Musk-Altman Feud Escalates as New OpenAI Merger Revelations Surface

Elon Musk accuses Sam Altman of stealing a nonprofit after Tesla Roadster refund dispute

Serving tech enthusiasts for over 25 years. TechSpot means tech analysis and advice you can trust. Sounding off: Elon Musk and Sam Altman's most recent public spat that started over a Tesla Roadster refund has turned into a mudslinging match. Musk claims Altman did receive a refund and "stole a non-profit," while the OpenAI boss said his rival wanted Tesla to take over OpenAI, meaning "no nonprofit at all." The fight started last week when Altman posted three screenshots: a confirmation of his $50,000 reservation for a Tesla Roadster in July 2018, an email to Tesla he sent asking for a refund, and an image of the email message bouncing. Musk responded to Altman's post a day later with a single line that read, "You stole a non-profit." He followed that up soon after with a reply that claimed the email issue was fixed and Altman had received his refund. Musk added that Altman's failure to mention these facts was "in your nature." Altman and Musk have been at each other's throats for a long time now. The world's richest man was one of the co-founders, backers, and initial board members of OpenAI in 2015, departing the company in 2018 over what he said was a conflict of interest with Tesla. In 2024, Musk filed a lawsuit against Altman, OpenAI, and others claiming the company had abandoned its founding mission of developing AI for the benefit of humanity and was instead moving toward profit-maximization. OpenAI responded to the suit by publishing emails that Musk sent during his time at the company. The messages show he supported the firm's plan to create a for-profit arm and encouraged it to raise at least $1 billion in funding. He also suggested a merger with "cash cow" Tesla if OpenAI wanted to have any chance of competing against Google. Altman reminded Musk of these words in his recent reponse. Musk withdrew the OpenAI suit in June 2024, but filed a new lawsuit in August that year repeating the same claims. It was later expanded to include additional defendants, including Microsoft. In March, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers rejected Musk's bid for a preliminary injunction that would have blocked OpenAI's transition from a nonprofit. Part of the case is still set to go to jury trial in spring 2026. OpenAI now operates under a hybrid structure: it's still majority-controlled by the nonprofit, but runs its business through a for-profit arm called OpenAI LP. This setup lets the company raise money and form partnerships - most notably with Microsoft - while claiming to stay aligned with its original mission of developing AI that benefits everyone. Musk filed a separate lawsuit in August against OpenAI and Apple alleging their exclusive ChatGPT integration violates antitrust laws.

Musk vs. Altman: OpenAI Feud Fuels AI Arms Race and Startup Ecosystem Shifts

From court battles to infrastructure ventures, this conflict underscores the high stakes of artificial intelligence leadership and the growing urgency of acquiring both computational and strategic assets. In 2015, Musk and Altman established OpenAI with a unique vision in mind. They planned to make AI the spearhead of all technological advancements and ensure that the development of AI is both safe and more accessible. Together, they provided several advancements in the field of AI. Soon, things changed, and Altman's and Musk's paths started to diverge when OpenAI made its 2019 pivot from a nonprofit to a hybrid for-profit model. While Musk was the first to appreciate profit-driven business models, he was later heard rebuking OpenAI for straying from its mission of making AI the people's property. This resulted in a legal battle that involved suits, with Musk filing a case against OpenAI for fraud and breach of contract. In turn, OpenAI accused Musk's xAI of stealing its employees and engaging in actions such as disrupting the order of trade secrets related to its AI chatbot, Grok. Both have denied any of the allegations, terming the suit a business dispute that echoes the broader competitive war among AI firms.

Musk vs Altman flares up again after Ilya Sutskever confirms OpenAI's near-merger with Anthropic

The proposed merger reportedly collapsed due to practical challenges but exposed deep divisions within OpenAI's leadership. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Elon Musk are back in the spotlight, and this time tensions have risen as a result of new revelations about OpenAI's internal turmoil during the 2023 leadership crisis. Both fired back on X (formerly Twitter) after excerpts from former OpenAI chief scientist Ilya Sutskever's recent deposition surfaced online, revealing behind-the-scenes drama during Altman's brief ouster. In a series of posts on X, Musk accused Altman of theft, referring to alleged profiteering from OpenAI's mission, while Altman responded by claiming Musk once wanted Tesla to buy OpenAI outright. The OpenAI CEO appeared to downplay the spat, concluding with, "Can't we all just move on?" Musk, on the other hand, referred to Sutskever's October 2025 deposition as "a tale in 52 pages." Sutskever's testimony, which was part of Musk's ongoing lawsuit against OpenAI, revealed that the company's board considered a merger with rival AI startup Anthropic shortly after Altman's abrupt dismissal in November 2023. According to the deposition, board member Helen Toner was approached or contacted by Anthropic on November 18, one day after Altman and OpenAI president Greg Brockman were removed. According to reports, discussions included a proposal for Anthropic to take over OpenAI's leadership structure. Sutskever, who opposed the idea, said Toner appeared more open to it. The talks, however, collapsed due to "practical obstacles," capping off one of the most chaotic weeks in OpenAI's history. The board's decision to fire Altman, citing a loss of confidence, sparked widespread criticism, with nearly 700 of OpenAI's 770 employees threatening to leave unless he was reinstated. Under pressure from Microsoft and key investors, the board reversed its decision within days, restoring Altman and Brockman to their positions on November 22.