Over half of US teens use AI nudification tools to create sexual images, new study reveals

2 Sources

Share

A groundbreaking study from George Mason University reveals that 55% of American teenagers have used AI-powered nudification apps to create sexualized images. The research exposes widespread non-consensual image creation, with more than a third of teens reporting victimization. The findings challenge assumptions about gender differences in such behavior and raise urgent questions about consent in the AI era.

Teens and AI: Widespread Use of Nudification Tools Uncovered

More than half of American teenagers have used artificial intelligence tools to generate nude or sexualized images, according to research published in the journal PLOS One by Dr. Chad M.S. Steel, a digital forensics researcher at George Mason University who studies technology-facilitated crimes against children

1

2

. The January 2025 survey of 557 English-speaking adolescents ages 13 to 17 found that 55.3% of respondents reported using AI-powered nudification apps to create at least one image of themselves or others, while 54.4% said they had received AI-generated nude images

1

.

AI Nudification Becomes the New Form of Sexting

These AI-powered nudification apps allow users to create and share sexualized images by uploading a photograph of a person, effectively "undressing" them through artificial intelligence

1

. Steel characterizes the phenomenon bluntly: "Teens are no longer just digital natives but AI-natives. 'Nudification' and GenAI apps are their new 'sexting,' only with more challenging issues surrounding consent"

2

. The critical difference from traditional sexting is that these tools don't require a willing participant—anyone with access to a photo can generate sexualized images without the subject's knowledge or permission

2

.

Source: Mashable

Source: Mashable

Non-Consensual Image Creation Affects Over a Third of Teens

The study reveals disturbing patterns of non-consensual image creation among adolescents. More than 36% of teens reported that someone had created a sexualized AI image of them without their consent, and 33.2% said such images were shared without their permission

1

2

. These victims experience consequences similar to other forms of child sexual exploitation material, including dehumanization and lasting disruption to their lives

2

.

Teen Girls Use AI Tools at Surprising Rates

The findings surprised Steel, who noted that males typically show stronger engagement in online sexual activities, including sexting and viewing pornographic material

1

. However, roughly 1 in 6 teen girls and teen boys used nudification tools frequently to see how they looked, and about the same share of teen girls shared such imagery "once or twice" with someone else—rates nearly identical to boys

1

. Steel suspects that the popularity of "try it on" clothing and makeup visualization tools among girls builds familiarity with similar technology. Combined with male coercion for sexually explicit imagery, teen girls may find themselves using familiar technology to deal with pressure .

Psychological Impact on Victims and Future Implications

Dr. Linda Charmaraman, director of the Youth, Media, & Wellbeing Research Lab at Wellesley College, emphasized that teens are in a delicate developmental period as they form identities and seek social connection. "When you combine that time of development with AI, it can bring further risks," she noted, explaining that pressure to create certain content to fit in with peers and promote social status may drive usage

1

. While boys did report higher usage of generative AI to create and distribute sexual imagery both with and without permission, the gender gap was smaller than expected

1

.

What Lawmakers and Educators Should Watch

The timing of this research coincides with broader debates about AI and adult content, as OpenAI CEO Sam Altman pushes to release an "adult version" of ChatGPT while Elon Musk advocates allowing Grok to generate R-rated content

2

. Steel acknowledges he would like to see his results replicated among a much larger sample, stating, "In this case, I'd love to find out that I had an extremely unusual subset"

1

. Charmaraman noted that while the survey's nationally representative sample and quality checks reached diverse households, the way it was advertised could have attracted technology-savvy participants

1

. The hope is that these findings will prompt lawmakers and educators to act before the problem becomes even more difficult to address, particularly around issues of consent and the unique challenges posed by teens using AI tools

2

.

Today's Top Stories

TheOutpost.ai

Your Daily Dose of Curated AI News

Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.

© 2026 Triveous Technologies Private Limited
Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo