Lockheed Martin tests AI on F-35 fighter jets to identify combat threats within minutes

2 Sources

Share

Lockheed Martin successfully flight-tested Project Overwatch, an artificial intelligence system that autonomously identifies combat threats on F-35 Lightning II fighters. The tactical AI model resolves emitter ambiguities in real-time, accelerating pilot decision-making while maintaining human authority over final targeting decisions.

Lockheed Martin Advances F-35 Combat Capabilities with AI

Aerospace giant Lockheed Martin announced it has successfully flight-tested an artificial intelligence system integrated into the F-35 Lightning II fighter jet, marking a significant advance in military aviation technology

1

. The demonstration, known as Project Overwatch, represents the first time a tactical AI model has generated independent Combat Identification directly on a pilot's display during flight

2

. Conducted at Nellis Air Force Base in Nevada, the test showcased how artificial intelligence can accelerate threat identification and enhance situational awareness in rapidly evolving combat environments.

Source: Jerusalem Post

Source: Jerusalem Post

How AI-Powered Combat Identification Works in Real-Time

During the Project Overwatch test flight, Lockheed Martin's AI machine learning model resolved emitter ambiguities among unknown contacts, delivering real-time combat ID to pilots within seconds

1

. The system autonomously processes sensor data from the F-35's information fusion system, helping pilots prioritize combat threat IDs and targets much faster than traditional methods allow

2

. This capability reduces pilot decision-making latency, enabling warfighters to make better, faster decisions about how to confront enemy forces. Critically, while the AI provides rapid identification, pilots retain full authority to review the summary and make final targeting decisions.

Rapid Software Modernization Transforms Mission Planning

What sets this capability apart is the speed of adaptation. Engineers used automated tools to label new emitters, retrain the AI model to learn new emitter classes within minutes, and reload the updated model for the next flight—all within the same mission planning cycle

2

. Traditionally, incorporating new data from a pilot's flight into future mission parameters would take days or longer, requiring extensive debriefing and analysis. Jake Wertz, vice president of F-35 Combat Systems at Lockheed Martin Aeronautics, described the achievement as "a demonstration of 6th Gen technology brought to a 5th Gen platform"

2

. This ability to reprogram the AI model on the ground and have updates available for the next sortie is essential for maintaining tactical advantage against emerging threats.

Implications for Fighter Jet Operations and Military Strategy

The integration of AI into the F-35's software capabilities aligns the fighter jet with next-generation systems, though sources indicate that adapting the technology from one test flight to full operational deployment across America's F-35 fleet could take 3 years or more

2

. Lockheed Martin plans to continue improving the capability, expanding the AI model's training to further enhance reliability and accuracy. The company noted that "embedding this advanced AI into the F-35's mission system helps pilots understand threats faster so they can make decisions more quickly, because operators don't have time to synthesize data in combat"

2

. This development builds on Lockheed Martin's broader work deploying real-time, over-the-air software updates to systems like the Aegis multi-mission combat system used by US Navy ships in the Red Sea against advanced drone and missile threats.

Source: Interesting Engineering

Source: Interesting Engineering

The Balance Between Human Authority and AI Decision-Making

The successful test raises ongoing questions about the appropriate balance between human decision-makers and AI programs in warfare. While Israel has integrated AI into target-bank decisions since at least 2019, with major enhancements during recent conflicts, sources confirm that final decision-making authority still resides with human defense officials

2

. However, little has been publicized about how and when human operators veto AI recommendations. As Lockheed Martin advances its 21st-century strategy integrating next-generation performance, continual software modernization, and AI-driven decision making, the military community will watch closely how these systems perform under operational conditions and what protocols emerge for human oversight of AI-powered combat identification systems.

Today's Top Stories

TheOutpost.ai

Your Daily Dose of Curated AI News

Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.

© 2026 Triveous Technologies Private Limited
Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo