Waymo Robotaxi Strikes Child Near School, Sparking Federal Probe Into AI Driver Safety

Reviewed byNidhi Govil

2 Sources

Share

A Waymo robotaxi struck a child who ran into the street near a Santa Monica elementary school, prompting a federal investigation into autonomous vehicle safety. The incident, which resulted in no reported injuries, has intensified debate over whether self-driving technology can match human judgment in complex scenarios like school zones, even as the company claims its AI driver reacted faster than any human could have.

Waymo Robotaxi Struck a Child During School Drop-Off

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has opened an investigation after a Waymo robotaxi struck a child near an elementary school in Santa Monica last week

1

. The child ran into the street from behind a double-parked SUV during normal school drop-off hours, when other children, a crossing guard, and several double-parked vehicles were present in the area

2

. Santa Monica Police reported that first responders evaluated the student with her parent present and did not report any injuries

1

. The incident has triggered renewed scrutiny of autonomous vehicle safety and whether self-driving technology is ready for widespread deployment in complex urban environments.

The Robot vs. Human Driver Debate Intensifies

Waymo claims its driverless vehicle performed as expected, with the AI driver immediately detecting the child and braking hard, reducing speed from approximately 17 mph to under 6 mph before contact

1

2

. According to the company's computer modeling, a fully attentive human driver in the same situation would have hit the child at approximately 14 mph

1

. Waymo argued in a Jan. 28 blog post that this significant reduction in impact speed demonstrates the material safety benefit of autonomous vehicles over human drivers

1

. The company's response, however, has been criticized for lacking empathy and appearing to blame the child for the incident

2

.

Source: Axios

Source: Axios

Safety Experts Question Context and Human Judgment

While faster reaction times offer advantages, safety experts argue that autonomous vehicle safety requires more than quick reflexes. Philip Koopman, an AV safety expert and emeritus professor at Carnegie Mellon University, notes that young drivers have quicker reflexes but older drivers have much better safety records

1

. He suggests that a careful, competent human driver would have avoided a panic stop entirely by adjusting their driving behavior amid the chaos of school drop-off or taking a different route altogether

1

. Missy Cummings, former senior safety advisor at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and now head of the autonomy and robotics center at George Mason University, has called for Waymo to share video of the incident to provide more context, including what the child was doing before emerging from behind the car

1

. The investigation will examine whether the robotaxi exercised appropriate caution in a school zone

1

.

Pattern of School Zone Incidents Raises Concerns

This incident occurred just days after the Austin Independent School District in Texas reported that Waymo robotaxis were failing to stop for school buses and called for the company to cease operations during morning and afternoon school hours

2

. The district stated bluntly that software updates are clearly not working as intended nor as quickly as required, and that they cannot allow Waymo to continue endangering students while attempting to implement fixes

2

. Waymo was already facing scrutiny after one of its self-driving cars was caught on video illegally passing a stopped school bus letting children off in Atlanta, Georgia

2

. These repeated incidents underscore concerns about how Waymo prioritizes child safety in its AI models

2

.

Source: Electrek

Source: Electrek

Public Trust and Industry Implications at Stake

The incident fits into a larger debate about whether autonomous vehicles can match or exceed the safety of human drivers, a question crucial to winning public trust as robotaxis spread across America

1

. While people fear self-driving cars, nearly 40,000 people are killed each year in traffic accidents involving human drivers

1

. The timing is particularly challenging for Waymo as the company deploys vehicles in rising numbers across US cities including San Francisco and Miami, racing to demonstrate growth that justifies continued investment

2

. GM has already shuttered its own self-driving taxi business, GM's Cruise, after investing more than $12 billion, and Tesla appears unable to make its camera-only robotaxi solution work without human safety monitors

2

.

Insurance Industry and Regulatory Response

The debate is already playing out in the insurance industry, where autonomous vehicles are testing how risk is priced

1

. At least one online provider, Lemonade, examined Tesla's data and concluded its Full Self-Driving software was safer than human driving, warranting a 50% rate cut

1

. The US Senate's Commerce Committee has scheduled a hearing on self-driving car safety for February 4, 2026, which will include testimony from Waymo's Chief Safety Officer, Mauricio Peña

2

. As the investigation unfolds, the fundamental question remains: Are humans holding robots to a higher standard than themselves? So far, the answer is yes

1

.

Today's Top Stories

TheOutpost.ai

Your Daily Dose of Curated AI News

Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.

© 2026 Triveous Technologies Private Limited
Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo