OpenAI Whistleblowers Allege Illegal Non-Disclosure Agreements in SEC Complaint

Read the letter OpenAI whistleblowers sent to the SEC calling for action on NDAs

This story is available exclusively to Business Insider subscribers. Become an Insider and start reading now. Have an account? Log in. The letter states that the whistleblowers provided documents to the SEC supporting their claims that OpenAI's NDAs "violated numerous precedents of the SEC." Sen. Grassley said in a statement shared with Business Insider that assessing the threats posed by AI fell under Congress's constitutional responsibility to protect national security. He added: "OpenAI's policies and practices appear to cast a chilling effect on whistleblowers' right to speak up and receive due compensation for their protected disclosures. In order for the federal government to stay one step ahead of artificial intelligence, OpenAI's nondisclosure agreements must change." OpenAI didn't respond to a request for comment from BI. An SEC representative said: "The SEC does not comment on the existence or nonexistence of a possible whistleblower submission." The whistleblowers' complaint comes after Vox reported in May that OpenAI could take back vested equity from departing employees if they did not sign non-disparagement agreements. Sam Altman said on X shortly after the report was published that he "did not know this was happening." Nine former and current OpenAI employees signed an open letter in June calling on major AI firms to ensure greater transparency and better protections for whistleblowers. William Saunders, a former OpenAI employee who quit earlier this year after losing confidence that the company could responsibly mitigate AI risks, previously told BI about what led to him signing the letter and speaking out. He said an incident in which another former OpenAI employee, Leopold Aschenbrenner, was fired and the requirement that OpenAI staff sign NDAs led to the four principles set out in the June open letter.

Whistleblowers Accuse OpenAI of Illegally Restrictive Contracts

OpenAI whistleblowers wrote to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), alleging that the AI startup enforced stringent employment and nondisclosure contracts on its workers, possibly resulting in penalties against staff who raise concerns about AI safety, The Washington Post reported. OpenAI allegedly made staff sign employee agreements that required them to waive their federal rights to whistleblower compensation, while also requiring prior consent from the company if employees wished to disclose information to authorities. The letter urged the SEC to take action against OpenAI for potentially illegal nondisclosure agreements. It also called for the company to disclose all relevant agreements, inform employees of violations and their right to report them, and face fines for each improper agreement. Senior staff at the company have raised several concerns in the past about OpenAI's safety procedures and lack of protection for whistleblowers. Last month, a group of former and current employees at frontier AI companies like OpenAI and Google wrote an open letter asking for greater whistleblower protections for those who raise the alarm about the dangers of AI. These dangers range from further entrenchment of existing inequalities to manipulation and misinformation to uncontrolled AI systems resulting in human extinction. The letter asked AI companies to refrain from enforcing restrictive employment contracts and facilitate an anonymous system for raising safety concerns. In the same vein, last month a former OpenAI employee claimed he was fired for raising security concerns to the company's board. He alleged that the company's management was displeased with an internal memo he wrote on OpenAI's security policies, which he felt were "egregiously insufficient" in protecting model weights or key algorithmic secrets from theft by foreign actors. Earlier this year, the AI startup saw several key employees working on AI safety concerns like Ilya Sutskever and Jan Leike resign, with the latter accusing OpenAI of prioritising "shiny" products over safety culture and processes.