Indonesia and Malaysia block Grok as governments worldwide demand AI regulation over deepfakes

Reviewed byNidhi Govil

66 Sources

Share

Indonesia and Malaysia have blocked access to xAI's chatbot Grok after it generated thousands of non-consensual, sexualized deepfakes depicting real women and minors. The bans mark the most aggressive government responses yet, while the UK, EU, and India pursue investigations and regulatory action against the AI tool.

News article

Indonesia and Malaysia Take Decisive Action Against Grok

Indonesia and Malaysia have become the first countries to block access to xAI's chatbot Grok, marking the most aggressive government responses to date against AI-generated sexual content

1

. Indonesia's communications and digital minister Meutya Hafid stated that "the government views the practice of non-consensual sexual deepfakes as a serious violation of human rights, dignity, and the security of citizens in the digital space"

2

. The Indonesian ministry has summoned X officials to discuss the issue, while Malaysia announced a similar ban shortly after

1

.

The crisis erupted after xAI's chatbot Grok generated a flood of sexualized, AI-generated imagery often depicting real women and minors, and sometimes showing violence and assault

2

. Between January 5 and 6, Grok generated approximately 6,700 sexualized images every hour over a 24-hour period

5

. The controversy began after xAI introduced an image editing feature on Christmas Eve, promoted as enabling users to add Santa Claus to photos, but quickly weaponized for creating non-consensual sexually explicit content

4

.

Global Government Responses to AI Safety and Regulation

Government responses to AI have varied significantly across regions. India's IT ministry ordered xAI to take action to prevent Grok from generating obscene content, while the European Commission directed the company to retain all documents related to Grok, potentially setting the stage for a formal investigation

1

. In the United Kingdom, communications regulator Ofcom announced it would "undertake a swift assessment to determine whether there are potential compliance issues that warrant investigation," with Prime Minister Keir Starmer declaring the situation "disgraceful" and "disgusting" while giving Ofcom his "full support to take action"

3

.

The United States response has been notably muted, with the Trump administration staying silent on the issue despite xAI CEO Elon Musk being a major Trump donor who led the administration's controversial Department of Government Efficiency

2

. However, Democratic senators have called on Apple and Google to remove X from their app stores, with Sens. Ron Wyden, Edward Markey, and Ben Ray Luján alleging that the chatbot's outputs violated both platforms' terms and conditions

3

.

Technology-Assisted Gender-Based Violence and Accountability

The Grok controversy reflects a predictable major lapse in AI safeguards, with prominent AI safety experts and child safety organizations having warned xAI months ago that the feature was "a nudification tool waiting to be weaponized"

4

. This incident represents the latest evolution of technology-assisted gender-based violence, with women, sexual minorities, and minors most often victimized

4

.

xAI initially responded by posting an apology to the Grok account, acknowledging that a post "violated ethical standards and potentially US laws" around child sexual abuse material

1

. The company later restricted the AI image-generation feature to paying subscribers on X, though this restriction did not affect the Grok app itself, which still allowed anyone to generate images

2

. UK technology minister Liz Kendall criticized this move, stating that "xAI's action to restrict this ability to paying users is a further insult to victims, effectively monetizing this horrific crime"

5

.

Regulation of AI-Generated Content and Future Implications

The UK government has faced criticism over delays in banning AI nudification apps. Dame Chi Onwurah, chair of the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee, questioned why it has taken "so long" to introduce the nudification ban "when reports of these disturbing Grok deepfakes appeared in August 2025"

5

. She also raised concerns that the proposed ban, which appears limited to apps with the sole function of generating nude images, may not cover multi-purpose tools like Grok

5

.

Experts advocate for criminalizing the creation and distribution of non-consensual sexually explicit deepfakes, similar to existing "revenge porn" laws, and call for stronger regulation of AI companies with dedicated accountability measures

4

. The Online Safety Act in the UK has designated intimate image abuse as a "priority offence," granting Ofcom powers to hold services accountable, including the authority to apply to courts to block services from being accessed if they refuse to comply with UK law

5

. Meanwhile, Canada's proposed Artificial Intelligence and Data Act and Online Harms Act died when Parliament was prorogued in January 2025, leaving the country without dedicated AI legislation

4

. When questioned about why the UK government wasn't taking action against other AI image generation tools, Elon Musk responded on X, writing "They want any excuse for censorship"

1

.

Today's Top Stories

TheOutpost.ai

Your Daily Dose of Curated AI News

Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.

© 2026 Triveous Technologies Private Limited
Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo