Apple Faces Legal Battle Over Alleged Use of Copyrighted Books in AI Training

Reviewed byNidhi Govil

5 Sources

Share

Apple is sued by authors for allegedly using copyrighted books without permission to train its AI models, joining a growing trend of legal challenges in the AI industry over intellectual property rights.

Apple Faces Copyright Infringement Lawsuit

Apple, the tech giant known for its innovative products, is now embroiled in a legal battle over its artificial intelligence (AI) practices. Authors Grady Hendrix and Jennifer Roberson have filed a proposed class-action lawsuit against Apple, accusing the company of illegally using copyrighted books to train its AI systems without consent, credit, or compensation

1

.

Source: NDTV Gadgets 360

Source: NDTV Gadgets 360

The Allegations

The lawsuit, filed in the federal court in Northern California, specifically targets Apple's "OpenELM" large language models. The plaintiffs allege that Apple used a dataset called Books3, which they claim is "a known body of pirated books," to train its AI models

2

. The authors assert that their works were part of this unauthorized dataset.

According to the complaint, Apple's use of the RedPajama dataset, which includes Books3, is documented in the company's paper about OpenELM, an open-source model made available on Hugging Face last year

2

.

Broader Industry Implications

This lawsuit is part of a growing trend of legal challenges in the AI industry over intellectual property rights. Other major tech companies, including Microsoft, Meta Platforms, and OpenAI, have faced similar allegations

1

.

The case against Apple comes on the heels of a significant settlement by Anthropic, an AI startup backed by Amazon and Alphabet. Anthropic agreed to pay $1.5 billion to settle a class action from authors who accused the company of using their books to train its AI chatbot Claude without permission

3

.

Legal Landscape and Precedents

Source: 9to5Mac

Source: 9to5Mac

The legal landscape surrounding AI and copyright is still evolving. While some companies face substantial settlements, others have secured favorable rulings. For instance, Meta recently won a summary judgment when a federal judge ruled its AI training practices constitute fair use under copyright law

4

.

Apple's Response and Future Implications

Apple has not yet responded to requests for comment on the lawsuit

5

. However, the company had previously stated that OpenELM does not power its AI features under the Apple Intelligence branding or other machine learning features in its devices. Apple emphasized that the model was created as a "contribution to the research community"

3

.

The outcome of this lawsuit could have significant implications for the AI industry, potentially setting precedents for how companies approach the use of copyrighted materials in AI training. As the legal battle unfolds, it will likely contribute to the ongoing debate about balancing innovation with intellectual property rights in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence.

TheOutpost.ai

Your Daily Dose of Curated AI News

Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.

© 2025 Triveous Technologies Private Limited
Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo