2 Sources
2 Sources
[1]
Opinion | How Trump's Tariffs Play Right Into China's Hands
After two trips to China in the last four months, I've been trying to say this every way I know how: Folks, you just don't understand. Covid had terrible effects on human health and mortality, but it also had a terrible effect on our ability to understand China. American and European business executives left China in droves at the start of the pandemic. Very, very few of them ever went back afterward. They entrusted their China businesses to local managers. While they were gone, Beijing took a great leap forward in advanced manufacturing that the world missed. It has created a manufacturing engine the likes of which may never have been seen in history. China already controls one-third of all global manufacturing (up from 6 percent in 2000), and whether you are talking about cars or robots or phones, what is coming out of China today is not just cheaper and faster. It is cheaper, faster, better and smarter -- and it is all about to be dramatically supercharged by China's headlong rush to put artificial intelligence into everything it makes. Sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter Get expert analysis of the news and a guide to the big ideas shaping the world every weekday morning. Get it sent to your inbox. This engine is the product of decades of massive government investments in education, infrastructure and research, behind walls of protection -- in a society where people are ready to work from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., six days a week. While China was building that, America's biggest new industry was political polarization and getting its children addicted to TikTok and Instagram. Read my newsroom colleague Keith Bradsher's article from China on Monday: Recent data from China's central bank shows that state-controlled banks lent an extra $1.9 trillion to industrial borrowers over the past four years. On the fringes of cities all over China, new factories are being built day and night, and existing factories are being upgraded with robots and automation. China's investments and advances in manufacturing are producing a wave of exports that threatens to cause factory closings and layoffs not just in the United States but also around the globe. "The tsunami is coming for everyone," said Katherine Tai, who was the United States Trade Representative for former President Joseph R. Biden Jr. That is why President Trump's strategy is so foolish. Instead of putting tariffs on the whole world, we should be looking to line up all our industrial allies in a united front to say to China: You cannot make everything for everyone. While China is one-third of global manufacturing production, it accounts for only 13 percent of global consumption. That is not sustainable -- and it is not just freaking out the U.S. and Europe but also Brazil, Indonesia, India and others; even Russia has suddenly cut back on auto imports from China. Instead of making our strategy America against the whole world on tariffs, Trump should have made it all the industrial democracies, led by America, against China. The purpose would be to effectively negotiate a way forward that both compels China to redirect its energies inward -- to investing in its meager social safety net and health care system and stimulating its domestic demand -- while inviting China to build new factories, not in Hanoi but in Hamtramck, Mich., and to transfer its technologies and supply chains to us in 50-50 joint ventures. Unfortunately, our president and vice president were so busy flexing their muscles in Greenland, firing our top generals for not being sufficiently slavish to our Dear Leader and insulting our European allies for being too woke that they have squandered the leverage we needed to deal effectively with this formidable Chinese engine. But here is what America's business leaders really don't understand: Trump and JD Vance have freaked out China and the E.U. by their erratic behavior. When they see a U.S. president just ignore a trade agreement with Mexico and Canada -- U.S.M.C.A. -- that he himself negotiated, they ask themselves: How can we trust any deal we cut with him? This could drive China and the E.U. closer together. I hear my fellow Americans say: We just have to get to the midterms and have the Democrats regain the House, and we will be OK. Sorry, folks, we cannot wait that long. Another 20 months or so of this erratic leadership, and our country will be irredeemably broken. We need a handful of Republicans in the House and the Senate -- right now -- to cross the aisle and put a stop to this devastating man-made economic disaster.
[2]
How Trump's tariffs play right into China's hands
After two trips to China in the past four months, I've been trying to say this every way I know how: Folks, you just don't understand. COVID had terrible effects on human health and mortality, but it also had a terrible effect on our ability to understand China. American and European business executives left China in droves at the start of the pandemic. Very, very few of them ever went back. They entrusted their China businesses to local managers. While they were gone, Beijing took a great leap forward in advanced manufacturing that the world missed. It has created a manufacturing engine the likes of which may never have been seen in history. China controls one-third of all global manufacturing (up from 6% in 2000), and whether you are talking about cars or robots or phones, what is coming out of China today is not just cheaper and faster. It is cheaper, faster, better and smarter -- and it is all about to be dramatically supercharged by China's headlong rush to put artificial intelligence into everything it makes. This engine is the product of decades of massive government investments in education, infrastructure and research, behind walls of protection -- in a society where people are ready to work from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., six days a week. While China was building that, America's biggest new industry was political polarization and getting its children addicted to TikTok and Instagram. From my newsroom colleague Keith Bradsher's article from China on Monday: "Recent data from China's central bank shows that state-controlled banks lent an extra $1.9 trillion to industrial borrowers over the past four years. On the fringes of cities all over China, new factories are being built day and night, and existing factories are being upgraded with robots and automation. China's investments and advances in manufacturing are producing a wave of exports that threatens to cause factory closings and layoffs not just in the United States but also around the globe. 'The tsunami is coming for everyone,' said Katherine Tai, who was the United States Trade Representative for former President Joseph R. Biden Jr." That is why President Donald Trump's strategy is so foolish. Instead of putting tariffs on the whole world, we should be looking to line up all our industrial allies in a united front to say to China: You cannot make everything for everyone. While China controls one-third of global manufacturing production, it accounts for only 13% of global consumption. That is not sustainable -- and it is not just freaking out the U.S. and Europe but also Brazil, Indonesia, India and others; even Russia has suddenly cut back on auto imports from China. Instead of making our strategy America against the whole world on tariffs, Trump should have made it all the industrial democracies, led by America, against China. The purpose would be to effectively negotiate a way forward that both compels China to redirect its energies inward -- to investing in its meager social safety net and health care system and stimulating its domestic demand -- while inviting China to build new factories, not in Hanoi, Vietnam, but in Hamtramck, Michigan, and to transfer its technologies and supply chains to us in 50-50 joint ventures. Unfortunately, our president and vice president were so busy flexing their muscles in Greenland, firing our top generals for not being sufficiently slavish to our Dear Leader and insulting our European allies for being too woke that they have squandered the leverage we needed to deal effectively with this formidable Chinese engine. But here is what America's business leaders really don't understand: Trump and Vice President JD Vance have freaked out China and the European Union by their erratic behavior. When they see a U.S. president just ignore a trade agreement with Mexico and Canada -- the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement -- that he himself negotiated, they ask themselves: How can we trust any deal we cut with him? This could drive China and the EU closer together. I hear my fellow Americans say: We just have to get to the midterms and have the Democrats regain the House, and we will be OK. Sorry, folks, we cannot wait that long. Another 20 months or so of this erratic leadership, and our country will be irredeemably broken. We need a handful of Republicans in the House and the Senate -- right now -- to cross the aisle and put a stop to this devastating man-made economic disaster.
Share
Share
Copy Link
China's advanced manufacturing capabilities, boosted by AI integration, are reshaping global trade dynamics. Trump's tariff strategy is criticized as counterproductive, potentially driving China and the EU closer together.
China has undergone a significant transformation in its manufacturing capabilities, largely unnoticed by the West due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The country now controls one-third of global manufacturing, up from just 6% in 2000
1
2
. This surge is not just about quantity; Chinese products are now "cheaper, faster, better and smarter," with artificial intelligence (AI) integration poised to supercharge this trend further1
2
.China's manufacturing prowess is set to be dramatically enhanced by its rapid integration of AI into production processes. This technological leap is part of a broader strategy that includes massive government investments in education, infrastructure, and research
1
2
. The result is a manufacturing engine of unprecedented scale and efficiency, capable of producing a wide range of products from cars to robots to phones.Recent data from China's central bank reveals that state-controlled banks lent an additional $1.9 trillion to industrial borrowers over the past four years
1
2
. This influx of capital has fueled the construction of new factories and the upgrading of existing ones with robots and automation. The resulting wave of exports threatens to cause factory closings and layoffs not just in the United States but globally1
2
.President Trump's strategy of imposing tariffs on a global scale is criticized as counterproductive. Instead of targeting the whole world, the argument is made for a united front of industrial democracies led by America to address China's manufacturing dominance
1
2
. This approach aims to compel China to redirect its energies inward, investing in its social safety net and healthcare system while stimulating domestic demand.The article suggests that a more effective strategy would involve negotiating with China to build factories in places like Hamtramck, Michigan, rather than in countries like Vietnam. This would include transferring technologies and supply chains through 50-50 joint ventures
1
2
. However, the current administration's approach, characterized by erratic behavior and alienation of allies, is seen as squandering the leverage needed to deal effectively with China's industrial might.Related Stories
The unpredictable nature of the current U.S. administration, exemplified by disregarding trade agreements like the USMCA, has raised concerns among both China and the European Union about the reliability of deals with the United States
1
2
. This uncertainty could potentially drive China and the EU closer together, further complicating the global trade landscape.The article concludes with a plea for immediate bipartisan action. It argues that waiting for the next election cycle could be too late, potentially causing irreparable damage to the U.S. economy. The author calls for Republicans in the House and Senate to cross the aisle and work towards stopping what is described as a "devastating man-made economic disaster"
1
2
.Summarized by
Navi
[1]
[2]
06 May 2025•Technology
05 Apr 2025•Technology
17 Jul 2025•Policy and Regulation
1
Business and Economy
2
Business and Economy
3
Policy and Regulation