4 Sources
4 Sources
[1]
Political consultant defies court order in lawsuit over AI robocalls that mimicked Biden
CONCORD, N.H. (AP) -- A political consultant who sent artificial intelligence-generated robocalls mimicking former President Joe Biden to New Hampshire Democrats said Tuesday he will not pay $22,500 to three voters despite a recent federal court order. The order, issued Friday in a lawsuit brought by the League of Women Voters, came five months after a jury acquitted Kramer of voter suppression and impersonating a candidate. In the civil case, the judge entered a default judgement after Kramer failed to appear in court. "I never responded to them because I was already acquitted on 22 counts," Kramer said in an email, insisting that the lawsuit was a publicity stunt that wasted the court's time. He also has refused to pay a $6 million fine issued by the Federal Communications Commission. Though jurors sided with Kramer in the criminal trial, the judge in the civil case not only ordered him to pay $7,500 to each voter who sued but banned him from engaging in the same conduct nationwide. Caren Short, director of legal and research at the League of Women Voters, described the decision as a "critical precedent against the weaponization of artificial intelligence in elections." Plaintiffs will explore further action if Kramer doesn't pay up, said Courtney Hostetler of Free Speech for People, which provided the League with legal assistance. "Mr. Kramer has shown a consistent disregard for the law and the rights of voters," she said. "His plan to defy the court's order continues this pattern, and reinforces the importance of the injunction and the damages award." Kramer, 56, of New Orleans, admitted orchestrating a message sent to thousands of voters two days before the state's Jan. 23, 2024, presidential primary. Recipients heard an AI-generated voice similar to Biden's that suggested that voting in the primary would preclude voters from casting ballots in November. "It's important that you save your vote for the November election," voters were told. "Your votes make a difference in November, not this Tuesday." Kramer, who would have faced decades in prison if convicted, testified that he wanted to send a wake-up call about the potential dangers of AI when he paid a New Orleans magician $150 to create the recording. He said he was getting frequent calls from people using AI in campaigns, and, worried about the lack of regulations, made it his New Year's resolution to take action. "This is going to be my one good deed this year," he recalled while testifying in Belknap County Superior Court in June. Kramer argued that the primary was a meaningless straw poll, and therefore the state's voter suppression law didn't apply. The primary was held in defiance of the Democratic National Committee, which had dislodged New Hampshire from its traditional spot in the nominating calendar, though the state's delegates were still seated at the national convention. Biden did not put his name on the ballot or campaign there but won as a write-in. Lingo Telecom, the company that transmitted the calls, agreed to pay $1 million in a settlement with the FCC in August 2024. The agency, which did not respond to requests for comment, was developing AI-related rules when Donald Trump won the presidency, but it has since shown signs of a shift toward loosening regulations. And though multiple states have enacted legislation targeting the use of video or audio content that mimics candidates in political campaigns, Trump is considering pressuring states to stop regulating artificial intelligence. Trump and some Republicans argue that such regulation will dampen innovation, while critics worry about allowing big AI companies to operate with little oversight.
[2]
Political consultant defies court order in lawsuit over AI robocalls that mimicked Biden
CONCORD, N.H. -- A political consultant who sent artificial intelligence-generated robocalls mimicking former President Joe Biden to New Hampshire Democrats said Tuesday he will not pay $22,500 to three voters despite a recent federal court order. The order, issued Friday in a lawsuit brought by the League of Women Voters, came five months after a jury acquitted Steve Kramer of voter suppression and impersonating a candidate. In the civil case, the judge entered a default judgement after Kramer failed to appear in court. "I never responded to them because I was already acquitted on 22 counts," Kramer said in an email, insisting that the lawsuit was a publicity stunt that wasted the court's time. He also has refused to pay a $6 million fine issued by the Federal Communications Commission. Though jurors sided with Kramer in the criminal trial, the judge in the civil case not only ordered him to pay $7,500 to each voter who sued but banned him from engaging in the same conduct nationwide. Caren Short, director of legal and research at the League of Women Voters, described the decision as a "critical precedent against the weaponization of artificial intelligence in elections." Plaintiffs will explore further action if Kramer doesn't pay up, said Courtney Hostetler of Free Speech for People, which provided the League with legal assistance. "Mr. Kramer has shown a consistent disregard for the law and the rights of voters," she said. "His plan to defy the court's order continues this pattern, and reinforces the importance of the injunction and the damages award." Kramer, 56, of New Orleans, admitted orchestrating a message sent to thousands of voters two days before the state's Jan. 23, 2024, presidential primary. Recipients heard an AI-generated voice similar to Biden's that suggested that voting in the primary would preclude voters from casting ballots in November. "It's important that you save your vote for the November election," voters were told. "Your votes make a difference in November, not this Tuesday." Kramer, who would have faced decades in prison if convicted, testified that he wanted to send a wake-up call about the potential dangers of AI when he paid a New Orleans magician $150 to create the recording. He said he was getting frequent calls from people using AI in campaigns, and, worried about the lack of regulations, made it his New Year's resolution to take action. "This is going to be my one good deed this year," he recalled while testifying in Belknap County Superior Court in June. Kramer argued that the primary was a meaningless straw poll, and therefore the state's voter suppression law didn't apply. The primary was held in defiance of the Democratic National Committee, which had dislodged New Hampshire from its traditional spot in the nominating calendar, though the state's delegates were still seated at the national convention. Biden did not put his name on the ballot or campaign there but won as a write-in. Lingo Telecom, the company that transmitted the calls, agreed to pay $1 million in a settlement with the FCC in August 2024. The agency, which did not respond to requests for comment, was developing AI-related rules when Donald Trump won the presidency, but it has since shown signs of a shift toward loosening regulations. And though multiple states have enacted legislation targeting the use of video or audio content that mimics candidates in political campaigns, Trump is considering pressuring states to stop regulating artificial intelligence. Trump and some Republicans argue that such regulation will dampen innovation, while critics worry about allowing big AI companies to operate with little oversight. On Tuesday, attorneys general in 36 states, including New Hampshire, sent a letter to Congress opposing the preemption of state laws addressing the risks of AI.
[3]
Political consultant defies court order in lawsuit over AI robocalls that mimicked Biden
CONCORD, N.H. (AP) -- A political consultant who sent artificial intelligence-generated robocalls mimicking former President Joe Biden to New Hampshire Democrats said Tuesday he will not pay $22,500 to three voters despite a recent federal court order. The order, issued Friday in a lawsuit brought by the League of Women Voters, came five months after a jury acquitted Kramer of voter suppression and impersonating a candidate. In the civil case, the judge entered a default judgement after Kramer failed to appear in court. "I never responded to them because I was already acquitted on 22 counts," Kramer said in an email, insisting that the lawsuit was a publicity stunt that wasted the court's time. He also has refused to pay a $6 million fine issued by the Federal Communications Commission. Though jurors sided with Kramer in the criminal trial, the judge in the civil case not only ordered him to pay $7,500 to each voter who sued but banned him from engaging in the same conduct nationwide. Caren Short, director of legal and research at the League of Women Voters, described the decision as a "critical precedent against the weaponization of artificial intelligence in elections." Plaintiffs will explore further action if Kramer doesn't pay up, said Courtney Hostetler of Free Speech for People, which provided the League with legal assistance. "Mr. Kramer has shown a consistent disregard for the law and the rights of voters," she said. "His plan to defy the court's order continues this pattern, and reinforces the importance of the injunction and the damages award." Kramer, 56, of New Orleans, admitted orchestrating a message sent to thousands of voters two days before the state's Jan. 23, 2024, presidential primary. Recipients heard an AI-generated voice similar to Biden's that suggested that voting in the primary would preclude voters from casting ballots in November. "It's important that you save your vote for the November election," voters were told. "Your votes make a difference in November, not this Tuesday." Kramer, who would have faced decades in prison if convicted, testified that he wanted to send a wake-up call about the potential dangers of AI when he paid a New Orleans magician $150 to create the recording. He said he was getting frequent calls from people using AI in campaigns, and, worried about the lack of regulations, made it his New Year's resolution to take action. "This is going to be my one good deed this year," he recalled while testifying in Belknap County Superior Court in June. Kramer argued that the primary was a meaningless straw poll, and therefore the state's voter suppression law didn't apply. The primary was held in defiance of the Democratic National Committee, which had dislodged New Hampshire from its traditional spot in the nominating calendar, though the state's delegates were still seated at the national convention. Biden did not put his name on the ballot or campaign there but won as a write-in. Lingo Telecom, the company that transmitted the calls, agreed to pay $1 million in a settlement with the FCC in August 2024. The agency, which did not respond to requests for comment, was developing AI-related rules when Donald Trump won the presidency, but it has since shown signs of a shift toward loosening regulations. And though multiple states have enacted legislation targeting the use of video or audio content that mimics candidates in political campaigns, Trump is considering pressuring states to stop regulating artificial intelligence. Trump and some Republicans argue that such regulation will dampen innovation, while critics worry about allowing big AI companies to operate with little oversight.
[4]
Political Consultant Defies Court Order in Lawsuit Over AI Robocalls That Mimicked Biden
CONCORD, N.H. (AP) -- A political consultant who sent artificial intelligence-generated robocalls mimicking former President Joe Biden to New Hampshire Democrats said Tuesday he will not pay $22,500 to three voters despite a recent federal court order. The order, issued Friday in a lawsuit brought by the League of Women Voters, came five months after a jury acquitted Kramer of voter suppression and impersonating a candidate. In the civil case, the judge entered a default judgement after Kramer failed to appear in court. "I never responded to them because I was already acquitted on 22 counts," Kramer said in an email, insisting that the lawsuit was a publicity stunt that wasted the court's time. He also has refused to pay a $6 million fine issued by the Federal Communications Commission. Though jurors sided with Kramer in the criminal trial, the judge in the civil case not only ordered him to pay $7,500 to each voter who sued but banned him from engaging in the same conduct nationwide. Caren Short, director of legal and research at the League of Women Voters, described the decision as a "critical precedent against the weaponization of artificial intelligence in elections." Plaintiffs will explore further action if Kramer doesn't pay up, said Courtney Hostetler of Free Speech for People, which provided the League with legal assistance. "Mr. Kramer has shown a consistent disregard for the law and the rights of voters," she said. "His plan to defy the court's order continues this pattern, and reinforces the importance of the injunction and the damages award." Kramer, 56, of New Orleans, admitted orchestrating a message sent to thousands of voters two days before the state's Jan. 23, 2024, presidential primary. Recipients heard an AI-generated voice similar to Biden's that suggested that voting in the primary would preclude voters from casting ballots in November. "It's important that you save your vote for the November election," voters were told. "Your votes make a difference in November, not this Tuesday." Kramer, who would have faced decades in prison if convicted, testified that he wanted to send a wake-up call about the potential dangers of AI when he paid a New Orleans magician $150 to create the recording. He said he was getting frequent calls from people using AI in campaigns, and, worried about the lack of regulations, made it his New Year's resolution to take action. "This is going to be my one good deed this year," he recalled while testifying in Belknap County Superior Court in June. Kramer argued that the primary was a meaningless straw poll, and therefore the state's voter suppression law didn't apply. The primary was held in defiance of the Democratic National Committee, which had dislodged New Hampshire from its traditional spot in the nominating calendar, though the state's delegates were still seated at the national convention. Biden did not put his name on the ballot or campaign there but won as a write-in. Lingo Telecom, the company that transmitted the calls, agreed to pay $1 million in a settlement with the FCC in August 2024. The agency, which did not respond to requests for comment, was developing AI-related rules when Donald Trump won the presidency, but it has since shown signs of a shift toward loosening regulations. And though multiple states have enacted legislation targeting the use of video or audio content that mimics candidates in political campaigns, Trump is considering pressuring states to stop regulating artificial intelligence. Trump and some Republicans argue that such regulation will dampen innovation, while critics worry about allowing big AI companies to operate with little oversight.
Share
Share
Copy Link
Steve Kramer refuses to pay $22,500 in civil damages for AI-generated robocalls mimicking President Biden during New Hampshire's 2024 primary, despite being acquitted in criminal court. The case highlights growing concerns about AI misuse in elections amid shifting regulatory landscapes.
Political consultant Steve Kramer has announced he will not comply with a federal court order requiring him to pay $22,500 in damages to three New Hampshire voters who sued over AI-generated robocalls that mimicked President Joe Biden's voice
1
. The 56-year-old New Orleans consultant dismissed the civil lawsuit as a "publicity stunt" despite the court's Friday ruling in favor of the League of Women Voters.
Source: AP
The federal judge entered a default judgment after Kramer failed to appear in court, ordering him to pay $7,500 to each of the three plaintiffs who brought the civil case . The ruling came five months after a jury acquitted Kramer of criminal charges including voter suppression and impersonating a candidate, a distinction Kramer uses to justify his refusal to pay the civil penalties.
Kramer orchestrated the controversial robocall campaign two days before New Hampshire's January 23, 2024, presidential primary, sending AI-generated messages to thousands of Democratic voters
3
. The synthetic voice, designed to sound like Biden, delivered a misleading message suggesting that voting in the primary would prevent recipients from casting ballots in the November general election."It's important that you save your vote for the November election," the fake Biden voice told voters. "Your votes make a difference in November, not this Tuesday"
4
. Kramer admitted to paying a New Orleans magician $150 to create the recording, claiming his motivation was to highlight the dangers of unregulated AI technology in political campaigns.Caren Short, director of legal and research at the League of Women Voters, characterized the court's decision as establishing a "critical precedent against the weaponization of artificial intelligence in elections"
1
. The ruling not only imposed financial penalties but also included a nationwide injunction preventing Kramer from engaging in similar conduct in the future.Courtney Hostetler of Free Speech for People, which provided legal assistance to the League, indicated that plaintiffs would explore additional enforcement actions if Kramer continues his defiance. "Mr. Kramer has shown a consistent disregard for the law and the rights of voters," she stated, emphasizing that his refusal to comply "reinforces the importance of the injunction and the damages award" .
Related Stories
The case unfolds against a backdrop of evolving AI regulation at both federal and state levels. Lingo Telecom, the company that transmitted Kramer's robocalls, agreed to pay $1 million in a separate FCC settlement in August 2024
3
. Kramer has also refused to pay a separate $6 million fine imposed by the Federal Communications Commission.The regulatory environment faces potential significant changes under the Trump administration, which is reportedly considering pressuring states to reduce AI regulation. This approach reflects Republican arguments that excessive regulation could stifle innovation, while critics express concerns about allowing AI companies to operate with minimal oversight
4
.In response to these federal developments, attorneys general from 36 states, including New Hampshire, sent a letter to Congress opposing the preemption of state laws designed to address AI risks . Multiple states have already enacted legislation specifically targeting the use of AI-generated audio or video content that mimics political candidates in campaign communications.
Summarized by
Navi
[2]
[3]
05 Jun 2025•Technology

14 Jun 2025•Technology

27 Sept 2024

1
Business and Economy

2
Technology

3
Policy and Regulation
