Meta Faces Criticism for Labeling AI Models as 'Open-Source'

Meta criticised for calling its AI models 'open-source'

Meta has been criticised for calling its artificial intelligence models "open-source" by the group that has spearheaded open-source technology in the software world for the past 25 years. The social media company is "confusing" users and "polluting" the term open-source by using it to describe its Llama family of large language models, said Stefano Maffulli, head of the Open Source Initiative. The body coined the term open-source in the late 1990s and has been seen as the guardian of the concept ever since. Speaking in an interview with the FT, he said this was "extremely damaging" at a time when bodies such as the European Commission were seeking to support true open-source technologies that are beyond the control of any particular company. Llama, which Meta says has been downloaded more than 400mn times, has become the most popular among a wave of supposedly "open-source" AI models that have risen to challenge the leading proprietary systems such as OpenAI's GPT-4 and Google's Gemini. However, most of these, including Llama, stop short of full openness, preventing the kind of experimentation and adaptation in AI that open-source brought to the software world. By creating confusion about which models are truly open, Meta risks hampering the long-term development of forms of AI that are steered and controlled by users rather than being tightly controlled by a handful of tech companies, according to the OSI chief. Maffulli said Google and Microsoft had dropped their use of the term open-source for models that are not fully open, but that discussions with Meta had failed to produce a similar result. Meta said it was "committed to open-source AI" and that Llama "has been a bedrock of AI innovation globally". It added: "Existing open-source definitions for software do not encompass the complexities of today's rapidly advancing AI models. We are committed to keep working with the industry on new definitions to serve everyone safely and responsibly within the AI community." Many backers of fully open-source technologies still credit Meta's more limited Llama models with having broken the stranglehold of a handful of big US AI companies and opening the generative AI market to more competition. Meta's models have been "a breath of fresh air" for developers, said Dario Gil, head of research at IBM, giving them an alternative to what he called the "black box" models from the leading AI companies. However, transparency is limited. Meta lets developers download its Llama models free of charge, but the only technical details it publishes are the weights, or "biases", that influence how the model responds to particular prompts. In addition, the licence under which Llama has been released does not conform to the open-source definitions recognised by the OSI since it does not allow free use of the technology by Meta's largest rivals. Other tech groups, such as French AI company Mistral, have taken to calling models like this "open weight" rather than open-source. "Open weight [models] are great . . . but it's not enough to develop on," said Ali Farhadi, head of the Allen Institute for AI, which has released a fully open-source AI model called Olmo. Developers using models such as Llama can't see how they were developed or build on top of them to create new products of their own, as happened with open-source software, he added. To comply with the OSI's definition of open-source AI, which is set to be officially published next week, model developers need to be more transparent. Along with their models' weights, they should also disclose the training algorithms and other software used to develop them. OSI also called on AI companies to release the data on which their models were trained, though it conceded that privacy and other legal considerations sometimes prevent this. Maffulli said bodies such as the European Commission have sought to give special recognition to open-source in their regulations to encourage its use in widely used technology standards. If companies such as Meta succeed in turning it into a "generic term" that they can define for their own advantage, they will be able to "insert their revenue-generating patents into standards that the EC and other bodies are pushing for being really open," he warned.

Meta's AI Open-Source Claims Draw Criticism, OSI Pushes For Transparency - Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META)

OSI claims Meta's use of "open-source" misleads users, lacking full transparency typical of traditional open-source software. Meta Platforms Inc. META received criticism from the Open Source Initiative (OSI) for using the term "open-source" to describe its AI models. The criticism focuses on the company's Llama family of large language models, with OSI head Stefano Maffulli accusing Meta of misleading users and "polluting" the concept of open-source technology. Maffulli's comments in an interview with the Financial Times highlight concerns about Meta's claims when the European Commission and other bodies push for accurate open-source technology beyond any company's control. Also Read: Alibaba And Tencent Lap Up Meta's AI Large Language Model According to Maffulli, this confusion could undermine long-term efforts to create user-controlled AI systems rather than be dominated by a few tech giants. Meta has positioned Llama as a significant player in the AI space, claiming the model has been downloaded more than 400 million times. It's part of a broader wave of AI models challenging the proprietary systems of companies like Microsoft Corp MSFT backed OpenAI and Alphabet Inc GOOGL GOOG Google. However, Maffulli points out that Llama, like many other "open-source" models, does not provide the full transparency or flexibility that traditional open-source software allows. While Meta allows developers to access the model's weights, it restricts complete experimentation by keeping the development process and algorithms secret. At SIGGRAPH 2024, Meta chief Mark Zuckerberg emphasized his frustration with closed-source AI platforms, criticizing them for stifling innovation. He strongly preferred open-source models, arguing they allow for more creative freedom and development. Zuckerberg's stance aligns with his push for Meta's Llama 3.1, the company's largest open-source AI model. He also pointed out the irony of companies like OpenAI, which, despite their name, lead the development of closed-source AI models. Nvidia Corp NVDA recently introduced an open-source AI model. The new NVLM 1.0 family of large multimodal language models enhances text capabilities, vision, and language tasks. Additionally, Nvidia unveiled Unreal Engine 5 on-device plugins for its Ace platform, enabling AI-powered MetaHuman characters and new tools for developers to create AI-driven facial animations on Autodesk Maya. Price Action: META stock is up 0.63% at $580.40 premarket at last check Thursday. Also Read: Amazon Prime Video India to Introduce Ads in 2025, Intensifying Rivalry with Reliance and Disney+ Image via Shutterstock This content was partially produced with the help of AI tools and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors. Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs