Slotkin introduces bill to limit Pentagon AI use after Anthropic split costs millions

3 Sources

Share

Senator Elissa Slotkin introduced the AI Guardrails Act to regulate military AI use, requiring human authorization for autonomous weapons and banning AI-enabled mass surveillance. The five-page bill aims to codify existing Pentagon guidelines into law following the costly split with Anthropic that will require millions in taxpayer dollars to unwind.

Senator Takes Aim at Military AI with New Legislation

Senator Elissa Slotkin, a Michigan Democrat serving on the Armed Services Committee, has introduced AI legislation designed to establish clear boundaries for military AI use by the Pentagon

1

. The AI Guardrails Act, introduced Tuesday, seeks to codify existing Department of Defense guidelines into enforceable law, addressing three critical areas where human oversight must remain non-negotiable

2

.

Source: The Hill

Source: The Hill

The five-page bill prohibits the Defense Department from using autonomous weapons to kill without human authorization, bans AI-enabled mass surveillance on Americans, and ensures human control over nuclear weapons launches

3

. "Congress is behind in putting left and right limits on the use of AI, and the first place to start should be at the Pentagon," Slotkin said, emphasizing that some military command decisions are "too risky and too consequential for machines to decide"

2

.

Anthropic Dispute Highlights Legislative Gap

The Elissa Slotkin bill emerges directly from the Pentagon's acrimonious split with AI giant Anthropic, a conflict that exposed vulnerabilities in relying solely on administrative guidelines rather than statutory guardrails

1

. While the Pentagon insisted it already regarded conducting mass surveillance of Americans as illegal and maintained policies requiring human responsibility for lethal decisions, Anthropic worried that loopholes could enable surveillance and that future administrations could revoke those guidelines

1

.

The dispute escalated when President Donald Trump decreed that all federal agencies have six months to stop using Anthropic, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth declared the company a supply chain risk—despite the technology helping the U.S. identify military targets in its ongoing conflict with Iran

1

. Anthropic has since sued over that designation

3

.

Source: CBS

Source: CBS

"The Pentagon was able to target Anthropic in this case, and is going to spend the next year and God knows how many millions of dollars ripping out Anthropic from all the classified systems, something that's going to cost the taxpayer an enormous amount of money over a dispute that could have been handled if we just had law," Slotkin told NBC News

1

.

Balancing National Security and AI Competition with China

Slotkin's approach to limit Defense Department's use of AI attempts to thread a delicate needle between establishing necessary restrictions and maintaining competitive advantage. "AI is going to shape the future of America's national security, and we must win the AI race against China. But to do that, we need action that puts limits on AI in the Department of Defense. This is just common sense," the senator stated

2

.

Source: NBC

Source: NBC

The legislation aligns with the Trump administration's AI Action Plan, which calls on the U.S. to "aggresively adopt" AI in military operations while ensuring it remains "secure and reliable"

3

. Slotkin deliberately kept the bill concise at five pages, "because we understand that, like with every tool ever invented, there are some really good uses that help, and there are some really dangerous uses"

1

.

Congressional Momentum and Future Implications

The bill represents the opening move in what is likely to become broader Congressional action on AI in military operations. Introduced without cosponsors, Slotkin aims to shape early conversations around the National Defense Authorization Act, the major annual defense spending bill typically legislated toward year's end

1

.

Other Democrats are pursuing parallel efforts. Senator Adam Schiff of California told The Hill he would introduce legislation in coming weeks to codify protections around AI use in surveillance and warfare, with his office consulting industry leaders and considering inclusion in the upcoming National Defense Authorization Act

3

. In the House, Representative Sam Liccardo introduced an amendment to prohibit federal agencies from retaliating against technology vendors attempting to limit deployment risks to U.S. citizens, though it failed on a party-line vote

3

.

Slotkin's critique of Congress cuts deep: "We're unhealthy as a political system, and so we focus more on things like Greenland than we do on the use of AI in matters of legal force. And it's our responsibility to legislate this"

1

. Whether this legislation gains traction will signal how seriously lawmakers take the challenge of establishing clear rules for military AI before technological capabilities outpace democratic oversight.

Today's Top Stories

TheOutpost.ai

Your Daily Dose of Curated AI News

Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.

© 2026 Triveous Technologies Private Limited
Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo