JD Vance agrees with David Lammy that sexualised AI images on X are 'entirely unacceptable'

JD Vance Aligns with UK on AI-Generated Deepfakes Crisis

US Vice President JD Vance has expressed agreement with David Lammy that sexualised AI images created on platforms like X are "entirely unacceptable," marking a significant moment in the transatlantic debate on AI regulation1

1

. During their meeting in Washington on Thursday, the UK deputy prime minister raised concerns about Elon Musk's Grok chatbot being used to manipulate thousands of images of women and children, removing clothing or placing them in sexual positions1

1

. Vance, typically known as an AI enthusiast, expressed concern about how the technology was fueling "hyper-pornographied slop" online, according to sources at the meeting2

2

.

UK Threatens Action as X Makes Limited Changes

The controversy has escalated into a potential regulatory crisis, with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer warning that X could be blocked in the country after "unlawful" and "disgusting" images were generated1

1

. Media regulator Ofcom confirmed it would accelerate an investigation into X, with technology secretary Liz Kendall stating she would support a ban if the platform failed to comply with UK laws1

1

. The Internet Watch Foundation reported that criminals have been using Grok to create child sexual abuse imagery, raising the stakes considerably2

2

. In response, X appeared to change Grok's settings on Friday, with the chatbot telling users that only paid subscribers could manipulate images. However, reports suggested this only applied to requests made in reply to other posts, with other editing methods remaining accessible1

1

. Downing Street described these changes as "insulting"2

2

.

Elon Musk Pushes Back Against Censorship Claims

Elon Musk has responded defiantly to potential regulatory actions, writing on X that the UK government "want any excuse for censorship" and describing the British government as "fascist"1

1

. He shared a post from US congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna threatening sanctions against the UK if it blocked X1

1

. Despite this combative stance, Musk had previously stated that anyone using Grok to make illegal content would face the same consequences as if they had uploaded it2

2

. The AI misuse has primarily affected women, with X users reporting that accounts have used Grok to generate images of them without clothing since the start of the new year2

2

.

What This Means for AI Regulation

Lammy told The Guardian he found Vance "sympathetic" to the UK's position, stating: "I think he recognised the very seriousness with which images of women and children could be manipulated in this way, and he recognised how despicable, unacceptable, that is"1

1

. The two men remained in contact following their meeting, with Vance confirming he had seen X's announced changes1

1

. This alignment between a typically pro-AI US administration figure and UK regulators signals growing concern about deepfakes and AI-generated content across political divides. As Ofcom accelerates its investigation, the question remains whether X's limited modifications will satisfy regulators or if more comprehensive measures will be demanded to prevent the platform from becoming a vehicle for AI misuse and abuse imagery creation.