2 Sources
2 Sources
[1]
OpenAI Reveals Why Human Reviews are Holding Back AI Productivity Growth
This issue highlights the growing limits of AI interaction. In the past, experts focused on computing power and model size. Today, those areas move fast. Human involvement now creates the biggest delay. According to Embiricos, this problem affects many industries using AI tools. He believes the next phase of growth needs a major shift. must work reliably on their own. They should require less checking and fewer corrections. When systems become dependable by default, productivity can rise sharply. Embriicos described this growth as gradual at first, then sudden. Early users of better automation may see clear gains soon. Larger companies may follow as trust in AI systems increases. This change could drive strong across sectors. However, he also warned against simple solutions. Every use case differs. Fully autonomous AI systems need careful design. Some tasks require more control. Others allow more freedom. The path to AGI will involve many steps, not one breakthrough. Moreover, this change affects the future of work. By the time AI automation reaches its peak, the human roles might have changed. The workers might be engaged only in planning, decision-making, and creative work. Routine typing and checking may become less common. For years, the focused on faster chips and bigger models. Embiricos adds a new perspective. Human typing speed now plays a central role. Progress depends on better system design and smoother human-machine interaction. The message is clear. Smarter AI alone is not enough. Reducing human friction may decide how fast AGI becomes real.
[2]
Human typing speed is slowing the race to AGI, says senior OpenAI executive
Early adopters could see sharp productivity gains as soon as next year, with broader automation paving the way for AGI. Big tech companies like Meta, Google, and OpenAI are racing to develop artificial general intelligence (AGI). While the targets for achieving that appear to be far higher than expected, senior executives at these companies have been quite vocal about it as the industry moves towards AI. A senior OpenAI executive recently stated that human limitations such as typing speed and the time required to review AI-generated work could be one of the most significant impediments to the arrival of AGI. Speaking on Lenny's Podcast as cited by Business Insider, Alexander Embiricos, who heads product development for OpenAI's coding agent Codex, said progress toward AGI is increasingly constrained not by models or computing power, but by how quickly humans can interact with and supervise AI systems. As AI agents become capable of handling larger volumes of complex work, the need for humans to constantly write prompts and manually validate outputs is emerging as a key bottleneck, he argued. Embiricos stated that while AI agents can already observe and assist with tasks such as coding, productivity gains are limited if humans must manually review every output. According to him, if we want to unlock the next stage of growth, systems must be redesigned so that agents become reliable by default, reducing the need for constant human intervention. He stated that this shift is critical for triggering hockey stick productivity growth, which happens when gains are gradual for a period of time before accelerating sharply. According to Embiricos, early adopters may see a boost in productivity as soon as next year, with larger organisations following suit as workflows become more automated. While he cautioned that there is no single solution for fully autonomous AI systems and that different use cases will necessitate tailored approaches, Embiricos predicted that AGI will emerge during the transition period between early productivity gains and widespread enterprise automation.
Share
Share
Copy Link
Alexander Embiricos from OpenAI argues that human limitations like typing speed and manual review processes have become the primary constraint slowing AI productivity growth. While computing power and model size advance rapidly, the need for constant human supervision is now the critical bottleneck preventing progress towards AGI.
The race to artificial general intelligence faces an unexpected obstacle that has nothing to do with computing power or model sophistication. Alexander Embiricos, who heads product development for OpenAI's coding agent Codex, recently stated that human limitations such as human typing speed and the time required to review AI-generated work have become the most significant impediments to AI productivity growth
2
. Speaking on Lenny's Podcast, Embiricos explained that while AI agents can already handle complex tasks like coding, the constant need for humans to write prompts and manually validate outputs creates a fundamental bottleneck in human-machine interaction2
.
Source: Digit
This issue highlights a dramatic shift in the constraints facing progress towards AGI. For years, the AI industry focused on faster chips and bigger models, areas that now advance rapidly
1
. Human involvement now creates the biggest delay, according to Embiricos, affecting many industries using AI tools1
. As AI agents become capable of handling larger volumes of complex work, human review processes that require constant supervision emerge as the key constraint preventing organizations from unlocking significant productivity gains2
.Embiricos believes the next phase of growth needs a major shift in system design. AI agents must work reliably on their own, requiring less checking and fewer corrections
1
. According to him, if we want to unlock the next stage of growth, systems must be redesigned so that agents become AI systems reliable by default, reducing the need for constant human intervention and minimizing human supervision2
. When systems become dependable by default, AI productivity can rise sharply across sectors1
.
Source: Analytics Insight
Related Stories
Embiricos described AI productivity growth as gradual at first, then sudden—a pattern known as hockey stick productivity growth
1
. Early adopters of better automation may see clear productivity gains as soon as next year, with larger companies following as trust in autonomous systems increases2
. This change could drive strong gains across sectors as workflows become more automated1
. However, Embiricos cautioned against simple solutions, noting that every use case differs and fully autonomous AI systems need careful design1
.This shift affects the future of work in fundamental ways. By the time AI automation reaches its peak through widespread enterprise automation, human roles might focus primarily on planning, decision-making, and creative work, while routine typing and checking become less common
1
. Embiricos predicted that AGI will emerge during the transition period between early productivity gains and widespread enterprise automation, as organizations learn to trust AI agents with progressively more complex tasks2
. The message is clear: smarter AI alone is not enough. Reducing human friction through better system design may decide how fast AGI becomes real [1](https://www.analyticsinsight.net/news/openai-reveals/why-human-reviews-are-holding-back-ai-productivity-growth].Summarized by
Navi
[1]
06 Jan 2025•Technology

11 Nov 2024•Technology

10 Dec 2025•Business and Economy

1
Business and Economy

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology
