Anthropic CEO Opposes 10-Year Moratorium on State AI Laws, Sparking Debate on AI Regulation
11 Sources
[1]
In 10 years, all bets are off" -- Anthropic CEO opposes decadelong freeze on state AI laws
On Thursday, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei argued against a proposed 10-year moratorium on state AI regulation in a New York Times opinion piece, calling the measure shortsighted and overbroad as Congress considers including it in President Trump's tax policy bill. Anthropic makes Claude, an AI
[2]
A ban on state AI laws could smash Big Tech's legal guardrails
Lauren Feiner is a senior policy reporter at The Verge, covering the intersection of Silicon Valley and Capitol Hill. She spent 5 years covering tech policy at CNBC, writing about antitrust, privacy, and content moderation reform. Senate Commerce Republicans have kept a ten year moratorium on
[3]
Tax Bill's Bid to Ban New AI Rules Faces Bipartisan Blowback
A Republican attempt to block states from enforcing new artificial intelligence rules over the next decade has drawn growing bipartisan objections, exposing tension in Washington over allowing for more unchecked AI development. The proposal, buried on pages 278 and 279 in the sweeping tax bill
[4]
Congress could ban state AI regulation for a decade. These state lawmakers say 'no way.'
Misinformation, job loss, nonconsensual deepfakes - these are just a few of the issues state lawmakers have to contend with in a world where artificial intelligence becomes more and more prevalent in our daily lives. However, there's one big problem. The federal budget reconciliation bill may make
[5]
Illinois' AI laws are at risk if the U.S. budget bill passes
Why it matters: For many AI skeptics, state laws represent a bulwark against privacy, security and potential discrimination risks as the technology gains rapid acceptance at the federal level by the Trump administration. Zoom in: Since 2024, Illinois has passed at least three AI laws that would be
[6]
Anthropic's CEO has a problem with the GOP's push to stop states from regulating AI
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei is pushing back against Republican efforts to impose a decade-long ban on states regulating artificial intelligence that's included in President Donald Trump's mega-bill. "A 10-year moratorium is far too blunt an instrument. A.I. is advancing too head-spinningly fast,"
[7]
Keller: Artificial intelligence provision in spending bill has unlikely allies lining up to fight it
Jon Keller is the political analyst for WBZ-TV News. His "Keller @ Large" reports on a wide range of topics are regularly featured during WBZ News at 5 and 6 p.m. The opinions expressed below are Jon Keller's, not those of WBZ, CBS News or Paramount Global. The "big, beautiful bill" passed by the
[8]
We need more AI oversight, not less
First, some of the world's leading experts on artificial intelligence believe that artificial general intelligence, machines that can think, reason and adapt to new circumstances as well as humans, could arrive within the next five years. Google co-founder Sergey Brin recently came out of
[9]
Why Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei Is Asking for AI Regulation
In an op-ed in The New York Times, Amodei spoke out against a stipulation in President Donald Trump's One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act that would prevent states from regulating AI for the next 10 years. Amodei wrote that he understood the motivations behind the proposal; if each state regulated AI in
[10]
Anthropic CEO: GOP AI regulation proposal 'too blunt'
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei criticized the latest Republican proposal to regulate artificial intelligence (AI) as "far too blunt an instrument" to mitigate the risks of the rapidly evolving technology. In an op-ed published by The New York Times on Thursday, Amodei said the provision barring states
[11]
Trump's Budget Would Ban States From Regulating AI For 10 Years. Why That Could Be a Problem for Everyday Americans
Marjorie Taylor Green was surprised. After voting in favor of President Trump's budget reconciliation bill, the Republican congresswoman from Georgia was apparently dismayed to learn of an amendment buried deep within the text of what the White House has dubbed the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act of
Share
Copy Link
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei argues against a proposed 10-year moratorium on state AI regulation, calling for federal transparency standards instead. The controversial provision in President Trump's tax policy bill faces bipartisan opposition from lawmakers and civil society groups.
Anthropic CEO Challenges Proposed AI Regulation Moratorium
Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, has voiced strong opposition to a proposed 10-year moratorium on state AI regulation in a New York Times opinion piece
1
. The controversial provision, part of President Trump's tax policy bill, has sparked a heated debate among lawmakers, tech companies, and civil society groups.
Source: Inc.
The Moratorium and Its Implications
The proposed moratorium would prevent states from regulating AI for a decade, effectively nullifying existing state laws and preventing new ones
2
. Supporters argue it would prevent a fragmented regulatory landscape that could hinder innovation and America's competitive edge against China3
.However, Amodei warns that AI is advancing too rapidly for such a long freeze. He predicts that AI systems "could change the world, fundamentally, within two years; in 10 years, all bets are off"
1
. This sentiment is echoed by other industry experts and lawmakers who fear the unpredictable nature of AI development4
.Growing Bipartisan Opposition
The provision has faced increasing bipartisan resistance. Republican Representatives like Marjorie Taylor Greene and Senators such as Marsha Blackburn have joined Democrats in opposing the measure
3
. Over 250 state lawmakers from every state have urged Congress to drop the provision, arguing that state and local governments are more nimble in responding to rapidly developing AI technologies2
.
Source: Bloomberg
Civil society groups warn that the broad language of the moratorium could put essential consumer protections at risk. Jonathan Walter of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights stated, "The ban's language on automated decision making is so broad that we really can't be 100 percent certain which state laws it could touch"
2
.Impact on Existing State Laws
If passed, the moratorium could nullify a wide range of state laws, including:
- Accuracy standards for facial recognition in Colorado and Washington
- Data privacy bills across several states
- Social media regulations like New York's "Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation for Kids Act"
- State governments' restrictions on their own use of AI
2
Illinois alone has passed at least three AI laws since 2024 that would be affected
5
.Alternative Proposal: Federal Transparency Standard
Source: The Verge
Instead of a blanket moratorium, Amodei proposes that the White House and Congress create a federal transparency standard
1
. This would require frontier AI developers to publicly disclose their testing policies and safety measures. Companies working on the most capable AI models would need to publish how they test for various risks and what steps they take before release.Amodei argues this approach would codify existing practices at major AI companies while ensuring continued disclosure as technology advances. It could potentially supersede state laws to create a unified framework, addressing concerns about regulatory patchwork while maintaining oversight
1
.Related Stories
Industry Perspectives
While some AI companies like OpenAI have previously advocated for industry regulation, recent focus has shifted towards clearing away rules that could impede competition with China
2
. TechNet, a trade group representing Google, OpenAI, and other tech companies, echoed concerns about the "developing patchwork" of state AI bills, emphasizing the need for a consistent national approach3
.The Path Forward
As the debate continues, the fate of the AI regulation moratorium remains uncertain. Senator Ted Cruz has expressed doubt about whether the provision will survive the reconciliation process
3
. The outcome will significantly impact the future of AI governance in the United States, balancing innovation with the need for responsible development and consumer protection.References
Summarized by
Navi
[1]
[4]
Related Stories
Proposed Moratorium on State AI Regulations Sparks Debate in US Congress
22 May 2025•Policy and Regulation
Republican Push for Federal AI Regulation Moratorium Faces Opposition and Controversy
18 Jun 2025•Policy and Regulation
GOP Proposes 10-Year Ban on State AI Regulation in Budget Bill
13 May 2025•Policy and Regulation
Recent Highlights
1
OpenAI Claims AI Breakthrough on Navier-Stokes Problem, Sparking Math Community Crisis
Science and Research
2
Anthropic's Claude Now Leads 26% of AI Development Work, Company Reveals New Transparency Metrics
Technology
3
OpenAI Reveals AI Models Hiding Mistakes and Taking Unauthorized Actions in 6 New Misalignment Cases
Technology
Recent Highlights
Today's Top Stories
Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Follow topics that matter to you and stay ahead.
