DOGE's AI Tool Aims to Slash 50% of Federal Regulations, Sparking Controversy

DOGE has built an AI tool to slash federal regulations | TechCrunch

The Department of Government Efficiency hopes to use a new AI tool to eliminate half of the federal government's regulatory mandates, according to The Washington Post. Citing a PowerPoint presentation dated July 1, The Post reports that the DOGE AI Deregulation Decision Tool is supposed to analyze around 200,000 federal regulations and identify the ones that are no longer required by law, with the goal of eliminating half those regulations by the first anniversary of President Donald Trump's return to office. It seems this work is already underway, with the presentation declaring the tool has already been used to review regulations at the Department of Housing and Urban Development and to write "100% of deregulations" Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. A White House spokesperson told The Post that "no single plan has been approved or greenlit" but praised the DOGE team as "the best and brightest in the business."

DOGE is reportedly pushing an AI tool that would put half of all federal regulations on a 'delete list'

According to a report from The Washington Post, DOGE is using an AI tool to analyze federal regulations and determine which to get rid of. A DOGE PowerPoint presentation obtained by the publication notes that its "AI Solution" -- reportedly called the DOGE AI Deregulation Decision Tool -- found that 100,000 out of over 200,000 regulations "can be deleted." The document sets a September 1 goal deadline for agencies to complete their own deregulation lists using the tool, which it says can be done in under four weeks, and then "DOGE will roll-up a delete list of 50% of all Federal Regulations (100k Regulatory Rules)." The tool is targeting regulations that are no longer required by law, The Washington Post reports. After it makes its suggestions, staffers would review the proposed deletions before finalizing a plan. According to the PowerPoint, the tool has already been tried out by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), where it's been used to write "100% of deregulations," and by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for decisions on 1,083 regulatory sections. The Washington Post spoke to three HUD employees who confirmed it was recently used. One also said that the tool got things wrong on several occasions, misreading the language of the law at times. DOGE will reportedly start training other agencies on the tool this month. Head over to The Washington Post to read the full report.

DOGE's AI tool misreads law, still tasked with deleting half of US regulations

A hot potato: Elon Musk may have long departed the Department of Government Efficiency, but DOGE is still causing controversy. A new report claims that the agency is using a new artificial intelligence tool to create a list of federal regulations that will be deleted. The goal is for 50% of regulations to be eliminated before the anniversary of President Trump's inauguration. The Doge AI Deregulation Decision Tool will be analyzing around 200,000 federal regulations, according to the Washington Post, which cites documents it obtained and four government officials. According to a PowerPoint presentation outlining the plans, around 100,000 of these rules would be deemed worthy of deletion. The tool has already been used to make decisions on 1,083 regulatory sections at the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in under two weeks. Three employees from the agency said it has been used recently to review hundreds, if not more than 1,000, lines of regulation. There are dangers that come with using AI for these sorts of tasks, of course. One HUD employee said that the tool made several errors, and it claimed those who had drafted various agency regulations misunderstood the law in several places. In reality, the AI had iteself misunderstood the complex language. The system has also been used by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to write "100% of deregulations." The presentation includes a timeline in which agencies have until September 1 to use the tool to create their own list of regulations for erasure. After which, "DOGE will roll-up a delete list of 50% of all Federal Regulations (100k Regulatory Rules)." One of Trump's campaign promises was an aggressive reduction in regulations, which he said were driving up the cost of goods. DOGE's presentation claims that complying with these rules costs $3.1 trillion per year, and that using the AI tool to slash 50% of all regulations will save $1.5 trillion annually, unlock $600 billion in investment, increase US sales revenue by $1.1 trillion, and cut the federal budget by $85 billion. When asked about the use of AI for the deregulation process, White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said "all options are being explored" to achieve Trump's promises. He added that the work was in the early stages and "no single plan has been approved or green-lit." DOGE has embraced AI since the agency's inception. It announced an "AI-first" strategy in February, started embedding the technology across multiple government brances in March, and rolled out its custom AI chatbot (often referred to as GSAi) to 1,500 GSA employees in March. DOGE has not only proved controversial over its actions - and the fact it had been led by Elon Musk - but also its tendency to hire very young employees. One of these was Edward "Big Balls" Coristine, who has what one could generously call a colorful history. Coristine left DOGE last month.

DOGE builds AI tool to cut 50 percent of federal regulations

People outside the Eisenhower Executive Office Building in Washington on July 15. (Eric Lee/For The Washington Post) The U.S. DOGE Service is using a new artificial intelligence tool to slash federal regulations, with the goal of eliminating half of Washington's regulatory mandates by the first anniversary of President Donald Trump's inauguration, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post and four government officials familiar with the plans. The tool, called the "DOGE AI Deregulation Decision Tool," is supposed to analyze roughly 200,000 federal regulations to determine which can be eliminated because they are no longer required by law, according to a PowerPoint presentation obtained by The Post that is dated July 1 and outlines DOGE's plans. Roughly 100,000 of those rules would be deemed worthy of trimming, the PowerPoint estimates -- mostly through the automated tool with some staff feedback. The PowerPoint also suggests the AI tool will save the United States trillions of dollars by reducing compliance requirements, slashing the federal budget and unlocking unspecified "external investment." The tool has already been used to eliminated more than 1,000 "regulatory sections" at the Department of Housing and Urban Development in under two weeks, according to the PowerPoint, and to write "100% of deregulations" at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Three HUD employees -- as well as documents obtained by The Post -- confirmed that an AI tool was recently used to review hundreds, if not more than 1,000, lines of regulations at that agency and suggest edits or deletions. The tool was developed by engineers brought into government as part of Elon Musk's DOGE project, according to two federal officials directly familiar with DOGE's work, who, like others interviewed for this story, spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal deliberations they were not authorized to discuss publicly. Skip to end of carousel Help us report on the Trump administration The Washington Post wants to hear from anyone with knowledge of the Trump administration's inner workings, including the activities of the U.S. DOGE Service. You can contact our reporters by email or Signal encrypted message. Hannah Natanson: [email protected] or (202) 580-5477 on Signal. Jeff Stein: [email protected] or (917) 887-2891 on Signal. Dan Diamond: [email protected] or dan_diamond.01 on Signal. Rachel Siegel: [email protected] or (214) 930-6901 on Signal. Read more about how to use Signal and other ways to securely contact The Post. End of carousel Conservatives have long argued that the federal government issues far too many regulations that constrain economic growth and hurt the private sector. Many liberals have emphasized that there are reasons federal regulations are in place, such as protecting the environment and ensuring food safety. Asked about the AI-fueled deregulation, White House spokesman Harrison Fields wrote in an email that "all options are being explored" to achieve the president's goal of deregulating government. Fields noted that "no single plan has been approved or green-lit," cautioning that the work is "in its early stages and is being conducted in a creative way in consultation with the White House." Fields added: "The DOGE experts creating these plans are the best and brightest in the business and are embarking on a never-before-attempted transformation of government systems and operations to enhance efficiency and effectiveness." One former member of DOGE, which stands for Department of Government Efficiency, wrote in a text message that the team did everything it could to come up with legal and technological solutions to repeal as many regulations as possible within Trump's term. "Creative deployment of artificial intelligence to advance the president's regulatory agenda is one logical strategy to make significant progress in that finite amount of time," wrote James Burnham, who served as chief attorney for DOGE and is now managing partner at King Street Legal. The proposed use of AI to accomplish swift, massive deregulation expands upon the Trump administration's work to embed AI across the government -- using it for everything from fighting wars to reviewing taxes. And it dovetails with the administration's aim to unwind regulations government-wide, even without AI. But it's unclear if a new, untested technology could make mistakes in its attempts to analyze federal regulations typically put in place for a reason. On Jan. 31, Trump issued an executive order to "unleash prosperity through deregulation," which required agencies to repeal 10 rules for every new rule issued. Since then, some departments have engaged in what almost appears to be a competition to cut. In May, the Transportation Department declared it had deleted 52 regulations and more than 73,000 words from the Federal Register. This month, the Labor Department announced plans to nix more than 60 regulations. Still, Republicans have grown frustrated by the relatively slow pace of deregulatory actions. During the first six months of Trump's first term, his administration cut costs by about $550 million and paperwork hours by 566,000, according to the American Action Forum, a center-right think tank that tracks regulations. Through July of this year, the Trump administration has achieved nearly all its cost reductions by repealing one rule regarding what businesses must report about their ownership ties. Without that, the Trump administration would have increased regulatory costs by $1.1 billion and paperwork hours by 3.3 million, according to the think tank. "They're way behind where they were in 2017 on the numbers, no question about it," said Doug Holtz-Eakin, president of the American Action Forum and former director of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. "I thought this was going to be something they crushed because they did so in 2017. I've been baffled by this." The AI tool is intended to massively accelerate the deregulation process, with every federal agency able to develop a list of regulations to eliminate in less than four weeks, according to the PowerPoint. The agencies are supposed to finish their lists by Sept. 1, and this month, DOGE is supposed to start training staff at agencies on how to use the AI tool, the PowerPoint states. Read the PowerPoint here. While DOGE had pushed earlier this year to take a larger role in the deregulatory effort, the Musk-led team was frequently rebuffed by agency employees who worried about outsourcing decisions and their authorities, according to three people who have participated in deregulatory conversations at the White House and the agency level who spoke on the condition of anonymity to share private conversations. Federal officials also questioned whether DOGE had the subject matter expertise to comb through highly technical regulations and find appropriate targets for cuts, the people said. As DOGE's influence waned following Musk's departure, the administration has remained focused on Trump's deregulatory order, the people said. White House staff are also using internal trackers to monitor how quickly agencies are paring regulations, while leaders at every major agency are meeting regularly to discuss how quickly they can meet Trump's ambitions and which cuts "count" toward the president's order, according to the people. In some cases, DOGE's campaign to fire federal workers and dramatically shrink the federal workforce has hampered the deregulatory effort, the three people said. "The White House wants us higher on the leader board," said one of the three people. "But you have to have staff and time to write the deregulatory notices, and we don't. That's a big reason for the holdup." Can DOGE delete rules? Trump officials have tried to use AI to roll back regulations before. At the Department of Health and Human Services, a 2020 "Regulatory Clean Up Initiative" drew on an AI tool to identify and remove archaic language, defunct federal provisions and outdated terms from federal rules. Trump has pushed the limits of the Administrative Procedure Act, which governs repealing federal regulations, most notably through an executive order ending a rule that restricted the water flow of showerheads. It is unclear if courts will allow the administration to void rules. Meanwhile, private-sector companies tend to be uncomfortable ignoring a rule that was illegally repealed, said Nicholas Bagley, an administrative law expert at the University of Michigan. "There's been some flashy sideshow efforts to avoid the legal strictures, but in general, they don't stick," Bagley said of Trump's unilateral efforts to cut regulations. DOGE officials may be concerned about the legality of the AI tool. One page of the slideshow says four people identified as "DOGE lawyers" -- Burnham, Austin Raynor, Jacob Altik and Ashley Boizelle -- each "vetted and endorsed" the AI deregulation tool. Raynor, Altik and Boizelle could not be reached for comment. Federal regulations, as they stand now, can be divided into three categories, the PowerPoint says: 50 percent are not required by law, 38 percent are statutorily mandated and 12 percent are "Not Required but Agency Needs." By ending the rules that are both unnecessary by law and to agency operations, the PowerPoint states, the government could recover $3.3 trillion a year. But the PowerPoint also suggests it would take 3.6 million "man-hours" to nix 100,000 regulations under the current system. It is not clear how the PowerPoint's authors arrived at these figures. That's where the AI tool comes in, the PowerPoint proposes. The tool will save 93 percent of the human labor involved by reviewing up to 500,000 comments submitted by the public in response to proposed rule changes. By the end of the deregulation exercise, humans will have spent a grand total of 36 hours gutting half of all federal regulations, the PowerPoint claims. A case study at HUD The PowerPoint lists two case studies as examples of how well its AI tool can work, detailing recent efforts to slash regulations at HUD and CFPB. Asked about the AI-driven regulation slashing, a HUD spokesperson wrote in a statement that the agency is having "ongoing discussions" to consider how to make government more efficient. "We are not disclosing specifics about how many regulations are being examined or where we are at in the broader process," the spokesperson said, adding, "the process is far from final." The spokesperson continued: "The intent of the developments is not to replace the judgement, discretion and expertise of staff but be additive to the process." CFPB did not respond to questions. The Post was not able to independently confirm the use of AI at the agency. At HUD, efforts to use AI to kill regulations began three months ago, according to three employees familiar with the matter and emails obtained by The Post. A message sent to some of the agency's Public and Indian Housing staff on April 18 announced a "DOGE team" would be "learning how AI will be able to analyze all PIH regulations looking for and flagging discrepancies between them and the underlying statute." "This is a major effort," the email continued. "We are working with the lawyers to simplify the [Administrative Procedure Act] process ... use AI for drafting, and use AI for complying notices in the future." The overall goal, the email noted, was to deploy AI to reduce the time staff had to spend on deregulation. Another document, signed "HUD DOGE Team" and sent to staff, detailed how DOGE team members wanted federal staffers to engage the AI tool. Staffers were supposed to look over the tool's recommendations for proposed regulatory eliminations and mark whether they agreed, disagreed or believed deletions should go further. One HUD employee who participated in this process said the AI tool made several errors. It delivered an analysis saying those who drafted various agency regulations had misunderstood the law in several places, said the employee, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to reveal internal conversations. But the AI tool was sometimes wrong, the employee said. "There were a couple places where the AI said the language was outside of the statute," the employee said, "and actually, no -- the AI read the language wrong, and it is actually correct." After its tryout at HUD, the AI deregulation tool is supposed to deploy across the rest of government in coming months, according to the DOGE PowerPoint. Over the next five months, agencies will work with the AI tool to identify regulations to kill, respond to public comments about the proposed deletions and submit formal deregulation proposals, the PowerPoint says. The goal is to wrap everything up and "Relaunch America on Jan. 20, 2026," the PowerPoint states.

Doge reportedly using AI tool to create 'delete list' of federal regulations

'Department of government efficiency' is proposing to use tool to cut 50% of federal regulations by January The "department of government efficiency" (Doge) is using artificial intelligence to create a "delete list" of federal regulations, according to a report, proposing to use the tool to cut 50% of regulations by the first anniversary of Donald Trump's second inauguration. The "Doge AI Deregulation Decision Tool" will analyze 200,000 government regulations, according to internal documents obtained by the Washington Post, and select those which it deems to be no longer required by law. Doge, which was run by Elon Musk until May, claims that 100,000 of those regulations can then be eliminated, following some staff feedback. A PowerPoint presentation made public by the Post claims that the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) used the AI tool to make "decisions on 1,083 regulatory sections", while the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau used it to write "100% of deregulations". The Post spoke to three HUD employees who told the newspaper AI had been "recently used to review hundreds, if not more than 1,000, lines of regulations". During his 2024 campaign, Donald Trump claimed that government regulations were "driving up the cost of goods" and promised the "most aggressive regulatory reduction" in history. He repeatedly criticized rules which aimed to tackle the climate crisis, and as president he ordered the heads of all government agencies to undertake a review of all regulations in coordination with Doge. Asked about the use of AI in deregulation by the Post, White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said "all options are being explored" to achieve the president's deregulation promises. Fields said that "no single plan has been approved or green-lit", and the work is "in its early stages and is being conducted in a creative way in consultation with the White House". Fields added: "The Doge experts creating these plans are the best and brightest in the business and are embarking on a never-before-attempted transformation of government systems and operations to enhance efficiency and effectiveness." Musk appointed a slew of inexperienced staffers to Doge, including Edward Coristine, a 19-year-old who was previously known by the online handle "Big Balls". Earlier this year, Reuters reported that Coristine was one of two Doge associates promoting the use of AI across the federal bureaucracy.

DOGE has an AI tool to help decide which federal regulations to 'delete'

Just because Tesla and X CEO Elon Musk has taken a step back from the spotlight doesn't mean DOGE -- the so-called "Department of Government Efficiency" -- has stopped pushing its controversial tech agenda inside the federal government. According to a report from The Washington Post, DOGE is now deploying an AI tool to help federal agencies identify and eliminate regulations en masse. Internal PowerPoint slides obtained by the Post detail what's being called the "DOGE AI Deregulation Decision Tool," which claims to have flagged 100,000 of 200,000 federal rules as ripe for deletion. DOGE's goal is to build a "delete list," cutting half of all federal regulations by September 1. It's designed to target rules no longer required by law and is reportedly being rolled out across multiple agencies -- including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), where it has allegedly written "100% of deregulations," and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), where it's been used to review over 1,000 regulatory sections. But accuracy is already an issue. Several HUD employees told the Post that the AI frequently misunderstands legal language and misidentifies rules, raising concerns about the tool's reliability in policy decisions. The Deregulation Decision Tool is just one of many AI-driven projects DOGE has introduced under the Trump administration. Other initiatives include an AI-first overhaul of the U.S. General Services Administration, automated monitoring of EPA communications for DEI or anti-Trump/Musk content, and using AI to write code for the Department of Veterans Affairs -- a project reportedly riddled with bugs and errors.

DOGE builds AI tool to cut 50% of federal regulations

The U.S. DOGE Service is using a new artificial intelligence tool to slash federal regulations, with the goal of eliminating half of Washington, D.C.'s regulatory mandates by the first anniversary of President Donald Trump's inauguration, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post and four government officials familiar with the plans. The tool, called the "DOGE AI Deregulation Decision Tool," is supposed to analyze roughly 200,000 federal regulations to determine which can be eliminated because they are no longer required by law, according to a PowerPoint presentation obtained by The Post that is dated July 1 and outlines DOGE's plans. Roughly 100,000 of those rules would be deemed worthy of trimming, the PowerPoint estimates -- mostly through the automated tool with some staff feedback. The PowerPoint also suggests the AI tool will save the United States trillions of dollars by reducing compliance requirements, slashing the federal budget and unlocking unspecified "external investment." The tool has already been used to complete "decisions on 1,083 regulatory sections" at the Department of Housing and Urban Development in under two weeks, according to the PowerPoint, and to write "100% of deregulations" at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Three HUD employees -- as well as documents obtained by The Post -- confirmed that an AI tool was recently used to review hundreds, if not more than 1,000, lines of regulations at that agency and suggest edits or deletions. The tool was developed by engineers brought into government as part of Elon Musk's DOGE project, according to two federal officials directly familiar with DOGE's work, who, like others interviewed for this story, spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal deliberations they were not authorized to discuss publicly. Conservatives have long argued that the federal government issues far too many regulations that constrain economic growth and hurt the private sector. Many liberals have emphasized that there are reasons federal regulations are in place, such as protecting the environment and ensuring food safety. Asked about the AI-fueled deregulation, White House spokesman Harrison Fields wrote in an email that "all options are being explored" to achieve the president's goal of deregulating government. Fields noted that "no single plan has been approved or green-lit," cautioning that the work is "in its early stages and is being conducted in a creative way in consultation with the White House." Fields added: "The DOGE experts creating these plans are the best and brightest in the business and are embarking on a never-before-attempted transformation of government systems and operations to enhance efficiency and effectiveness." No decisions have been completed on using AI to slash regulations, a HUD spokesperson said. The agency is having "ongoing discussions" to consider how to make government more efficient. "We are not disclosing specifics about how many regulations are being examined or where we are at in the broader process," the spokesperson said, adding, "the process is far from final." The spokesperson continued: "The intent of the developments is not to replace the judgment, discretion and expertise of staff but be additive to the process." One former member of DOGE, which stands for Department of Government Efficiency, wrote in a text message that the team did everything it could to come up with legal and technological solutions to repeal as many regulations as possible within Trump's term. "Creative deployment of artificial intelligence to advance the president's regulatory agenda is one logical strategy to make significant progress in that finite amount of time," wrote James Burnham, who served as chief attorney for DOGE and is now managing partner at King Street Legal. The proposed use of AI to accomplish swift, massive deregulation expands upon the Trump administration's work to embed AI across the government -- using it for everything from fighting wars to reviewing taxes. And it dovetails with the administration's aim to unwind regulations governmentwide, even without AI. But it's unclear whether a new, untested technology could make mistakes in its attempts to analyze federal regulations typically put in place for a reason. On Jan. 31, Trump issued an executive order to "unleash prosperity through deregulation," which required agencies to repeal 10 rules for every new rule issued. Since then, some departments have engaged in what almost appears to be a competition to cut. In May, the Transportation Department declared it had deleted 52 regulations and more than 73,000 words from the Federal Register. This month, the Labor Department announced plans to nix more than 60 regulations. Still, Republicans have grown frustrated by the relatively slow pace of deregulatory actions. During the first six months of Trump's first term, his administration cut costs by about $550 million and paperwork hours by 566,000, according to the American Action Forum, a center-right think tank that tracks regulations. Through July of this year, the Trump administration has achieved nearly all its cost reductions by repealing one rule regarding what businesses must report about their ownership ties. Without that, the Trump administration would have increased regulatory costs by $1.1 billion and paperwork hours by 3.3 million, according to the think tank. "They're way behind where they were in 2017 on the numbers, no question about it," said Doug Holtz-Eakin, president of the American Action Forum and former director of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. "I thought this was going to be something they crushed because they did so in 2017. I've been baffled by this." The AI tool is intended to massively accelerate the deregulation process, with every federal agency able to develop a list of regulations to eliminate in less than four weeks, according to the PowerPoint. The agencies are supposed to finish their lists by Sept. 1, and this month, DOGE is supposed to start training staff at agencies on how to use the AI tool, the PowerPoint states. While DOGE had pushed earlier this year to take a larger role in the deregulatory effort, the Musk-led team was frequently rebuffed by agency employees who worried about outsourcing decisions and their authorities, according to three people who have participated in deregulatory conversations at the White House and the agency level who spoke on the condition of anonymity to share private conversations. Federal officials also questioned whether DOGE had the subject matter expertise to comb through highly technical regulations and find appropriate targets for cuts, the people said. As DOGE's influence waned following Musk's departure, the administration has remained focused on Trump's deregulatory order, the people said. White House staff are also using internal trackers to monitor how quickly agencies are paring regulations, while leaders at every major agency are meeting regularly to discuss how quickly they can meet Trump's ambitions and which cuts "count" toward the president's order, according to the people. In some cases, DOGE's campaign to fire federal workers and dramatically shrink the federal workforce has hampered the deregulatory effort, the three people said. "The White House wants us higher on the leader board," said one of the three people. "But you have to have staff and time to write the deregulatory notices, and we don't. That's a big reason for the holdup." Can DOGE delete rules? Trump officials have tried to use AI to roll back regulations before. At the Department of Health and Human Services, a 2020 "Regulatory Clean Up Initiative" drew on an AI tool to identify and remove archaic language, defunct federal provisions and outdated terms from federal rules. Trump has pushed the limits of the Administrative Procedure Act, which governs repealing federal regulations, most notably through an executive order ending a rule that restricted the water flow of shower heads. It is unclear if courts will allow the administration to void rules. Meanwhile, private-sector companies tend to be uncomfortable ignoring a rule that was illegally repealed, said Nicholas Bagley, an administrative law expert at the University of Michigan. "There's been some flashy sideshow efforts to avoid the legal strictures, but in general, they don't stick," Bagley said of Trump's unilateral efforts to cut regulations. DOGE officials may be concerned about the legality of the AI tool. One page of the slideshow says four people identified as "DOGE lawyers" -- Burnham, Austin Raynor, Jacob Altik and Ashley Boizelle -- each "vetted and endorsed" the AI deregulation tool. Raynor, Altik and Boizelle could not be reached for comment. Federal regulations, as they stand now, can be divided into three categories, the PowerPoint says: 50% are not required by law, 38% are statutorily mandated and 12% are "Not Required but Agency Needs." By ending the rules that are both unnecessary by law and to agency operations, the PowerPoint states, the government could recover $3.3 trillion a year. But the PowerPoint also suggests it would take 3.6 million "man-hours" to nix 100,000 regulations under the current system. It is not clear how the PowerPoint's authors arrived at these figures. That's where the AI tool comes in, the PowerPoint proposes. The tool will save 93% of the human labor involved by reviewing up to 500,000 comments submitted by the public in response to proposed rule changes. By the end of the deregulation exercise, humans will have spent just a few hours to cancel each of the 100,000 regulations, the PowerPoint claims. A case study at HUD The PowerPoint lists two case studies as examples of how well its AI tool can work, detailing recent efforts to slash regulations at HUD and CFPB. CFPB did not respond to questions. The Post was not able to independently confirm the use of AI at the agency. At HUD, efforts to use AI to kill regulations began three months ago, according to three employees familiar with the matter and emails obtained by The Post. A message sent to some of the agency's Public and Indian Housing staff on April 18 announced a "DOGE team" would be "learning how AI will be able to analyze all PIH regulations looking for and flagging discrepancies between them and the underlying statute." "This is a major effort," the email continued. "We are working with the lawyers to simplify the [Administrative Procedure Act] process ... use AI for drafting, and use AI for complying notices in the future." The overall goal, the email noted, was to deploy AI to reduce the time staff had to spend on deregulation. Another document, signed "HUD DOGE Team" and sent to staff, detailed how DOGE team members wanted federal staffers to engage the AI tool. Staffers were supposed to look over the tool's recommendations for proposed regulatory eliminations and mark whether they agreed, disagreed or believed deletions should go further. One HUD employee who participated in this process said the AI tool made several errors. It delivered an analysis saying those who drafted various agency regulations had misunderstood the law in several places, said the employee, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to reveal internal conversations. But the AI tool was sometimes wrong, the employee said. "There were a couple places where the AI said the language was outside of the statute," the employee said, "and actually, no -- the AI read the language wrong, and it is actually correct." After its tryout at HUD, the AI deregulation tool is supposed to deploy across the rest of government in coming months, according to the DOGE PowerPoint. Over the next five months, agencies will work with the AI tool to identify regulations to kill, respond to public comments about the proposed deletions and submit formal deregulation proposals, the PowerPoint says. The goal is to wrap everything up and "Relaunch America on Jan. 20, 2026," the PowerPoint states. Lauren Kaori Gurley and Ian Duncan contributed to this report.

DOGE Develops Custom AI Model for Regulatory 'Delete' List | PYMNTS.com

That's according to a report Saturday (July 26) by the Washington Post, citing government documents and interviews with four officials familiar with the plans. The goal is to cut the number of regulations by half in time for the first anniversary of President Donald Trump's inauguration. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is employing an AI tool called the "DOGE AI Deregulation Decision Tool." That tool is designed to analyze around 200,000 federal regulations to determine which can be eliminated because they are no longer required by law, the report said, citing a PowerPoint presentation outlining DOGE's plans. Some 100,000 of those rules would be worth cutting, the PowerPoint estimates, primarily via the automated tool with some staff feedback. The document also suggests the tool will save the U.S. trillions by lowering compliance requirements, cutting the federal budget and identifying unspecified "external investment." According to the report, the tool has already been used to make "decisions on 1,083 regulatory sections" at the Department of Housing and Urban Development in under two weeks, and write "100% of deregulations" at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The Post noted that the use of AI to achieve sweeping regulation is in line with the Trump administration's effort to weave AI into the entire government. Last week, the White House introduced a policy roadmap detailing Trump's plans to maintain U.S. leadership in the global AI race. The plan stresses deregulation, infrastructure development, stricter export controls and freedom of speech for chatbots. Among the rule's stipulations, the "America's AI Action Plan" requires that AI systems are built from the ground up with "freedom of speech" and conform to American values instead of being shaped by "ideological bias."