2 Sources
2 Sources
[1]
Suno and major music labels reportedly clash over AI music sharing
The AI-powered musicmaker Suno is struggling to reach licensing deals with Universal Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment. That's according to a report from the Financial Times, which says both sides can't agree on whether users should be able to share the AI-generated songs they create. "Universal wants AI-generated tracks to stay inside apps such as Suno and not spread freely across the internet. Suno, however, wants users to be able to share and distribute those songs more widely," the Financial Times reports. Suno, which lets users create AI-generated music with a text prompt, became the subject of a massive copyright lawsuit from Universal, Sony, and Warner Records in 2024. Suno allows users to download AI-generated music from the app, raising concerns about the spread of fake music and AI rip-offs of existing songs. Earlier this year, a coalition of artist representatives signed an open letter titled "Say No to Suno," arguing that the platform "built its business on our backs, scraping the world's cultural output without permission, then competing against the very works exploited." Warner dropped its lawsuit against Suno last year after the two reached a licensing agreement, allowing Suno users to use the voices, names, likenesses, images, and compositions of artists who opt into the program. And while Universal has struck a deal with the AI music-making tool, Udio, its deal bars users from downloading their AI-generated creations from the app.
[2]
Top record labels and start-up Suno hit impasse in talks over AI-generated music
Talks over licensing deals between the world's largest record companies and start-up Suno have reached a stalemate, exposing deep divisions over how the industry should respond to the rise of AI-generated music. There had been little substantive progress in discussions between Universal Music and Suno in recent months, according to people familiar with the matter, and no agreement had been reached with Sony, as the music behemoths reject the start-up's model for distributing AI-generated music. "We have ongoing engagement, but there is no path forward with the current proposal," said a person involved in the negotiations. People familiar with the talks said there had been little progress since Warner Music, the third-largest label, struck a deal with Suno in November. Suno, one of the most prominent AI music companies, allows users to create songs in seconds using simple text prompts. It was valued at $2.45bn in a funding round last year and said it had 2mn paying subscribers. The impasse goes to the heart of a broader fight over the future of music as companies across the media landscape have wrestled with how to protect their copyrights against AI. Record labels argue tools including Suno rely on music made by human artists, and AI groups should pay for their use. So far, the companies cannot agree on what that would look like. While executives said discussions remain active, one central disagreement was over what happens to songs once they are created. Universal wants AI-generated tracks to stay inside apps such as Suno and not spread freely across the internet. Suno, however, wants users to be able to share and distribute those songs more widely. This had become a "major roadblock", said a person involved in the talks, adding that "there's no point exchanging conditions to dot I's and cross T's" while the two sides remain at odds. The tensions extend beyond the labels. Earlier this year, a coalition of artists and industry groups urged the music business to reject Suno, arguing its technology uses artists' work without consent. Suno said in a statement: "We want to work cooperatively with the music industry to unlock new sources of revenue for artists." The stand-off comes at a sensitive moment for the industry. Shares in big music companies have fallen to three-year lows amid fears over AI. Investors are watching closely for licensing deals that could determine whether the technology becomes a threat or a new source of growth. In June 2024, the three major record labels sued Suno and rival Udio for copyright infringement. Suno fired back, with chief executive Mikey Shulman accusing the music companies of "reverting to their old lawyer-led playbook". The sides later opened licensing discussions to settle the disputes. Universal, the largest music company, has struck licensing deals with several AI groups in recent months, including Udio, Klay Vision, Stability AI and Nvidia. Sony has also reached an agreement with Klay Vision. Universal wants AI music to work like a premium feature that listeners would pay extra for within apps such as Spotify, rather than a tool that lets anyone create and distribute songs across the internet. As part of Universal's settlement with Udio, users cannot download the songs they create, so the music stays inside the app.
Share
Share
Copy Link
Licensing negotiations between AI music platform Suno and major record companies Universal Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment have hit an impasse over how AI-generated music should be shared. While Warner Music struck a deal in November, the remaining labels want AI tracks confined to apps, not freely distributed online.
Talks between Suno and the world's largest music labels have ground to a halt, exposing fundamental disagreements about the future of AI-generated music. According to a report from the Financial Times, licensing negotiations between the AI music platform and both Universal Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment have made little substantive progress in recent months
2
. The impasse in talks centers on a seemingly simple but consequential question: what happens to songs after users create them with a text prompt.
Source: FT
The core dispute revolves around AI music sharing and content control. Universal Music Group wants AI-generated tracks to stay inside apps such as Suno and not spread freely across the internet, treating AI music like a premium feature that listeners would pay extra for within platforms such as Spotify
2
. Suno, however, wants users to be able to share and distribute those songs more widely1
. This disagreement has become a "major roadblock," according to people involved in the talks, with one source stating "there's no point exchanging conditions to dot I's and cross T's" while the two sides remain fundamentally at odds2
.
Source: The Verge
Music labels argue that copyright protection must be central to any agreement, as tools including Suno rely on music made by human artists. The platform allows users to download AI-generated music from the app, raising concerns about the spread of fake music and AI rip-offs of existing songs
1
. This battle over intellectual property reflects broader tensions in the music industry. In June 2024, Universal, Sony, and Warner Records filed a copyright lawsuit against Suno and rival Udio for copyright infringement2
. Suno CEO Mikey Shulman fired back, accusing the music companies of "reverting to their old lawyer-led playbook"2
.Warner Music dropped its lawsuit against Suno last year after reaching a licensing agreement in November, allowing Suno users to use the voices, names, likenesses, images, and compositions of artists who opt into the program
1
. However, there has been little progress in discussions since that deal was struck2
. Universal has struck licensing deals with several AI groups in recent months, including Udio, Klay Vision, Stability AI, and Nvidia, while Sony Music Entertainment has also reached an agreement with Klay Vision2
. Notably, Universal's settlement with Udio bars users from downloading their AI-generated creations from the app, keeping the music confined within the platform1
.Related Stories
The tensions extend beyond the labels themselves. Earlier this year, a coalition of artist representatives signed an open letter titled "Say No to Suno," arguing that the platform "built its business on our backs, scraping the world's cultural output without permission, then competing against the very works exploited"
1
. This coalition urged the music industry to reject Suno, arguing its technology uses artists' work without consent2
. Suno, valued at $2.45bn in a funding round last year with 2mn paying subscribers, maintains it wants to "work cooperatively with the music industry to unlock new sources of revenue for artists"2
.The stand-off comes at a sensitive moment for the music industry. Shares in big music companies have fallen to three-year lows amid fears over AI's impact on intellectual property
2
. Investors are watching closely for licensing deals that could determine whether the technology becomes a threat or a new source of growth. "We have ongoing engagement, but there is no path forward with the current proposal," said a person involved in the negotiations2
. The outcome of these negotiations will likely set precedents for how the entire music industry navigates the rise of AI-generated content and balances innovation with protecting the rights and livelihoods of human artists.Summarized by
Navi
03 Jun 2025•Business and Economy

02 Aug 2024

19 Nov 2025•Business and Economy
