2 Sources
2 Sources
[1]
'Trust is at an all-time low for both job seekers and recruiters': Hiring platform CEO says talent acquisition is in an 'AI doom loop' | Fortune
AI has served as a vehicle to streamline workflows and automate routine labor -- but it's also bogging down the job search process for both applicants and recruiters in a competitive labor market. Candidates are looking to cut through the noise by tricking AI filters, while recruiters are drowning in a flood of applications, and companies are posting ghost jobs. The result is an authenticity crisis, according to Daniel Chait, CEO of hiring platform Greenhouse. "This is the first time I can remember where both sides were unhappy," he told Fortune. "Employers are basically saying, 'It's really hard to make a hire because we get overwhelmed with tons of applicants and we can't really tell which ones we should pay attention to.' And job seekers are saying, 'It's easier than ever to apply for jobs, but it's harder and harder to get a job.'" The 2025 Greenhouse AI in Hiring Report shared with Fortune and published Tuesday found that only 8% of job seekers believe AI algorithms that screen initial applications make hiring fairer. Across all 1,200 U.S. job seekers polled, almost half said their trust in hiring has decreased over the past year, with the share rising to 62% among U.S. Gen Z entry-level workers. Among the respondents who have lost trust in hiring, 42% blame AI directly. Plus, more than a third of job seekers think AI has shifted bias from humans to algorithms. At the same time, Greenhouse's report found that nearly half of job seekers are submitting more applications this year, an AI-assisted trend that Chait called an "AI doom loop." "Trust is at an all-time low for both job seekers and recruiters," he said. Three in four of U.S. job seekers use AI to polish their applications, and 87% say it's important for employers to be transparent about their own AI use, which is largely missing, according to the report. But as more job seekers utilize AI to tailor their applications, it actually has an opposite effect, Chait said: Instead of making candidates stand out by using the job description as a roadmap for application materials, AI tools end up spitting out similar-sounding cover letters and resumes. "You end up basically not being able to tell anyone apart," Chait said. Job seekers are disillusioned, but AI isn't helping them Rapid adoption of AI tools for job applicants is "a result of the fact that for years candidates have felt short-changed by the way recruitment has been done," said Paddy Lambros, CEO of Dex, an AI career agent technology company. Applicant fatigue is evidenced by social media posts advising job seekers on how to trick and bypass AI filters that are often used by applicant-tracking systems, he told Fortune.. "If you feel like every application you send is kind of a meaningless thing that no one's going to read anyway, then sure, why wouldn't you use AI to kind of spam it out?" Lambros said. But AI tools rarely help applicants past the initial screening, he warned. At his last job as a talent director at London-based venture capital firm Atomico, Lambros said his team was approached earlier this year by companies suddenly inundated with four to five times more job applications than they had just a month prior. But among the influx of applications, most CVs were simple and nearly identical, as AI tools built them off the job descriptions rather than genuinely representing individual candidates. This made it hard to discern if the candidate was really qualified for the role. In addition, Lambros said many applicants would show up to job interviews not even sure what the company did as they used AI to "spray and pray," sending out thousands of applications each day. Greenhouse's report details the scope of this issue, finding that 65% of U.S. hiring managers have caught applicants using AI deceptively through practices like reading from AI-generated scripts, hiding prompts in resumes to bypass initial screening, or showing up as deepfakes. The report says U.S. job seekers may consider the use of AI as "leveling the playing field" as companies and recruiters increasingly lean on AI to filter applicants. But 74% of hiring managers say they are more fearful of fraud than a year ago. "I can understand the desire for candidates" to use AI tools, Lambros said. "I just don't think it's very effective." Who's using AI to apply? Among U.S. job seekers, 41% admit to using prompt injections, or hidden text designed to bypass AI filters, Greenhouse's report found. Of those who don't, over half say they are considering it. The report also found that among candidates using prompt injections, the tactic is most common in IT at 65% and banking or finance at 54%. But as the tactics become more widespread, so does AI in the hiring process. Over half of candidates have encountered AI-led interviews, further making the process impersonal. "AI usage in first-round interviews is downright insulting and inhumane," Lambros said. "To be told it's not worth sending a human to speak to you is a pretty poor signal." AI's power for good But Lambros said AI in the hiring process isn't all bad -- when it's utilized correctly. Harnessing AI to help seek out the right jobs instead of sifting through every job posting on the internet is one good use of AI for job seekers, he said. His company's AI tools help connect candidates with job postings that reflect their personal and career goals and act more as a career coach. "I think that that's really the future of hiring. It's less about pipelines, and it's more about highly accurate matchmaking," Lambros said. Still, Greenhouse's Chait said something has to change and thinks humanity must be brought back into the process. "The solution has to come from better ways to bring out the real interest and the real meaning behind job applications and job postings," he added.
[2]
AI Is Making It Easier to Apply for -- and Harder to Find -- a Job Than Ever
Greenhouse CEO Daniel Chait called the process of applying for more jobs with AI to get past AI filters an "AI doom loop." AI, a technology that aims to simplify tasks, is complicating the job market for both applicants and recruiters. Recruiters are flooded with applications, while candidates are trying to find ways to get around AI filters, Daniel Chait, CEO of hiring platform Greenhouse, told Fortune on Tuesday. Meanwhile, nearly one in three job postings are for ghost jobs that never materialize into real employment opportunities, according to an analysis published earlier this month. "This is the first time I can remember where both sides were unhappy," Chait told Fortune. "Employers are basically saying, 'It's really hard to make a hire because we get overwhelmed with tons of applicants and we can't really tell which ones we should pay attention to.' And job seekers are saying, 'It's easier than ever to apply for jobs, but it's harder and harder to get a job.'" The Greenhouse 2025 AI in Hiring Report, published on Tuesday, surveyed over 1,200 U.S. job seekers and found that almost half said their trust in hiring has diminished over the past year. Nearly half (42%) blame AI for that loss in trust, while over a third think that AI has shifted hiring bias from humans to algorithms. Related: LinkedIn's AI Writing Tool Isn't as 'Popular' as the CEO Thought It Would Be Meanwhile, nearly three in four candidates are using AI to job hunt, and 49% of job seekers are now applying for more positions just to get past automated filters. Chait called the process of applying for more jobs with AI to get past AI an "AI doom loop." Chait explains that as more candidates use AI to hone their applications, the technology churns out similar cover letters and resumes for jobs, which creates a field of almost-identical candidates. The move increases competition, making it harder for genuine candidates to stand out. "You end up basically not being able to tell anyone apart," he told Fortune. Related: AI Is Dramatically Decreasing Entry-Level Hiring at Big Tech Companies The number of job applicants has also been rising due to AI. The New York Times pinpoints that LinkedIn job applications have grown more than 45% over the past year, partially because of increased use of AI tools. Companies are adding AI to the hiring process by leaning on AI to filter candidates. According to the World Economic Forum, approximately 90% of employers now use AI to filter or rank resumes. Chait thinks that humanity needs to be brought back to recruitment to mend the breach in trust. "Trust is at an all-time low for both job seekers and recruiters," he told Fortune.
Share
Share
Copy Link
AI tools meant to streamline hiring have created an authenticity crisis, with job seekers using AI to bypass filters while recruiters struggle with floods of identical applications. Trust between candidates and employers has hit an all-time low.
The modern job market has entered what Daniel Chait, CEO of hiring platform Greenhouse, describes as an "AI doom loop" – a vicious cycle where artificial intelligence tools meant to streamline recruitment have instead created unprecedented challenges for both job seekers and employers
1
.
Source: Fortune
According to Greenhouse's 2025 AI in Hiring Report, which surveyed over 1,200 U.S. job seekers, nearly half reported that their trust in the hiring process has decreased over the past year. Among Gen Z entry-level workers, this figure jumps to 62%
1
. The crisis stems from a fundamental mismatch: while AI was supposed to make hiring more efficient, it has instead created an arms race between job seekers using AI to craft applications and employers using AI to filter them.The widespread adoption of AI tools has led to what industry experts call an authenticity crisis. Three-quarters of U.S. job seekers now use AI to polish their applications, but this has had an unintended consequence
1
. As Chait explains, AI tools generate similar-sounding cover letters and resumes by using job descriptions as templates, making it nearly impossible to distinguish between candidates.Paddy Lambros, CEO of AI career agent technology company Dex and former talent director at London-based venture capital firm Atomico, witnessed this phenomenon firsthand. His team was approached by companies suddenly receiving four to five times more applications than just a month prior, but most CVs were "simple and nearly identical"
1
.The report reveals alarming trends in deceptive AI usage. Among U.S. job seekers, 41% admit to using prompt injections – hidden text designed to bypass AI filters – with over half of those who don't currently use this tactic considering it
1
. These tactics are most prevalent in IT (65%) and banking or finance (54%).More concerning is that 65% of U.S. hiring managers have caught applicants using AI deceptively through various methods including reading from AI-generated scripts during interviews, hiding prompts in resumes, or even appearing as deepfakes
1
. This has led to 74% of hiring managers reporting increased fears of fraud compared to a year ago.Related Stories
The scope of AI integration in recruitment is staggering. According to the World Economic Forum, approximately 90% of employers now use AI to filter or rank resumes
2
. Meanwhile, LinkedIn has reported job applications growing more than 45% over the past year, partially attributed to increased AI tool usage2
.This surge in applications, however, hasn't translated to better hiring outcomes. Nearly half of job seekers are now submitting more applications than before, creating what Chait terms the "AI doom loop" – a cycle where increased AI usage by both sides paradoxically makes the process less effective for everyone involved
2
.The proliferation of AI in hiring has created a deeply impersonal experience. Over half of candidates have encountered AI-led interviews, which Lambros describes as "downright insulting and inhumane"
1
. Many applicants arrive at interviews without even understanding what the company does, having used AI to "spray and pray" thousands of applications daily.Despite 87% of job seekers believing it's important for employers to be transparent about their AI use, such transparency remains largely absent from the hiring process
1
. Only 8% of job seekers believe AI algorithms make hiring fairer, while more than a third think AI has simply shifted bias from humans to algorithms.The current state represents an unprecedented situation where, as Chait notes, "both sides were unhappy" – employers struggle to identify qualified candidates among floods of similar applications, while job seekers find it easier to apply but harder than ever to actually secure employment
1
.Summarized by
Navi