The Outpost is a comprehensive collection of curated artificial intelligence software tools that cater to the needs of small business owners, bloggers, artists, musicians, entrepreneurs, marketers, writers, and researchers.
© 2024 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved
Curated by THEOUTPOST
On July 19, 2024
3 Sources
[1]
Dark Horse Comics Says It Won't Accept AI Art and Supports 'Human Creative Professionals' - IGN
Dark Horse Comics says it "does not support the use of AI-generated material" in the works it publishes. Artificial Intelligence and its ever-increasing presence in creative fields continues to be a minefield for entertainment companies to address. Dark Horse Comics has issued a statement that, in no uncertain terms, rejects the use of AI-generated content in its works. In a pinned post on X/Twitter, which was prefaced as a "frequently-asked question," the graphic novel and manga publisher reaffirmed its stance against AI-generated material. "Dark Horse Comics was originally founded to establish an ideal publishing atmosphere for creative professionals, and maintains this focus on supporting independent creators to this day. As such, Dark Horse does not support the use of AI-generated material in the works that we publish," Dark Horse Comics wrote in a statement. Toward the latter half of its statement, Dark Horse Comics said its contracts with the creators it works with -- be they for comic books, graphic novels, or manga -- prohibits them from using artificial intelligence in their works. "Our contracts include language stating that the creator agrees that the work will not consist of any material generated by computer Artificial intelligence programs. Dark Horse is committed to supporting human creative professionals with our business." Dark Horse Comics' perspective against the use of AI was met largely wit praise with from followers and comic book creators alike. Key among them was Avatar The Last Airbender: Team Avatar comic writer David Scheidt who wrote, "Proud to be a Dark Horse Comics writer," in a quote retweet. Others took an opportunity to screenshot Dark Horse Comic's post on the off chance the American comic book distributor goes back on its word. Isaiah Colbert is a freelance writer for IGN. You can follow them on Twitter @ShinEyeZehUhh.
[2]
Dark Horse Comics Says It Won't Accept AI Art and Supports 'Human Creative Professionals'
Dark Horse Comics says it "does not support the use of AI-generated material" in the works it publishes. Artificial Intelligence and its ever-increasing presence in creative fields continues to be a minefield for entertainment companies to address. Dark Horse Comics has issued a statement that, in no uncertain terms, rejects the use of AI-generated content in its works. In a pinned post on X/Twitter, which was prefaced as a "frequently-asked question," the graphic novel and manga publisher reaffirmed its stance against AI-generated material. "Dark Horse Comics was originally founded to establish an ideal publishing atmosphere for creative professionals, and maintains this focus on supporting independent creators to this day. As such, Dark Horse does not support the use of AI-generated material in the works that we publish," Dark Horse Comics wrote in a statement. Toward the latter half of its statement, Dark Horse Comics said its contracts with the creators it works with -- be they for comic books, graphic novels, or manga -- prohibits them from using artificial intelligence in their works. "Our contracts include language stating that the creator agrees that the work will not consist of any material generated by computer Artificial intelligence programs. Dark Horse is committed to supporting human creative professionals with our business." Dark Horse Comics' perspective against the use of AI was met largely wit praise with from followers and comic book creators alike. Key among them was Avatar The Last Airbender: Team Avatar comic writer David Scheidt who wrote, "Proud to be a Dark Horse Comics writer," in a quote retweet. Others took an opportunity to screenshot Dark Horse Comic's post on the off chance the American comic book distributor goes back on its word. Isaiah Colbert is a freelance writer for IGN. You can follow them on Twitter @ShinEyeZehUhh.
[3]
Comics giant Dark Horse says it won't use AI art or writing, is instead 'committed to supporting human creative professionals'
Publisher Dark Horse Comics has stated on X , "The Everything App," that it will not accept AI-generated content from comic book authors, an unequivocal rejection of the increasingly popular technology that contrasts with other companies' more "wait and see" approaches. Dark Horse said its statement was in response to "what is becoming a frequently-asked question," and explained that its primary concern was how generative AI impacts artists. "Dark Horse Comics was originally founded to establish an ideal publishing atmosphere for creative professionals, and maintains this focus on supporting independent creatives to this day," the statement reads. "As such, Dark Horse does not support the use of AI-generated material in the works that we publish. Our contracts include language stating that the creator agrees that the work will not consist of any material generated by computer Artificial Intelligence programs. Dark Horse is committed to supporting human creative professionals with our business." In addition to any ideological commitment to helping independent artists, this position makes sense for Dark Horse strategically as well. Though by no means an alt or small operation, having published Hellboy as well as comics based off The Witcher, Dragon Age, and Mass Effect, Dark Horse does have a more niche and plugged-in audience than DC or Marvel. It's easy to imagine the controversial use of AI tools dogging the company. See also how Wizards of the Coast accepted AI-generated art from a freelancer for a Dungeons and Dragons sourcebook, and later used AI art in a Magic the Gathering promotion -- both news cycles drew a lot of flak for the publisher. Dark Horse's statement also rhymes with similar news that came out of Nintendo recently: company president Shuntaro Furukawa indicated on an investor call that the company would not be pursuing generative AI tech for its games. Furukawa cited creative and copyright concerns as being behind the move, which makes a lot of sense given Nintendo's infamous defense of its own intellectual property.
Share
Share
Copy Link
Dark Horse Comics, a major player in the comic book industry, has announced its decision to reject AI-generated art and writing. The company emphasizes its commitment to supporting human creative professionals in the face of growing AI technology.
Dark Horse Comics, one of the largest comic book publishers in the United States, has taken a firm stance against the use of artificial intelligence in creating comic book art and writing. The company recently announced that it would not accept AI-generated content, emphasizing its commitment to supporting human creative professionals 1.
In a statement released on social media platforms, Dark Horse Comics declared, "Dark Horse does not accept AI-generated art or writing and is committed to supporting human creative professionals" 2. This clear and concise message leaves no room for ambiguity regarding the company's position on AI-generated content in the comic book industry.
The announcement has garnered significant attention within the comic book community and beyond. Many creators and fans have expressed support for Dark Horse's decision, viewing it as a positive step towards preserving the integrity of human creativity in the face of advancing AI technology 3.
Dark Horse's stance comes at a time when AI-generated art and writing are becoming increasingly sophisticated and prevalent across various creative industries. The decision raises important questions about the role of AI in artistic creation and the potential impact on human artists and writers.
As a major player in the comic book publishing world, Dark Horse's decision could potentially influence other publishers and set a precedent for the industry. It highlights the ongoing debate about the ethical use of AI in creative fields and the importance of protecting human artists' livelihoods.
Dark Horse's commitment to human creative professionals underscores the unique value that human artists and writers bring to the comic book medium. It suggests that, despite technological advancements, there remains a strong appreciation for the human touch in storytelling and visual art within the industry.
While the decision to reject AI-generated content may present challenges in terms of keeping up with technological trends, it also opens up opportunities for Dark Horse to focus on nurturing and promoting human talent. This approach could potentially lead to more diverse and authentic storytelling in their comic books.
Reference
[1]
[2]
Procreate, the popular digital illustration app, has firmly rejected the integration of generative AI tools. CEO James Cuda's stance has sparked discussions about AI's role in creative industries.
4 Sources
Procreate, a popular digital art app, has publicly rejected the integration of generative AI. The company's CEO, James Cuda, expressed strong opposition to AI-generated art, sparking debate in the digital art community.
6 Sources
Hasbro CEO Chris Cocks proposes incorporating AI into Dungeons & Dragons, citing personal experiences and market trends. The suggestion has ignited discussions about the future of tabletop gaming and the role of AI in creative storytelling.
4 Sources
Amazon Games CEO Christoph Hartmann discusses the role of AI in game development and its impact on actors, claiming it won't replace creative jobs but may automate mundane tasks.
2 Sources
A new AI-generated video featuring Tom Cruise has ignited a fierce debate about copyright and intellectual property in Hollywood, raising questions about the future of filmmaking and actor rights.
2 Sources