White House accused of AI image manipulation after activist releases contradicting arrest video

2 Sources

Share

Minnesota civil rights attorney Nekima Levy Armstrong released video of her arrest after the White House posted manipulated images on social media. The original footage shows no crying, contradicting AI-altered photos shared by officials. The incident raises concerns about government use of artificial intelligence to shape public narratives around political dissent.

White House Posts Manipulated Image of Minnesota Activist

The White House sparked controversy after posting what appears to be an AI-altered image of Nekima Levy Armstrong on its X account Thursday. The manipulated White House version showed the civil rights attorney crying with her hands behind her back, captioned in all caps: "Arrested far-left agitator Nekima Levy Armstrong for orchestrating church riots in Minnesota." A separate photo posted by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's account showed the same image with Levy Armstrong wearing a neutral expression, highlighting inconsistencies in the official portrayal

1

.

Source: Seattle Times

Source: Seattle Times

Minnesota Activist Releases Video Evidence Contradicting Official Narrative

In response to the social media posts, Nekima Levy Armstrong released her own video of arrest Friday, filmed by her husband Marques Armstrong. The more than seven-minute footage shows several federal agents approaching to arrest her during an anti-immigration enforcement protest at a church where an Immigration and Customs Enforcement official also serves as pastor. "I'm asking you to please treat me with dignity and respect," she told the agents as they prepared to handcuff her. At no point in the video did Levy Armstrong appear to cry, directly contradicting the image created using AI that circulated on official government accounts

2

.

Federal Agents Promised Not to Share Recording on Social Media

The video reveals a telling exchange between Levy Armstrong and the arresting agents. When she noticed one agent holding up a phone to record, she asked, "Why are you recording? I would ask that you not record." The agent filming responded, "It's not going to be on Twitter. It's not going to be on anything like that. We don't want to create a false narrative." This assurance stands in stark contrast to what followed, as the Trump administration utilized AI to alter images from the arrest and share them publicly. Throughout the footage, Levy Armstrong remained composed, telling agents: "You know that this is a significant abuse of power. Because I refuse to be silent in the face of brutality from ICE"

1

.

Activist Claims Political Persecution Through AI Image Manipulation

In an audio message shared with The Associated Press, Levy Armstrong said the video exposes that the Trump administration had used AI to manipulate images of her arrest. "We are being politically persecuted for speaking out against authoritarianism, fascism and the tyranny of the Trump administration," she stated Friday morning during a call with her husband. The Minnesota activist was arrested with at least two others Thursday for their role in the anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement protest that disrupted a church service. She has since been released from jail, according to her attorney Jordan Kushner, who represented her in court Thursday

2

.

Implications for Government Use of Artificial Intelligence

This incident raises significant questions about how government agencies deploy AI technology to shape public perception of political dissent. The discrepancy between the manipulated image showing emotion and the actual video of arrest documenting a calm, measured interaction suggests deliberate image manipulation to portray the activist in a specific light. The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to requests for comment about the AI image manipulation allegations. As artificial intelligence tools become more accessible and sophisticated, the potential for misuse in political contexts grows, particularly when official government accounts amplify altered content. Observers should monitor whether guidelines emerge governing federal use of AI for public communications, and whether this case prompts broader scrutiny of how technology shapes the narrative around protest and civil disobedience in the current political climate

1

.

Today's Top Stories

TheOutpost.ai

Your Daily Dose of Curated AI News

Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.

© 2026 Triveous Technologies Private Limited
Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo