King Gizzard AI copycat evaded Spotify detection for weeks after band's protest exit

3 Sources

Share

Australian rock band King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard left Spotify in July to protest CEO Daniel Ek's investments in military AI technology. Weeks later, an AI-generated impersonator called King Lizard Wizard appeared on the platform, copying their songs with identical titles and lyrics. The copycat accumulated tens of thousands of streams before removal, exposing gaps in Spotify's content moderation despite policies announced in September to combat AI impersonations.

AI Impersonator Exploits King Gizzard's Spotify Absence

When King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard removed their music from Spotify in July, they were making a statement against CEO Daniel Ek's role as chair and major investor in military technology company Helsing

2

. The Australian experimental rock band had been vocal critics of the platform for years. But their protest created an unexpected opportunity for bad actors using generative AI to fill the void

3

.

Source: Engadget

Source: Engadget

A Reddit user discovered an AI music copycat artist called King Lizard Wizard in their Release Radar playlist, featuring tracks with identical titles and lyrics to King Gizzard's original songs

1

. The impersonator's album included AI-generated versions of songs like "Rattlesnake," using the band's original lyrics and attempting to mimic their psychedelic rock sound. The fake tracks even listed frontman Stu Mackenzie as composer and lyricist, adding insult to injury

3

.

Source: Futurism

Source: Futurism

Spotify's Content Moderation Gaps Exposed

The AI impersonations remained live on Spotify for weeks, accumulating tens of thousands of streams before being taken down

3

. This isn't the first time King Gizzard has been targeted—the band was previously hit by impersonators uploading "muzak" versions of their songs

3

. The incident raises serious questions about Spotify's spam filters and AI content moderation capabilities, particularly given that the platform announced new policies in September specifically designed to combat spam, impersonation, and deception

1

.

Spotify eventually removed King Lizard Wizard from its service, stating: "Spotify strictly prohibits any form of artist impersonation. The content in question was removed for violating our platform policies, and no royalties were paid out for any streams generated"

2

. However, the fact that the copycat appeared immediately below King Gizzard's abandoned official profile in search results—and that the AI version of "Rattlesnake" was the top song result—suggests significant gaps in the platform's detection systems

3

.

Industry Grapples with AI Music's Growing Threat

The King Gizzard case exemplifies a broader challenge facing the music industry as AI music becomes increasingly sophisticated. Spotify removed 75 million tracks thought to be made by AI artists last year, as fraudsters flood the platform with fake artists attempting to generate royalty payouts

2

. Deepfake versions of popular artists like Drake have also appeared online, while AI-manipulated tracks have entered mainstream charts

2

.

Mackenzie responded to the situation with despair, saying he was "trying to see the irony in this situation" but added: "Seriously wtf - we are truly doomed"

2

. One fan who discovered the AI tracks declared the situation "absolutely deplorable" and quit their Spotify account

3

.

What This Means for Artists and Platforms

Major labels Universal and Warner have recently struck deals with AI music companies Udio and Suno, which will allow users to create AI music from the work of real artists signed to those labels, with artists able to opt in and out

2

. While some industry figures like Eurythmics producer Dave Stewart describe AI in music as an "unstoppable force," others warn that artists could "end up on the sidelines with scraps" without proper protections around creative control, fair compensation, and clarity about deals involving their catalogues

2

.

The incident demonstrates that streaming platforms need more robust manual monitoring systems, especially for high-profile cases involving artists who have publicly departed their services. As AI-generated music tools become available to the general public, the challenge of distinguishing legitimate content from impersonations will only intensify, requiring platforms to invest heavily in detection technology and human oversight to protect both artists and listeners from exploitation.

Today's Top Stories

TheOutpost.ai

Your Daily Dose of Curated AI News

Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.

© 2025 Triveous Technologies Private Limited
Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo