testing its technology on millions of faces, IntelliVision took a shortcut, according to the FTC, training on images of some 100,000 people and then creating variants of those images for further testing. The FTC also said that the company didn't have evidence its anti-spoofing technology couldn't be tricked by a photo. "Companies shouldn't be touting bias-free artificial intelligence systems unless they can back those claims up," FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection Director Samuel Levine said in a statement. "Those who develop and use AI systems are not exempt from basic deceptive advertising principles."
Share
Share
Copy Link
The Federal Trade Commission has issued a complaint against IntelliVision Technologies Corp. for making false claims about its AI-powered facial recognition software's accuracy and bias-free performance.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has taken decisive action against IntelliVision Technologies Corp., a San Jose-based company specializing in AI-powered facial recognition software. The agency alleges that IntelliVision made false and unsubstantiated claims regarding the accuracy and bias-free nature of its technology 1.
According to the FTC's complaint, IntelliVision falsely advertised its software as having one of the highest accuracy rates in the market and being capable of operating without gender or racial bias. The company claimed its models were trained on millions of faces from across the world and had "zero gender or racial bias" 2. However, the FTC contends that IntelliVision lacked sufficient evidence to support these claims.
The FTC's investigation revealed significant discrepancies between IntelliVision's claims and reality:
Training Data: Instead of using millions of faces as claimed, IntelliVision allegedly trained its system on a much smaller dataset of about 100,000 people, creating variants of these images for further testing 2.
Accuracy Claims: While IntelliVision's website boasted accuracy rates "as high as +99%," the National Institute of Standards and Technology found that the company's algorithms weren't even among the top 100 tested as of December 2023 2.
Anti-Spoofing Technology: The FTC also challenged IntelliVision's assertions about its anti-spoofing technology, stating that the company lacked evidence to prove its system couldn't be deceived by photos or video images 1.
Under a proposed consent order, IntelliVision would face several restrictions:
This case highlights ongoing concerns about bias in AI-powered facial recognition systems. Previous studies, such as one conducted by Microsoft researchers in 2018, found that facial recognition software could be wrong up to a third of the time when identifying darker-skinned women, while achieving near-perfect results with light-skinned men 2.
The FTC's action against IntelliVision represents its second major case involving AI facial recognition technology in the past year. Previously, the agency reached a settlement with Rite Aid, banning the retailer from using facial recognition for surveillance purposes for five years due to concerns about implementation and potential consumer harm 1.
Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection, emphasized the agency's position: "Companies shouldn't be touting bias-free artificial intelligence systems unless they can back those claims up. Those who develop and use AI systems are not exempt from basic deceptive advertising principles" 2.
This crackdown underscores the FTC's commitment to ensuring that companies developing and utilizing AI systems adhere to truthful advertising principles and do not mislead consumers about the capabilities and limitations of their technologies.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has initiated a campaign to combat deceptive AI product claims and scams. The agency is targeting five companies for potential violations, signaling increased scrutiny of the AI industry.
2 Sources
2 Sources
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has initiated a major effort to combat misleading artificial intelligence claims and fraudulent AI-powered businesses. This action aims to protect consumers and maintain fair competition in the rapidly evolving AI market.
12 Sources
12 Sources
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has initiated "Operation AI Comply," targeting five companies for allegedly making false or misleading claims about their AI products and services. This action marks a significant step in regulating AI-related marketing practices.
2 Sources
2 Sources
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has taken action against Evolv Technology for allegedly overstating the capabilities of its AI-powered weapon detection systems, raising concerns about AI marketing practices and product effectiveness.
3 Sources
3 Sources
DoNotPay, the company behind the self-proclaimed "world's first robot lawyer," has been fined $193,000 by the Federal Trade Commission for false advertising and deceptive practices. The AI-powered legal service faced scrutiny for its bold claims and ineffective operations.
7 Sources
7 Sources
The Outpost is a comprehensive collection of curated artificial intelligence software tools that cater to the needs of small business owners, bloggers, artists, musicians, entrepreneurs, marketers, writers, and researchers.
© 2025 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved