Esquire Singapore publishes AI interview with One Piece actor Mackenyu, sparking ethics debate

2 Sources

Share

Esquire Singapore published an AI-generated interview with One Piece actor Mackenyu after he couldn't attend in person. The magazine fed his previous interviews through Claude and Copilot to create fabricated responses, drawing widespread criticism from journalists and fans who question the ethics of publishing AI-generated content as journalism.

Esquire Singapore Creates Fake AI Interview Using Claude and Copilot

Esquire Singapore published what it called "an unprecedented interview" with Mackenyu, the One Piece actor who portrays Roronoa Zoro in Netflix's live-action adaptation

1

. The AI interview appeared in a March feature titled "Mackenyu in Resonance," but the piece wasn't an actual conversation with the 29-year-old Japanese-American actor. Instead, writer Joy Ling acknowledged that when Mackenyu's schedule prevented face time, the magazine took a different approach

2

.

Source: PC Gamer

Source: PC Gamer

"We had the photospread, but nothing directly uttered by the 29-year-old," the story explained. "With a driving need for a feature, we had to be inventive. Harnessing our creative license, we pulled his [responses] verbatim from previous interviews and fed them through an AI programme to formulate new responses"

1

. The AI-generated interview was produced with Claude, Copilot, and edited by humans, according to Esquire Singapore's disclosure.

The Bizarre Content Generated by AI Tools

The fabricated interview asked Mackenyu about becoming a father, dealing with "disillusionment" in general terms, and even touched on memories of his late father, legendary action star Sonny Chiba

1

. The AI responded with what readers described as "unsubstantial meandering," throwing out non-committal answers and referencing things with absolutely zero context

2

. At one point, the AI even typed "(laughs)" to simulate natural conversation.

Kotaku reported that the magazine asked "a breadth of vague and ridiculous questions," including how AI Mackenyu deals with "pressure and expectations" and feelings of "disillusionment." The section where the AI discussed living up to his deceased father and wanting "to make him proud" drew particular criticism for being "incredibly fucked up"

2

.

Widespread Criticism From Journalists and Fans

The unethical application of AI in journalism triggered immediate backlash when the article resurfaced in recent days, despite being published in early March. New York Times-published journalist Nicole Clark expressed anger on Bluesky, questioning the appropriateness of the piece. "In what world is any of this appropriate or justifiable? And even with 'disclaimers' everything else about the piece looks like a typical interview. It's the equivalent of using ad space to publish misinformation"

1

.

The negative reception from fans was equally sharp. One Mackenyu fanpage on X wrote: "I'm disappointed Esquire SG wrote an entire AI interview to replace Macken's response. I doubt they did this with his consent. Was it impossible to publish the [photo] shoot without his interview?! Please keep in mind these answers are not his"

2

. Bluesky users compared it unfavorably to fan fiction, with one noting that "Fan ficcers write their own stuff and if they don't they're hunted for sport"

1

.

Questions of Consent and Journalism Ethics

Kotaku reached out to Mackenyu's talent agency to determine whether the actor gave consent for this controversial use of AI. The magazine itself noted that Mackenyu never replied to their "e-mail correspondence," suggesting the actor likely didn't sign off on the endeavor

2

. Neither Mackenyu nor his talent agency promoted the piece, which only reached his fanbase days after publication.

This incident reflects broader concerns about journalism ethics in the age of AI clones and synthetic content. Similar to AI clones of real journalists recently used by companies like Grammarly, the Esquire Singapore piece raises questions about what constitutes acceptable use of AI in media

1

. The controversy highlights the need for clear boundaries around AI-generated content, particularly when it involves putting words into real people's mouths without their explicit permission. As AI tools become more sophisticated, media organizations face mounting pressure to establish ethical guidelines that protect both subjects and readers from misinformation dressed up as legitimate journalism.

Today's Top Stories

TheOutpost.ai

Your Daily Dose of Curated AI News

Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.

© 2026 Triveous Technologies Private Limited
Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo