2 Sources
2 Sources
[1]
Song banned from Swedish charts for being AI creation
Backed by a finger-picked acoustic guitar melody, it weaves a tale of late-night heartbreak, broken promises and shattered hopes. "Your steps in the night, I hear them go," sings the artist known as Jacub in a haunting voice. "We stood in the rain at your gate and ran out and everything went fast. Now I know you are not mine, your promises came to nothing." It quickly became Sweden's biggest song of 2026 so far, amassing more than five million Spotify streams in a matter of weeks, putting it at the top of the platform's Swedish Top 50. However, journalists who began investigating Jacub's identity found that the artist had no significant social media profile, media appearances or tour dates. When investigative journalist Emanuel Karlsten began digging deeper, he found that the song was registered to a group of executives connected to Stellar Music, a music publishing and marketing firm based in Denmark. Two of the individuals work in Stellar's AI department. The producers - calling themselves Team Jacub - issued a lengthy email to Karlsten, insisting their creative process had been misunderstood. "We are not an anonymous tech company that just 'pressed a button,'" they wrote. "The team behind Jacub consists of experienced music creators, songwriters, and producers who have invested a lot of time, care, emotions, and financial resources." They described AI as a "tool" or an "assisting instrument" within a "human-controlled creative process". To Team Jacub, they said, the five million Spotify streams were proof of the song's "long-term artistic value." As to whether Jacub was a real person, Team Jacub gave a philosophical response. "That depends on how you define the term," they said. "Jacub is an artistic project developed and carried by a team of human songwriters, producers, and creators. The feelings, stories, and experiences in the music are real, because they come from real people." That response has not impressed the IFPI Sweden music industry organisation, which has blocked the song from appearing in the country's official national charts. "Our rule is that if it is a song that is mainly AI-generated, it does not have the right to be on the top list," said Ludvig Werner, head of IFPI. Sweden is positioning itself as a global laboratory for the AI economy, amid concerns that AI could cut revenues to the country's music creators by up to a quarter within the next two years. Music rights society Svenska Tonsättares Internationella Musikbyrå (STIM) launched a licensing system last September, allowing tech firms to legally train their AI models on copyrighted works in return for royalty payments. At the launch, Lina Heyman from STIM described the framework as "the world's first collective AI licence". She said it would "show that it is possible to embrace disruption without undermining human creativity." Sweden's chart ban on Jag vet, du är inte min is tougher than the approach taken by international organisations like Billboard, regarded as the world authority on music rankings. AI-generated tracks have featured in some of its specialist charts. Billboard says that its charts reflect the tastes of listeners. Tracks qualify if they meet its criteria for sales, streams and airplay, even if they have been generated by algorithms. Bandcamp, a platform known for supporting independent artists, has taken a stricter position, however. It has prohibited music that is "generated wholly or in substantial part by AI." That includes tracks composed or produced by AI or using voice clones. AI-generated music is forecast to explode in the coming years into an industry worth billions of pounds. As the needle drops on a new era of digital music creation, the controversy in Sweden over Jacub suggests that for now at least it is human musicians not machines who still call the tune.
[2]
Partly AI-generated folk-pop hit barred from Sweden's official charts
Song that topped Spotify in Sweden has been ruled ineligible after its creator was revealed to be partly AI-made A hit song has been excluded from Sweden's official chart after it emerged the "artist" behind it is an AI creation. I know, you're not mine - or Jag vet, du är inte min in Swedish - by a singer called Jacub has been a streaming success in Sweden, topping the Spotify rankings in the country. However, the Swedish music trade body has excluded the song from the domestic official chart after learning it was AI-generated. "Jacub's track has been excluded from Sweden's official chart, Sverigetopplistan, which is compiled by IFPI Sweden. While the song appears on Spotify's own charts, it does not qualify for inclusion on the official chart under the current rules," said an IFPI Sweden spokesperson. Ludvig Werber, IFPI Sweden's chief executive, said: "Our rule is that if it is a song that is mainly AI-generated, it does not have the right to be on the top list." I know, you're not mine is an acoustic guitar-led folk-pop song, with the artist's profile page on Spotify illustrated by a sketch of a bearded, T-shirt-wearing male. The song has been streamed more than 5m times globally, with 200,000 in Sweden. It is part of a six-track EP called Kärleken är Bränd, or Love is Burned. IFPI Sweden acted after an investigative journalist, Emanuel Karlsten, revealed the song was registered to a Danish music publisher called Stellar, with two of the credited rights holders working in the company's AI department. "What emerges is a picture of a music publisher that wants to experiment with new music and new kinds of artists. Who likes to push the limits of the audience's tolerance threshold for artificial music and artificial artists," wrote Karlsten. In a statement, Stellar said "the artist Jacub's voice and parts of the music are generated with the help of AI as a tool in our creative process". Stellar said it was "first and foremost" a music company run by creative professionals and not a tech or AI outfit. The company added that creating a hit song had required "something different" to simply prompting an AI tool to create a tune. "We are passionate and experienced music professionals who have invested large amounts of time, energy and dedication in the songwriting and production of this release, and the creation has been a process that has been guided by a clear artistic vision," said the company. Stellar also said it was against "AI music slop", the term for mass-produced AI content that is often nonsensical and surreal. Spotify does not require music to be labelled as AI generated, but has been cracking down on AI-made spam tracks as every play more than 30 seconds long generates a royalty for the scammer behind it - and dilutes payments to legitimate artists. Jacub is not the first AI artist to score a hit with audiences. A "band" called the Velvet Sundown amassed more than 1m streams on Spotify last year before it emerged the group was AI-generated, including its promotional images and backstory as well as the music. Its most popular song has now accumulated 4m streams on the platform. Ed Newton-Rex, a composer and campaigner for protecting artists' copyright, said Jacub's success underlined the need for mandatory AI labelling. "If Spotify told users when they were listening to AI music this wouldn't have made it so high in the charts, taking streams and royalties away from human musicians. Governments must require that AI-generated works be prominently labelled as a matter of urgency," he said. Last year Spotify, which is based in Sweden, said it is backing a new industry standard for disclosing the use of AI in creating a track. The product is being developed by a tech and music-industry backed non profit called DDEX. Artists' use of the standard on the platform will be voluntary, said Spotify, and they will not be forced to label music as entirely or partly AI created.
Share
Share
Copy Link
Sweden's music industry body IFPI Sweden has excluded a viral folk-pop song by 'Jacub' from its official charts after discovering the track was partly AI-generated music. The song amassed over 5 million Spotify streams and topped the platform's Swedish rankings before investigative journalist Emanuel Karlsten revealed its AI origins. The decision highlights tensions between AI music innovation and human creativity as the industry grapples with transparency and royalty payment concerns.
A haunting folk-pop track titled Jag vet, du är inte min (I know, you're not mine) by an artist called Jacub quickly became Sweden's biggest song of 2026 so far, accumulating more than 5 million Spotify streams globally and topping the platform's Swedish Top 50
1
2
. The acoustic guitar-led track weaves tales of late-night heartbreak and broken promises, resonating with listeners across the country. However, the song's meteoric rise came to an abrupt halt when IFPI Sweden banned it from the nation's official chart, Sverigetopplistan, after discovering its partly AI-generated origins2
.
Source: BBC
Investigative journalist Emanuel Karlsten uncovered that Jacub had no significant social media profile, media appearances, or tour dates
1
. His investigation revealed the song was registered to executives connected to Stellar Music, a Danish music publishing and marketing firm, with two individuals working in the company's AI department1
2
. The revelation prompted questions about transparency in AI music and whether listeners deserve to know when they're streaming AI-generated content.Ludvig Werner, head of IFPI Sweden, enforced a clear policy: "Our rule is that if it is a song that is mainly AI-generated, it does not have the right to be on the top list"
1
2
. The decision marks one of the strictest approaches to AI impact on the music industry globally, distinguishing Sweden's official charts from platforms like Billboard, which allows AI-generated tracks to appear in specialist charts if they meet criteria for sales, streams, and airplay1
.While the song remains on Spotify's own charts, it no longer qualifies for Sweden's official rankings under current rules
2
. This chart ban reflects growing concerns that AI music could cut revenues to Sweden's music creators by up to a quarter within the next two years1
. The decision also raises questions about royalty payments and whether AI-generated tracks dilute compensation for human artists who depend on streaming revenue.Producers behind the track, identifying themselves as Team Jacub, defended their work in a lengthy statement to Karlsten. "We are not an anonymous tech company that just 'pressed a button,'" they wrote, describing AI as a "tool" or "assisting instrument" within a "human-controlled creative process"
1
. Stellar Music emphasized that the team consists of experienced music creators, songwriters, and producers who invested significant time, care, and financial resources into the project1
.The company confirmed that "the artist Jacub's voice and parts of the music are generated with the help of AI as a tool in our creative process," but insisted they are "first and foremost" a music company run by creative professionals, not a tech or AI outfit
2
. Stellar also distanced itself from "AI music slop," the term for mass-produced AI content that floods platforms with nonsensical tracks2
. Their argument centers on preserving human creativity while embracing AI as a collaborative tool in music creation.Related Stories
Ed Newton-Rex, a composer and campaigner for protecting artists' copyright, argued that Jacub's success underscores the urgent need for mandatory AI labeling. "If Spotify told users when they were listening to AI music this wouldn't have made it so high in the charts, taking streams and royalties away from human musicians. Governments must require that AI-generated works be prominently labelled as a matter of urgency," he said
2
.Spotify currently does not require music to be labeled as AI-generated, though the platform has been cracking down on AI-made spam tracks where every play over 30 seconds generates a royalty for scammers
2
. Last year, Spotify announced support for a new industry standard for disclosing AI use, developed by DDEX, a tech and music-industry backed nonprofit. However, adoption remains voluntary, with artists not forced to label their work as entirely or partly AI-generated2
.Sweden is positioning itself as a global laboratory for the AI economy in music. Music rights society Svenska Tonsättares Internationella Musikbyrå (STIM) launched what it called "the world's first collective AI licence" last September, creating an AI licensing system that allows tech firms to legally train their models on copyrighted works in return for royalty payments
1
. Lina Heyman from STIM described the framework as showing "that it is possible to embrace disruption without undermining human creativity"1
.Other platforms have taken varied approaches. Bandcamp, known for supporting independent artists, prohibits music "generated wholly or in substantial part by AI," including tracks using voice clones
1
. Meanwhile, Billboard's charts reflect listener tastes regardless of AI involvement, allowing AI tracks if they meet sales, streams, and airplay criteria1
. Jacub isn't the first AI artist to find success—a "band" called Velvet Sundown amassed over 1 million streams last year before its AI origins were revealed, with its most popular song now reaching 4 million streams2
. As AI-generated music is forecast to explode into an industry worth billions in coming years, the Swedish charts controversy signals that music rights, transparency, and the balance between technology and human artists remain contested territory where the rules are still being written.Summarized by
Navi
12 Nov 2025•Entertainment and Society

08 Dec 2025•Entertainment and Society

01 Sept 2025•Technology

1
Technology

2
Science and Research

3
Policy and Regulation
