800 Artists Launch AI Campaign Against Copyright Infringement, Demanding Licensing Over Theft

13 Sources

Share

Around 800 artists, writers, actors, and musicians—including Scarlett Johansson, Cate Blanchett, and R.E.M.—have signed onto a new campaign called "Stealing Isn't Innovation" against what they describe as theft at a grand scale by AI companies. The Human Artistry Campaign-backed effort demands licensing deals and opt-out rights, accusing tech firms of copying massive amounts of creative content without authorization to train generative AI models.

800 Creatives Unite Against Unauthorized AI Training Data Use

Around 800 artists, writers, actors, and musicians have joined forces in a new AI campaign targeting what they call theft at a grand scale by technology companies. The "Stealing Isn't Innovation" initiative, launched Thursday, features prominent signatories including actors Scarlett Johansson and Cate Blanchett, the band R.E.M., authors George Saunders and Jodi Picoult, musicians Billy Corgan and The Roots, and Breaking Bad creator Vince Gilligan

1

4

. The campaign statement directly accuses tech firms of using American creators' work to build AI platforms without authorization or regard for copyright law, describing the practice as "not progress" but "theft - plain and simple"

3

.

Source: Engadget

Source: Engadget

Copyright Infringement Claims Target AI Training Data Practices

The Human Artistry Campaign, which organized this effort, brings together organizations including the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), Writers Guild of America, and SAG-AFTRA, the actors' union that went on strike in 2023 partly over AI concerns

4

. According to the campaign's press release, profit-hungry technology companies have copied massive amounts of creative content online without authorization or payment to those who created it

1

. This illegal intellectual property grab, they argue, fosters an information ecosystem dominated by misinformation and deepfakes, along with what they term AI slop—a vapid artificial avalanche of low-quality materials that risks model collapse and threatens America's AI superiority

1

5

.

Source: GameReactor

Source: GameReactor

Demanding Licensing Deals and Partnerships Instead of Unauthorized Use

Rather than calling for a complete halt to using their work, the signatories advocate for what they describe as "a better way" through licensing deals and partnerships

3

. The campaign specifically calls for licensing agreements, a healthy enforcement environment, and the right for artists to opt out of having their work used to train generative AI models

1

. The statement acknowledges firms that have pursued this ethical AI route, with OpenAI having signed deals with content owners including Disney and the Guardian, while Warner Music Group struck a licensing deal with AI music generator Suno. Major record labels have also partnered with AI music startups to provide their catalogues for AI remixing and model training

1

.

Personal Stakes: Scarlett Johansson's OpenAI Voice Controversy

Scarlett Johansson has particular reason to join this fight. The actor was pulled into the AI debate in 2024 after OpenAI's voice assistant used her vocal likeness without permission, prompting her to say she was "shocked, angered and in disbelief" by the move

4

. OpenAI subsequently removed the voice from ChatGPT

2

. More recently, concerns have intensified with reports that Elon Musk's Grok has been accused of creating millions of sexualized images of real people in just days

2

.

Source: TechRadar

Source: TechRadar

The Fair Use Defense and Growing Legal Battles

OpenAI once argued that it's "impossible" to train generative AI without copyrighted materials, since "copyright today covers virtually every sort of human expression"

2

. AI companies maintain they're protected by fair use, a US legal doctrine allowing use of copyright-protected work without permission in certain circumstances

4

. However, actors, musicians and authors take issue with this interpretation, particularly when they see their likenesses or work repurposed without artist compensation

2

. As of last year, dozens of lawsuits had been launched in the US over AI and copyright issues

4

.

What This Means for AI Development and Creative Industries

The campaign messages will appear in full-page ads in news outlets and on social media, aiming to shift public perception and policy around AI training data practices

1

5

. For those watching AI development, this represents a critical juncture. While tech companies and rights owners were once on opposing sides, they're increasingly cutting licensing deals that both parties can accept

1

. Digital publishers have backed a licensing standard that outlets can use to block their content from surfacing in AI search results

1

. In the UK, the government faces criticism for proposing that AI firms should be allowed to use copyright-protected work without first seeking permission unless artists opt out, with a review due in March

4

. The outcome of this campaign could determine whether unauthorized use of creative content continues or whether licensing agreements become the industry standard, fundamentally shaping how we train generative AI models going forward.

Today's Top Stories

TheOutpost.ai

Your Daily Dose of Curated AI News

Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.

© 2026 Triveous Technologies Private Limited
Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo