Mac cluster AI calculations get major boost from Thunderbolt 5 RDMA support

Reviewed byNidhi Govil

3 Sources

Share

Apple's macOS Tahoe 26.2 introduces RDMA support over Thunderbolt 5, transforming Mac cluster computing for AI researchers. Real-world tests show a four-Mac Studio cluster with 1.5TB pooled memory can run trillion-parameter models locally, delivering up to 32.5 tokens per second. But rising memory prices could threaten Apple's cost advantage over NVIDIA solutions.

Apple Transforms Mac Cluster Computing with Thunderbolt 5 RDMA

Apple's latest update to macOS Tahoe 26.2 has introduced a significant enhancement to its machine learning framework that stands to reshape how AI researchers approach complex computational tasks. The update brings Remote Direct Access Memory (RDMA) support over Thunderbolt 5 to Mac cluster computing, allowing multiple Mac devices to pool their memory resources with unprecedented efficiency. This development addresses a critical bottleneck in AI workflows: accessing sufficient memory to run massive large language models without relying on expensive cloud infrastructure.

1

The implementation leverages Thunderbolt 5's maximum bandwidth of 80Gb/s, doubling the 40Gb/s available with Thunderbolt 4 and vastly outperforming typical Ethernet-based cluster computing limited to 10Gb/s. More importantly, RDMA enables one CPU node in a cluster to directly read another's memory without requiring significant processing power from the secondary device, effectively creating a unified memory pool across multiple machines.

1

Source: Geeky Gadgets

Source: Geeky Gadgets

Real-World Benchmarks Demonstrate Dramatic Performance Gains

YouTuber Jeff Geerling conducted real-world testing using four M3 Ultra Mac Studio units loaned by Apple, collectively worth just under $40,000. The cluster featured a combined 1.5 terabytes of unified memory, with each Mac Studio equipped with a 32-core CPU, 80-core GPU, and 32-core Neural Engine. Running at under 250 watts apiece and remaining "almost whisper-quiet," the compact setup demonstrated the practical viability of desktop-scale AI processing.

1

Source: AppleInsider

Source: AppleInsider

Geerling's benchmarks using Exo 1.0, which supports RDMA, versus Llama.cpp, which does not, revealed striking differences. Testing the Qwen3 235B model showed Exo improving from 19.5 tokens per second on a single node to 31.9 tokens per second across four nodes. In contrast, Llama's performance degraded from 20.4 to 15.2 tokens per second as nodes increased. Similar results emerged with DeepSeek V3.1 671B, where Exo achieved 32.5 tokens per second on four nodes compared to 21.1 on a single node.

1

Perhaps most impressive was the successful execution of Kimi K2 Thinking 1T A32B, a one-trillion-parameter model too large for a single Mac Studio with 512GB memory. Across four nodes, Exo delivered 28.3 tokens per second, demonstrating that Apple Silicon clusters can handle models previously accessible only through enterprise-grade infrastructure.

1

Apple's Unified Memory Architecture Provides Cost Advantage

The unified memory architecture inherent to Apple Silicon creates a distinct advantage for accelerating AI workflows. As Alex Ziskind demonstrated, running machine learning tasks on Apple Silicon proves more cost-effective than using NVIDIA's RTX 4090 for less complex operations. The M4 Pro Mac mini offers 64GB of unified memory compared to the RTX 4090's 24GB, and when multiple Mac mini or Mac Studio devices connect via Thunderbolt 5, this pooled memory scales rapidly.

2

The cost comparison becomes compelling when examining equivalent memory configurations. Geerling's four-Mac Studio cluster with approximately 1.5TB of memory cost roughly $40,000. Achieving the same memory capacity by clustering NVIDIA DGX Spark units would require 12 devices at approximately $4,000 each, totaling $48,000—an $8,000 disadvantage for NVIDIA.

2

MLX Distributed Framework and Exo 1.0 Enable Accessible AI Development

Apple's MLX Distributed Framework, specifically designed to maximize Apple Silicon potential, integrates seamlessly with RDMA to accelerate both model training and inference. The framework supports dense and quantized models, providing flexibility for various AI applications. Combined with Exo 1.0's tensor parallelism—which divides large AI models into smaller segments for simultaneous processing—the ecosystem removes technical barriers that previously made distributed computing inaccessible to many developers and AI researchers.

3

Exo 1.0's user-friendly installer and real-time dashboard provide detailed insights into cluster performance, making distributed machine learning more approachable. This democratization of advanced AI capabilities means researchers and businesses can experiment with and deploy large language models locally, maintaining data control while reducing operational expenses associated with cloud-based solutions.

3

Source: Wccftech

Source: Wccftech

Rising Memory Prices Threaten Apple's Competitive Position

Despite these technical advances, Apple's cost advantage faces significant headwinds. The company's long-term agreements with major memory suppliers including Samsung and SK Hynix are set to expire as soon as January 2026. Industry observers anticipate substantial price increases as these suppliers renegotiate terms, potentially eroding or eliminating the $8,000 cost advantage Apple currently holds over comparable NVIDIA configurations.

2

This pricing pressure could significantly impact upcoming M5-based Mac mini and Mac Studio devices, potentially making Apple's clustering solution less attractive compared to traditional GPU-based alternatives. For organizations planning long-term AI infrastructure investments, this uncertainty introduces risk into what otherwise appears to be a compelling technical solution.

Limitations and Future Considerations for Mac Cluster Deployments

While Thunderbolt 5 RDMA support represents a substantial leap forward, the technology carries inherent limitations. The absence of a Thunderbolt 5 networking switch means Mac Studio or Mac mini units must be daisy-chained, severely restricting cluster size before network latency degrades performance. This constraint makes Apple's solution most viable for small to medium-scale deployments rather than large enterprise clusters.

1

AI researchers and developers should monitor how Apple addresses scaling challenges and whether third-party networking solutions emerge. The current implementation works exceptionally well for teams needing to run models that exceed single-device memory capacity but don't require dozens of nodes. As model sizes continue growing and memory prices potentially increase, the window for Apple's cost-effective clustering advantage may narrow, making near-term adoption particularly attractive for organizations seeking alternatives to cloud infrastructure.

[1]

AppleInsider

|

AppleInsider.com

Today's Top Stories

TheOutpost.ai

Your Daily Dose of Curated AI News

Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.

© 2025 Triveous Technologies Private Limited
Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo