2 Sources
2 Sources
[1]
Activist groups urge Congress to pause datacenter buildouts
More than 230 organizations across America have signed a letter calling for a moratorium on the construction of datacenters, claiming the current building boom represents a huge environmental and social threat. The open letter [PDF], sent to members of the US Congress by campaign group Food & Water Watch, complains that the AI-driven wave of datacenter expansion is stoking demand for more energy, which in turn leads to further greenhouse gas emissions, straining water resources, and higher electricity prices for ordinary consumers across the country. Organizations endorsing the letter collectively represent millions of citizens across all 50 US states, the group claims. It urges members of Congress to suspend the construction of new facilities until adequate regulations are enacted to protect communities and the environment from the damage it claims is already being inflicted. Investment in datacenters has hit an all-time high, thanks mostly to the burgeoning requirements of training and serving AI. Analyst firm Omdia estimates global datacenter capex will top $657 billion by the end of 2025, almost double the figure of just two years ago, with the US dominating this spending. In hotspots such as Virginia, hyperscale datacenter capacity is greater than the entire capacity of China or the whole of Europe, according to previous figures. This comes at a cost, as those facilities consumed nearly twice as much power in the second half of 2024 compared to the prior six months. Overall, datacenters' water consumption increased by almost two-thirds over the past five years. Ordinary Americans will likely pay for all this extra power generating capacity and the grid infrastructure needed to carry it, with a report out last year warning that US consumers could face a 70 percent hike in their electricity bills by 2030. In addition, it emerged last month that some states are keeping citizens in the dark about the subsidies they use to attract datacenter companies to their territory, which means many projects are being funded at the expense of taxpayers. Even worse, all these new datacenters are causing greater greenhouse gas emissions, with hyperscale operators such as Microsoft and Google admitting their emissions have risen over the past several years, in spite of their commitments to reach net-zero by the end of the decade. The demand for power has spurred a resurgence in coal-fired power generation, one of the dirtiest, most polluting ways of producing electricity. And datacenters generating their own energy on-site are also contributing to the problem, as demonstrated by the Colossus facility run by Elon Musk's xAI, which was accused of being one of the largest sources of smog-generating nitrogen oxides (NOx) in the Memphis area thanks to its fleet of gas turbines. "At a time when millions of Americans are already struggling with soaring utility costs, the sudden explosion of the Big Data industry represents an existential threat for communities ill-equipped to handle the massive environmental and economic hardships these datacenters inflict," stated Food & Water Watch executive director Wenonah Hauter. "The only prudent action is to halt the unfettered expansion of this dangerous industry in order to properly examine all manner of potential harm before it's too late," she added. Good luck with that. As far as the Trump administration is concerned, the US is in a race with China for AI supremacy, and it can only win by investing more in compute muscle to underpin AI development. US Interior Secretary Doug Burgum went as far to claim that: "The real existential threat right now is not a degree of climate change. It's the fact that we could lose the [AI] arms race if we don't have enough power." Trump himself pledged to remove obstacles to connecting datacenters to the electricity grid at the federal level during a White House dinner held for tech industry oligarchs in September. And AI investment is the only thing keeping the America out of a recession right now, as economists disclosed in October. The datacenter industry is aware that it isn't entirely loved, as was revealed at an industry event in June. A Microsoft exec complained there are "communities that don't want us there.". The consensus was not that the industry needs to change, more that the public should be better informed about what datacenters actually do and the applications and industries which depend upon them. The industry should get people to think of bit barns as vital utilities, like water and electricity. ®
[2]
Environmental groups call for national moratorium on AI data centers
More than 230 environmental organizations, including Food & Water Watch, Friends of the Earth, and Greenpeace, last week urged members of Congress to support a national moratorium on the approval and construction of new data centers. The groups have cited rising electricity and water consumption as energy demand for data centers has soared. Consumers have also expressed concerns regarding utility bills. The letter to Congress stated, "The rapid, largely unregulated rise of data centers to fuel the AI and crypto frenzy is disrupting communities across the country and threatening Americans' economic, environmental, climate and water security." Studies have linked higher energy prices to the establishment of new data centers in a region. A recent survey, commissioned by solar installer Sunrun, found that 80% of consumers worried about data centers negatively affecting their utility bills. Electricity prices have already increased 13% this year in the US, marking the largest annual rise in the past decade. The impact is expected to be most significant in Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Illinois, and New Jersey, which are slated for the largest increases in data center capacity. Energy demand for data centers is projected to nearly triple in the coming decade, from 40 gigawatts today to 106 gigawatts by 2035, with much of this growth occurring in rural areas. "All this compounds the significant and concerning impacts AI is having on society, including lost jobs, social instability and economic concentration," the environmental groups said. Proposed data centers recently became points of contention. Last week, protestors demonstrated outside the headquarters of utility DTE in Detroit. The company is seeking approval from the Michigan Public Service Commission to supply OpenAI and Oracle with electricity for a 1.4 gigawatt data center. Protestors cited concerns about increased electricity bills, excessive fresh water usage, and traffic congestion. Also last week, authorities arrested three individuals in Wisconsin during a common council meeting regarding a 902 megawatt data center planned as part of OpenAI and Oracle's Stargate project.
Share
Share
Copy Link
More than 230 environmental organizations are calling on US Congress to impose a moratorium on new datacenter construction, citing the AI-driven expansion's impact on energy consumption, water resources, and electricity bills. With global datacenter spending projected to hit $657 billion by 2025 and energy demand expected to triple by 2035, the campaign highlights mounting tensions between AI development and environmental sustainability.
More than 230 environmental organizations across America, including Food & Water Watch, Friends of the Earth, and Greenpeace, have signed an open letter urging US Congress to impose a moratorium on new datacenter construction
1
2
. The campaign targets what activists describe as an AI-driven expansion that threatens communities with environmental damage and economic hardship. The letter calls for suspending datacenter buildouts until adequate regulations protect citizens from rising utility costs, greenhouse gas emissions, and water consumption1
.
Source: The Register
The moratorium on new datacenter construction comes as global datacenter capital expenditure is projected to reach $657 billion by the end of 2025, nearly double the figure from just two years earlier
1
. Energy demand for datacenters is expected to nearly triple in the coming decade, from 40 gigawatts today to 106 gigawatts by 2035, with much of this growth concentrated in rural areas2
. Virginia has emerged as a critical hotspot, where hyperscale datacenter capacity exceeds that of all of China or the entire European continent1
. These facilities consumed nearly twice as much power in the second half of 2024 compared to the prior six months, while water consumption increased by almost two-thirds over the past five years1
.American consumers face significant financial consequences from increased energy consumption tied to AI and cryptocurrency operations. A 2024 report warned that US consumers could see a 70 percent hike in their electricity bills by 2030
1
. Electricity prices have already increased 13 percent this year, marking the largest annual rise in the past decade2
. A recent survey commissioned by solar installer Sunrun found that 80 percent of consumers worried about datacenters negatively affecting their utility bills2
. The impact is expected to be most significant in Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Illinois, and New Jersey, which are slated for the largest increases in datacenter capacity2
. Some states are keeping citizens in the dark about subsidies used to attract datacenter companies, meaning many projects are funded at taxpayer expense1
.Greenhouse gas emissions from datacenters have escalated despite corporate commitments to reach net-zero by the end of the decade. Hyperscale operators such as Microsoft and Google have admitted their emissions have risen over the past several years
1
. The demand for power has spurred a resurgence in coal-fired power generation, one of the dirtiest forms of electricity production1
. Elon Musk's xAI Colossus facility was accused of being one of the largest sources of smog-generating nitrogen oxides in the Memphis area due to its fleet of gas turbines1
. Food & Water Watch executive director Wenonah Hauter stated, "At a time when millions of Americans are already struggling with soaring utility costs, the sudden explosion of the Big Data industry represents an existential threat for communities ill-equipped to handle the massive environmental and economic hardships these datacenters inflict"1
.Related Stories
The Trump administration has positioned AI development as critical to national security, creating significant political obstacles for the moratorium. US Interior Secretary Doug Burgum claimed that "the real existential threat right now is not a degree of climate change. It's the fact that we could lose the [AI] arms race if we don't have enough power"
1
. Trump pledged to remove obstacles to connecting datacenters to grid infrastructure at the federal level during a White House dinner for tech industry leaders in September1
. AI investment is currently keeping America out of recession, according to economists who disclosed this information in October1
.Local resistance to datacenter projects has intensified across multiple states. Last week, protesters demonstrated outside the headquarters of utility DTE in Detroit, where the company is seeking approval from the Michigan Public Service Commission to supply OpenAI and Oracle with electricity for a 1.4 gigawatt datacenter
2
. Protesters cited concerns about increased electricity bills, excessive fresh water usage, and traffic congestion. Authorities arrested three individuals in Wisconsin during a common council meeting regarding a 902 megawatt datacenter planned as part of OpenAI and Oracle's Stargate project2
. The environmental groups stated that "all this compounds the significant and concerning impacts AI is having on society, including lost jobs, social instability and economic concentration"2
. A Microsoft executive acknowledged at an industry event in June that "communities don't want us there," though the consensus was that the public should be better informed about what datacenters do rather than changing industry practices1
.Summarized by
Navi
[1]
02 Dec 2025•Policy and Regulation

11 Aug 2025•Policy and Regulation

15 Nov 2025•Business and Economy

1
Science and Research

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology
