4 Sources
4 Sources
[1]
Pentagon-funded research at colleges has aided the Chinese military, a House GOP report says
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Over a recent two-year period, the Pentagon funded hundreds of projects done in collaboration with universities in China and institutes linked to that nation's defense industry, including many blacklisted by the U.S. government for working with the Chinese military, a congressional investigation has found. The report, released Friday by House Republicans on the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, argues the projects have allowed China to exploit U.S. research partnerships for military gains while the two countries are locked in a tech and arms rivalry. "American taxpayer dollars should be used to defend the nation -- not strengthen its foremost strategic competitor," Republicans wrote in the report. "Failing to safeguard American research from hostile foreign exploitation will continue to erode U.S. technological dominance and place our national defense capabilities at risk," it said. The Pentagon didn't immediately respond to an Associated Press request for comment. Beijing has in the past said science and technological cooperation between the two countries is mutually beneficial and helps the two sides cope with global challenges. The congressional report said some officials at the Defense Department argued research should remain open as long as it is "neither controlled nor classified." The report makes several recommendations to scale back U.S. research collaboration with China. It also backs new legislation proposed by the committee's chairman, Rep. John Moolenaar, R-Michigan. The bill would prohibit any Defense Department funding from going to projects done in collaboration with researchers affiliated with Chinese entities that the U.S. government identifies as safety risks. Republicans say the joint research could have military applications The 80-page report builds on the committee's findings last year that partnerships between U.S. and Chinese universities over the past decade allowed hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding to help Beijing develop critical technology. Amid pressure from Republicans, several U.S. universities have ended their joint programs with Chinese schools in recent years. The new report focuses more narrowly on the Defense Department and its billions of dollars in annual research funding. The committee's investigation identified 1,400 research papers published between June 2023 and June 2025 that acknowledged support from the Pentagon and were done in collaboration with Chinese partners. The publications were funded by some 700 defense grants worth more than $2.5 billion. Of the 1,400 publications, more than half involved organizations affiliated with China's defense research and industrial base. Dozens of those organizations were flagged for potential security concerns on U.S. government lists, though federal law does not prohibit research collaborations with them. The Defense Department money supported research in fields including hypersonic technology, semiconductors, artificial intelligence, advanced materials and next-generation propulsion. Many of the projects have clear military applications, according to the report. In one case, a nuclear scientist at Carnegie Science, a research institution in Washington, worked extensively on Pentagon-backed research while holding appointments at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Hefei Institute of Physical Sciences. The scientist, who has done research on high-energy materials, nitrogen and high-pressure physics -- all of which are relevant to nuclear weapons development -- has been honored in China for his work to advance the country's national development goals, the report said. It called the case "a deeply troubling example" of how Beijing can leverage U.S. taxpayer-funded research to further its weapons development. In another Pentagon-backed project, Arizona State University and the University of Texas partnered with researchers from Shanghai Jiao Tong University and Beihang University to study high-stakes decision-making in uncertain environments, which has direct applications for electronic warfare and cyber defense, the report said. The money came from the Office of Naval Research, the Army Research Office and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Shanghai university is under the supervision of a central Chinese agency tasked with developing defense technology, and Beihang University, in the capital city of Beijing, is linked to the People's Liberation Army and known for its aerospace programs. Calls for scaling back research collaborations The report takes issue with Defense Department policies that do not explicitly forbid research partnerships with foreign institutions that appear on U.S. government blacklists. It makes more than a dozen recommendations, including a prohibition on any Pentagon research collaboration with entities that are on U.S. blacklists or "known to be part of China's defense research and industrial base." Moolenaar's legislation includes a similar provision and proposes a ban on Defense Department funding for U.S. universities that operate joint institutes with Chinese universities. A senior Education Department official said the report "highlights the vulnerability of federally funded research to foreign infiltration on America's campuses." Under Secretary of Education Nicholas Kent said the findings reinforce the need for more transparency around U.S. universities' international ties, along with a "whole-of-government approach to safeguard against the malign influence of hostile foreign actors." House investigators said they are not seeking to end all academic and research collaborations with China but those with connections to the Chinese military and its research and industrial base.
[2]
Pentagon-funded research at colleges has aided the Chinese military, a House GOP report says
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Over a recent two-year period, the Pentagon funded hundreds of projects done in collaboration with universities in China and institutes linked to that nation's defense industry, including many blacklisted by the U.S. government for working with the Chinese military, a congressional investigation has found. The report, released Friday by House Republicans on the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, argues the projects have allowed China to exploit U.S. research partnerships for military gains while the two countries are locked in a tech and arms rivalry. "American taxpayer dollars should be used to defend the nation -- not strengthen its foremost strategic competitor," Republicans wrote in the report. "Failing to safeguard American research from hostile foreign exploitation will continue to erode U.S. technological dominance and place our national defense capabilities at risk," it said. The Pentagon and didn't immediately respond to an Associated Press request for comment. The congressional report said some officials at the Defense Department argued research should remain open as long as it is "neither controlled nor classified." The report makes several recommendations to scale back U.S. research collaboration with China. It also backs new legislation proposed by the committee's chairman, Rep. John Moolenaar, R-Michigan. The bill would prohibit any Defense Department funding from going to projects done in collaboration with researchers affiliated with Chinese entities that the U.S. government identifies as safety risks. Beijing has in the past said science and technological cooperation between the two countries is mutually beneficial and helps them cope with global challenges. The Chinese Embassy did not immediately respond to a request for comment Friday. Republicans say the joint research could have military applications The 80-page report builds on the committee's findings last year that partnerships between U.S. and Chinese universities over the past decade allowed hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding to help Beijing develop critical technology. Amid pressure from Republicans, several U.S. universities have ended their joint programs with Chinese schools in recent years. The new report focuses more narrowly on the Defense Department and its billions of dollars in annual research funding. The committee's investigation identified 1,400 research papers published between June 2023 and June 2025 that acknowledged support from the Pentagon and were done in collaboration with Chinese partners. The publications were funded by some 700 defense grants worth more than $2.5 billion. Of the 1,400 publications, more than half involved organizations affiliated with China's defense research and industrial base. Dozens of those organizations were flagged for potential security concerns on U.S. government lists, though federal law does not prohibit research collaborations with them. The Defense Department money supported research in fields including hypersonic technology, semiconductors, artificial intelligence, advanced materials and next-generation propulsion. Many of the projects have clear military applications, according to the report. In one case, a nuclear scientist at Carnegie Science, a research institution in Washington, worked extensively on Pentagon-backed research while holding appointments at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Hefei Institute of Physical Sciences. The scientist, who has done research on high-energy materials, nitrogen and high-pressure physics -- all of which are relevant to nuclear weapons development -- has been honored in China for his work to advance the country's national development goals, the report said. It called the case "a deeply troubling example" of how Beijing can leverage U.S. taxpayer-funded research to further its weapons development. In another Pentagon-backed project, Arizona State University and the University of Texas partnered with researchers from Shanghai Jiao Tong University and Beihang University to study high-stakes decision-making in uncertain environments, which has direct applications for electronic warfare and cyber defense, the report said. The money came from the Office of Naval Research, the Army Research Office and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Shanghai university is under the supervision of a central Chinese agency tasked with developing defense technology, and Beihang University, in the capital city of Beijing, is linked to the People's Liberation Army and known for its aerospace programs. Calls for scaling back research collaborations The report takes issue with Defense Department policies that do not explicitly forbid research partnerships with foreign institutions that appear on U.S. government blacklists. It makes more than a dozen recommendations, including a prohibition on any Pentagon research collaboration with entities that are on U.S. blacklists or "known to be part of China's defense research and industrial base." Moolenaar's legislation includes a similar provision and proposes a ban on Defense Department funding for U.S. universities that operate joint institutes with Chinese universities. A senior Education Department official said the report "highlights the vulnerability of federally funded research to foreign infiltration on America's campuses." Under Secretary of Education Nicholas Kent said the findings reinforce the need for more transparency around U.S. universities' international ties, along with a "whole-of-government approach to safeguard against the malign influence of hostile foreign actors." House investigators said they are not seeking to end all academic and research collaborations with China but those with connections to the Chinese military and its research and industrial base.
[3]
Pentagon-funded research at colleges has aided the Chinese military, a House GOP report says
WASHINGTON -- Over a recent two-year period, the Pentagon funded hundreds of projects done in collaboration with universities in China and institutes linked to that nation's defense industry, including many blacklisted by the U.S. government for working with the Chinese military, a congressional investigation has found. The report, released Friday by House Republicans on the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, argues the projects have allowed China to exploit U.S. research partnerships for military gains while the two countries are locked in a tech and arms rivalry. "American taxpayer dollars should be used to defend the nation -- not strengthen its foremost strategic competitor," Republicans wrote in the report. "Failing to safeguard American research from hostile foreign exploitation will continue to erode U.S. technological dominance and place our national defense capabilities at risk," it said. The Pentagon didn't immediately respond to an Associated Press request for comment. Beijing has in the past said science and technological cooperation between the two countries is mutually beneficial and helps the two sides cope with global challenges. The congressional report said some officials at the Defense Department argued research should remain open as long as it is "neither controlled nor classified." The report makes several recommendations to scale back U.S. research collaboration with China. It also backs new legislation proposed by the committee's chairman, Rep. John Moolenaar, R-Michigan. The bill would prohibit any Defense Department funding from going to projects done in collaboration with researchers affiliated with Chinese entities that the U.S. government identifies as safety risks. The 80-page report builds on the committee's findings last year that partnerships between U.S. and Chinese universities over the past decade allowed hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding to help Beijing develop critical technology. Amid pressure from Republicans, several U.S. universities have ended their joint programs with Chinese schools in recent years. The new report focuses more narrowly on the Defense Department and its billions of dollars in annual research funding. The committee's investigation identified 1,400 research papers published between June 2023 and June 2025 that acknowledged support from the Pentagon and were done in collaboration with Chinese partners. The publications were funded by some 700 defense grants worth more than $2.5 billion. Of the 1,400 publications, more than half involved organizations affiliated with China's defense research and industrial base. Dozens of those organizations were flagged for potential security concerns on U.S. government lists, though federal law does not prohibit research collaborations with them. The Defense Department money supported research in fields including hypersonic technology, semiconductors, artificial intelligence, advanced materials and next-generation propulsion. Many of the projects have clear military applications, according to the report. In one case, a nuclear scientist at Carnegie Science, a research institution in Washington, worked extensively on Pentagon-backed research while holding appointments at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Hefei Institute of Physical Sciences. The scientist, who has done research on high-energy materials, nitrogen and high-pressure physics -- all of which are relevant to nuclear weapons development -- has been honored in China for his work to advance the country's national development goals, the report said. It called the case "a deeply troubling example" of how Beijing can leverage U.S. taxpayer-funded research to further its weapons development. In another Pentagon-backed project, Arizona State University and the University of Texas partnered with researchers from Shanghai Jiao Tong University and Beihang University to study high-stakes decision-making in uncertain environments, which has direct applications for electronic warfare and cyber defense, the report said. The money came from the Office of Naval Research, the Army Research Office and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Shanghai university is under the supervision of a central Chinese agency tasked with developing defense technology, and Beihang University, in the capital city of Beijing, is linked to the People's Liberation Army and known for its aerospace programs. The report takes issue with Defense Department policies that do not explicitly forbid research partnerships with foreign institutions that appear on U.S. government blacklists. It makes more than a dozen recommendations, including a prohibition on any Pentagon research collaboration with entities that are on U.S. blacklists or "known to be part of China's defense research and industrial base." Moolenaar's legislation includes a similar provision and proposes a ban on Defense Department funding for U.S. universities that operate joint institutes with Chinese universities. A senior Education Department official said the report "highlights the vulnerability of federally funded research to foreign infiltration on America's campuses." Under Secretary of Education Nicholas Kent said the findings reinforce the need for more transparency around U.S. universities' international ties, along with a "whole-of-government approach to safeguard against the malign influence of hostile foreign actors." House investigators said they are not seeking to end all academic and research collaborations with China but those with connections to the Chinese military and its research and industrial base.
[4]
Pentagon-Funded Research at Colleges Has Aided the Chinese Military, a House GOP Report Says
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Over a recent two-year period, the Pentagon funded hundreds of projects done in collaboration with universities in China and institutes linked to that nation's defense industry, including many blacklisted by the U.S. government for working with the Chinese military, a congressional investigation has found. The report, released Friday by House Republicans on the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, argues the projects have allowed China to exploit U.S. research partnerships for military gains while the two countries are locked in a tech and arms rivalry. "American taxpayer dollars should be used to defend the nation -- not strengthen its foremost strategic competitor," Republicans wrote in the report. "Failing to safeguard American research from hostile foreign exploitation will continue to erode U.S. technological dominance and place our national defense capabilities at risk," it said. The Pentagon didn't immediately respond to an Associated Press request for comment. Beijing has in the past said science and technological cooperation between the two countries is mutually beneficial and helps the two sides cope with global challenges. The congressional report said some officials at the Defense Department argued research should remain open as long as it is "neither controlled nor classified." The report makes several recommendations to scale back U.S. research collaboration with China. It also backs new legislation proposed by the committee's chairman, Rep. John Moolenaar, R-Michigan. The bill would prohibit any Defense Department funding from going to projects done in collaboration with researchers affiliated with Chinese entities that the U.S. government identifies as safety risks. Republicans say the joint research could have military applications The 80-page report builds on the committee's findings last year that partnerships between U.S. and Chinese universities over the past decade allowed hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding to help Beijing develop critical technology. Amid pressure from Republicans, several U.S. universities have ended their joint programs with Chinese schools in recent years. The new report focuses more narrowly on the Defense Department and its billions of dollars in annual research funding. The committee's investigation identified 1,400 research papers published between June 2023 and June 2025 that acknowledged support from the Pentagon and were done in collaboration with Chinese partners. The publications were funded by some 700 defense grants worth more than $2.5 billion. Of the 1,400 publications, more than half involved organizations affiliated with China's defense research and industrial base. Dozens of those organizations were flagged for potential security concerns on U.S. government lists, though federal law does not prohibit research collaborations with them. The Defense Department money supported research in fields including hypersonic technology, semiconductors, artificial intelligence, advanced materials and next-generation propulsion. Many of the projects have clear military applications, according to the report. In one case, a nuclear scientist at Carnegie Science, a research institution in Washington, worked extensively on Pentagon-backed research while holding appointments at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Hefei Institute of Physical Sciences. The scientist, who has done research on high-energy materials, nitrogen and high-pressure physics -- all of which are relevant to nuclear weapons development -- has been honored in China for his work to advance the country's national development goals, the report said. It called the case "a deeply troubling example" of how Beijing can leverage U.S. taxpayer-funded research to further its weapons development. In another Pentagon-backed project, Arizona State University and the University of Texas partnered with researchers from Shanghai Jiao Tong University and Beihang University to study high-stakes decision-making in uncertain environments, which has direct applications for electronic warfare and cyber defense, the report said. The money came from the Office of Naval Research, the Army Research Office and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Shanghai university is under the supervision of a central Chinese agency tasked with developing defense technology, and Beihang University, in the capital city of Beijing, is linked to the People's Liberation Army and known for its aerospace programs. Calls for scaling back research collaborations The report takes issue with Defense Department policies that do not explicitly forbid research partnerships with foreign institutions that appear on U.S. government blacklists. It makes more than a dozen recommendations, including a prohibition on any Pentagon research collaboration with entities that are on U.S. blacklists or "known to be part of China's defense research and industrial base." Moolenaar's legislation includes a similar provision and proposes a ban on Defense Department funding for U.S. universities that operate joint institutes with Chinese universities. A senior Education Department official said the report "highlights the vulnerability of federally funded research to foreign infiltration on America's campuses." Under Secretary of Education Nicholas Kent said the findings reinforce the need for more transparency around U.S. universities' international ties, along with a "whole-of-government approach to safeguard against the malign influence of hostile foreign actors." House investigators said they are not seeking to end all academic and research collaborations with China but those with connections to the Chinese military and its research and industrial base.
Share
Share
Copy Link
A House GOP report reveals that Pentagon-funded research projects at U.S. colleges have inadvertently aided Chinese military advancements, sparking calls for stricter oversight and reduced collaboration.
A recent congressional investigation has uncovered that the Pentagon has been funding hundreds of research projects in collaboration with Chinese universities and institutes, many of which are linked to China's defense industry. This revelation has sparked concerns about national security and the potential exploitation of U.S. research partnerships for military gains by China
1
2
3
4
.Source: AP NEWS
The investigation, conducted by House Republicans on the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, identified 1,400 research papers published between June 2023 and June 2025 that acknowledged Pentagon support and involved Chinese partners. These publications were funded by approximately 700 defense grants totaling over $2.5 billion
1
2
3
4
.More than half of these collaborations involved organizations affiliated with China's defense research and industrial base. The research covered critical areas such as hypersonic technology, semiconductors, artificial intelligence, advanced materials, and next-generation propulsion
1
2
3
4
.The report highlighted several troubling instances of collaboration:
A nuclear scientist at Carnegie Science in Washington worked on Pentagon-backed research while holding appointments at Chinese institutions. The scientist's research on high-energy materials and high-pressure physics has potential applications in nuclear weapons development
1
2
3
4
.A joint project involving Arizona State University, the University of Texas, and Chinese universities studied decision-making in uncertain environments, which has direct applications for electronic warfare and cyber defense
1
2
3
4
.The investigation revealed that current Defense Department policies do not explicitly prohibit research partnerships with foreign institutions on U.S. government blacklists. In response, the report makes several recommendations
1
2
3
4
:Prohibit Pentagon research collaboration with entities on U.S. blacklists or known to be part of China's defense research and industrial base.
Increase transparency around U.S. universities' international ties.
Implement a "whole-of-government approach" to safeguard against foreign influence in research.
Related Stories
Committee chairman Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Michigan) has proposed new legislation that would prohibit Defense Department funding for projects involving researchers affiliated with Chinese entities identified as security risks. The bill also suggests banning Pentagon funding for U.S. universities operating joint institutes with Chinese universities
1
2
3
4
.While the report calls for scaling back research collaborations with China, investigators emphasized that they are not seeking to end all academic and research partnerships. Instead, they aim to focus on limiting collaborations specifically connected to the Chinese military and its research and industrial base
1
2
3
4
.As tensions between the U.S. and China continue to rise in the realms of technology and arms development, this report underscores the complex challenge of balancing international scientific cooperation with national security concerns.
Summarized by
Navi
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
U.S. News & World Report
|24 Sept 2024
13 Sept 2024
30 May 2025โขPolicy and Regulation
1
Business and Economy
2
Business and Economy
3
Policy and Regulation