9 Sources
[1]
We have an official open-source AI definition now, but the fight is far from over
RALEIGH, NC. -- The Open Source Initiative (OSI) released Open Source AI Definition (OSAID) 1.0 on Oct. 28, 2024, at the All Things Open conference. Creating it wasn't easy. It took the OSI almost two years to create and set up the OSAID. But with no change from the OSAID's last draft, it's
[2]
We finally have an 'official' definition for open source AI
There's finally an "official" definition of open source AI. The Open Source Initiative (OSI), a long-running institution aiming to define and "steward" all things open source, today released version 1.0 of its Open Source AI Definition (OSAID). The product of several years of collaboration with
[3]
The OSI clarifies what makes AI systems open-source, but most 'open' models fall short - SiliconANGLE
The OSI clarifies what makes AI systems open-source, but most 'open' models fall short The highly respected Open Source Initiative, which has a reputation for being one of the most prominent stewards of open-source software, has finally come up with an official definition on what makes artificial
[4]
What qualifies as open-source AI? Open Source Initiative clarifies
Disclaimer: This content generated by AI & may have errors or hallucinations. Edit before use. Read our Terms of use After sustained ambiguity around open-source artificial intelligence (AI), the Open Source Initiative (OSI) has introduced a definition for it. For companies to call their AI 'open
[5]
What Does Open-Source AI Actually Mean? There's Finally a Definition
Companies like Meta have been calling their products open source. They're not. In the buzzy world of AI, boring things like definitions often get overlooked. The term artificial intelligence itself is so broadly applied that it can refer to everything from linear regression models to killer
[6]
Meta, OSI tussle over definition of open source AI
Why it matters: Meta makes its Llama models freely available for others to use, but doesn't provide full disclosure of all of the elements that go into them. Driving the news: The Open Source Institute Monday published its definition of what constitutes a truly open source AI model, outlining four
[7]
Open-source AI must reveal its training data, per new OSI definition
"We will continue working with OSI and other industry groups to make AI more accessible and free responsibly, regardless of technical definitions," Eischen added. For 25 years, OSI's definition of open-source software has been widely accepted by developers who want to build on each other's work
[8]
Why Meta's 'open source' AI isn't all it seems
The Open Source Initiative has just set a new international definition for AI that could throw a spanner in the works for tech companies. Meta and some other technology firms rolling out so-called open source generative artificial intelligence (AI) models are "depriving the pubic from having
[9]
OSI unveils Open Source AI Definition 1.0
The Open Source Initiative (OSI) on Monday released the result of a year-long global community initiative to create a standard defining what, exactly, constitutes an open source artificial intelligence (AI) system. The Open Source AI Definition (OSAID) v1.0, unveiled at the All Things Open 2024
Share
Copy Link
The Open Source Initiative (OSI) has released the Open Source AI Definition (OSAID) 1.0, establishing criteria for what qualifies as open-source AI. This definition has sparked debate and disagreement among tech companies and AI developers.

The Open Source Initiative (OSI) has officially released version 1.0 of the Open Source AI Definition (OSAID) at the All Things Open conference on October 28, 2024
1
. This definition aims to establish clear criteria for what qualifies as open-source AI, addressing the growing need for standardization in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence.According to the OSI, for an AI system to be considered open-source, it must meet the following criteria:
2
The release of OSAID has sparked debate within the tech industry. While organizations like Mozilla Foundation, OpenInfra Foundation, and SUSE have endorsed the definition
1
, major players like Meta have expressed disagreement.Meta, which advertises its Llama models as open-source, argues that the new definition doesn't encompass the complexities of today's AI models
3
. The company's spokesperson stated, "There is no single open source AI definition, and defining it is a challenge because previous open source definitions do not encompass the complexities of today's rapidly advancing AI models"4
.Many AI models currently labeled as "open-source" fall short of the OSI's new definition:
3
3
2
Related Stories
A key point of contention is the requirement for transparency in training data. The OSI argues that without access to training data, an AI system cannot be truly open because the nature of how it works remains closed
4
. This requirement poses challenges for companies like Meta, which may use proprietary or sensitive data in their training processes1
.The introduction of OSAID is likely to have significant implications for AI development and regulation:
2
As the AI landscape continues to evolve, the OSI acknowledges that the definition may need to be adjusted over time to address emerging challenges and technologies in the field
5
.Summarized by
Navi
[3]
1
Technology

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology
