David Lammy pushes AI in justice system to cut court delays despite hallucination concerns

2 Sources

Share

UK Justice Secretary David Lammy announced plans to expand AI use across courts and tribunals, building on trials that saved 25,000 hours in the probation system. The move comes despite recent AI hallucination incidents and warnings from legal experts that the technology cannot replace proper investment in court infrastructure and staff.

David Lammy announces expanded use of AI in courts

Justice Secretary David Lammy confirmed plans to significantly expand the use of AI in courts across England and Wales, speaking at a Microsoft AI event in London. The deputy prime minister revealed that members of the judiciary have already been using AI tools, and he now wants "to see more AI" integrated into the justice system

1

. As part of this digital modernization efforts, the government will increase investment in its justice AI project, which has already demonstrated measurable results in reducing administrative burdens.

Source: Sky News

Source: Sky News

The Ministry of Justice reported that AI trials in the probation system have saved 25,000 hours by helping transcribe more than 150,000 meetings between offenders and officers

1

. Building on this success, the government is now testing transcription technology in courts and tribunals. In the immigration and asylum chamber, some judges are already using AI to help formulate notes and write remarks, while pilots are underway for legal advisers and district judges in magistrates' courts to speed up case management by transcribing material and summarizing their judgments.

Microsoft partnership drives agentic AI adoption

Darren Hardman, chief executive of Microsoft in the UK, described the Ministry of Justice as "one of the fastest-growing adopters of agentic AI"

1

. Agentic AI represents a new generation of technology that can take instructions in normal English and then use a computer to carry out tasks like creating documents or interfacing with other software. This partnership between Microsoft and the government aims to tackle court backlogs that have left victims facing unacceptable delays. The judiciary has agreed to a £2.785 billion settlement for courts and tribunals for 2026/27, up from £2.538 billion last year, with an additional £287 million invested in fixing the crumbling court estate

2

.

AI hallucination concerns shadow expansion plans

The push for increased use of AI in courts comes despite recent controversies involving AI errors. Sky News uncovered that at least 21 police forces have continued using Microsoft Copilot despite an AI hallucination contributing to the banning of Maccabi Tel Aviv fans from a game against Aston Villa—something Lammy previously criticized

1

. The error involved a non-existent game between Tel Aviv and West Ham being referenced in a police report, demonstrating how AI can generate false information that influences real-world decisions

2

.

Legal experts warn against over-reliance on technology

The Law Society of England & Wales expressed reservations about AI in the justice system, with Vice President Brett Dixon stating that while they support modernizing the justice system, "AI is not a silver bullet"

2

. Richard Atkinson, a defense barrister and former head of the Law Society, emphasized that "where liberty and reputation are at stake, the government must take particular care to safeguard people's rights and ensure fair processes"

1

. Legal professionals stress that AI might ease administrative pressures but cannot replace much-needed investment in court staff and infrastructure, with all decisions having serious consequences requiring human involvement to prevent miscarriages of justice.

Reducing jury trials alongside AI expansion

Lammy reiterated his controversial commitment to reducing jury trials in England and Wales as part of efforts to address the courts backlog. He noted that currently only 3% of criminal cases go before a jury, with the vast majority already heard by magistrates without juries

1

. Following the proposed changes, around three-quarters of trials in the crown court will still be heard by a jury. These proposals, based on recommendations from retired Court of Appeal judge Brian Leveson, have faced opposition from Labour backbenchers and legal groups

2

. Leveson has suggested courts could rely on AI to summarize witness statements when taking case management decisions, further integrating technology into judicial processes.

Today's Top Stories

TheOutpost.ai

Your Daily Dose of Curated AI News

Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.

© 2026 Triveous Technologies Private Limited
Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo