California Attorney General Declines to Join Elon Musk's Lawsuit Against OpenAI

4 Sources

Share

The California attorney general's office has refused to join Elon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI, citing a lack of public interest benefit. This decision comes amidst OpenAI's proposed transition from a nonprofit to a for-profit structure, sparking debates about AI development and corporate governance.

News article

California AG Rejects Musk's Request to Join OpenAI Lawsuit

The California attorney general's office has declined to join Elon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI, stating that the action does not serve the public interest of the state

1

2

3

4

. This decision, revealed in a letter made public on Tuesday, marks a significant development in the ongoing feud between Musk and OpenAI's current leadership.

Background of the Dispute

Elon Musk, a co-founder of OpenAI, is currently embroiled in a conflict with Sam Altman, the company's CEO, over the future direction of the AI firm

1

2

3

4

. The dispute centers around OpenAI's proposed transition from a nonprofit structure to a for-profit model, which Musk argues would compromise the organization's original mission.

OpenAI's Proposed Transition

OpenAI is seeking to remove its nonprofit board as the controlling power in exchange for a valuable equity stake

1

2

3

4

. The company argues that this transition is necessary to raise funds from investors and secure a $40 billion fundraising round by the end of the year

1

3

. OpenAI contends that the nonprofit will retain a stake that will grow in value, providing resources to carry out its mission

1

2

3

4

.

Musk's Lawsuit and Bid for Control

Musk filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Altman last year, accusing them of deviating from the founding mission of developing AI for the benefit of humanity rather than corporate profit

1

2

3

4

. In February, a Musk-led consortium made an unsolicited $97 billion bid for control of OpenAI

1

2

3

4

.

California AG's Decision

In the letter dated Monday, the attorney general stated that Musk had not adequately demonstrated how joining the lawsuit would benefit the public

1

2

3

4

. The office also suggested that Musk appeared to want to use OpenAI's charitable assets for his own purposes

1

2

3

4

.

Wider Implications and Opposition

The California attorney general's office would need to approve OpenAI's proposed nonprofit transition due to the company's California base

1

2

3

4

. Other entities, including Meta and a group of philanthropic leaders, have urged the attorney general to block OpenAI's transition

1

2

3

4

.

Future Developments

The dispute between Musk and OpenAI is set to continue, with a jury trial scheduled for spring next year

1

2

3

4

. Meanwhile, Musk has established his own AI firm, xAI, in 2023, leading Altman to allege that Musk is attempting to impede a competitor

1

2

3

4

.

This ongoing conflict highlights the complex interplay between AI development, corporate governance, and public interest in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence.

TheOutpost.ai

Your Daily Dose of Curated AI News

Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.

© 2025 Triveous Technologies Private Limited
Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo