2 Sources
2 Sources
[1]
Trump 'sells out' U.S. national security with Nvidia chip sales to China, Sen. Warren says
President Donald Trump's decision to let Nvidia sell its advanced H200 artificial intelligence chips to China "sells out American national security," Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., said Thursday. Warren, in remarks on the Senate floor, also reiterated her call for Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang to testify before Congress about the agreement, along with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. The Trump administration knows that China gaining access to the chips, which have previously been subject to export restrictions, "poses a serious threat to our technological leadership and national security," Warren said.
[2]
Trump's move on Nvidia, China 'sells out' national security: Elizabeth Warren
Sen. Elizabeth Warren is rebuking President Donald Trump's decision to let Nvidia sell its advanced artificial intelligence chips to China as "selling our national security." Addressing the Senate floor on Thursday, the Massachusetts Democrat condemned the move as posing "a serious threat to our technological leadership and national security." Trump announced earlier this week that American chipmaker Nvidia will be permitted to export the H200, its second-best generation of AI processors, to China. The decision reverses longstanding restrictions aimed at limiting Beijing's access to advanced computing hardware and has drawn intense bipartisan backlash. Under the new framework, the U.S. government will collect roughly 25% of the revenue generated from these sales and require that all shipments go to "approved customers" subject to security reviews by the Commerce Department. This decision came after Trump discussed the plan with Chinese President Xi Jinping, who "responded positively!" the president wrote in a Truth Social post. Nvidia has welcomed the policy adjustment, arguing it supports U.S. jobs, manufacturing, and taxpayers, and that sales will remain tightly regulated, reports Reuters. The company told the outlet that exports to China will still require U.S. government approval and represent only a small fraction of Nvidia's global advanced chip shipments. "America's foreign competitors and the Administration's critics are pushing the same end -- to force massive commercial markets to support and promote foreign competition," the company told Reuters. However, during Thursday's remarks, Warren noted that shortly before Trump announced his decision, The Department of Justice had boasted about cracking down on a "major China-linked AI tech smuggling network." "So why did the President make this bad deal that sells out the American economy and sells out American national security?" she asked. "It's simple: In the Trump administration, money talks." Warren repeated her calls for Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to testify before Congress about the deal and whether it might conflict with enforcement actions taken by the DOJ against the illegal chip-smuggling network. "Alarm bells go off in my head here," Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) told CNBC Tuesday. "I don't mind doing normal business with China. But if you can prove to me this will accelerate their military capability, I'll oppose it." Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo) told reporters that "China's progress on AI is almost entirely parasitic on our technology, in particular on our hardware," adding that "If [we]want to beat China, I think we need to constrain their ability to leverage our own technology. The reaction represents an unusual moment of bipartisan unease over technology exports that policymakers had previously restricted to preserve U.S. competitive advantages. China is reportedly weighing how to respond to the new policy. Sources told the Financial Times that Chinese regulators may still impose their own constraints on H200 access, requiring strict approvals or prioritizing domestic chip development -- an effort to bolster self-sufficiency even as U.S. firms seek entry into the market. Yet, there's reportedly been robust demand from Chinese companies, as Nvidia contemplates boosting production of H200 chips in response, sources told Reuters in a Friday report.
Share
Share
Copy Link
President Trump's decision to allow Nvidia to sell advanced H200 AI chips to China has triggered fierce bipartisan criticism. Sen. Elizabeth Warren accuses the administration of selling out national security for revenue, while Republican senators express alarm over potential military implications. The move reverses longstanding export restrictions and comes just days after DOJ crackdowns on China-linked chip smuggling networks.

President Donald Trump's administration announced this week that American chipmaker Nvidia will be permitted to export advanced H200 AI chips to China, reversing longstanding export restrictions that aimed to limit Beijing's access to cutting-edge computing hardware
1
2
. The H200 represents Nvidia's second-best generation of AI processors, and the decision has ignited intense criticism from lawmakers across the political spectrum who view it as a dangerous compromise of America's technological leadership.Under the new framework outlined in the Trump China policy, the U.S. government will collect roughly 25% of the revenue generated from these sales, with all shipments required to go to "approved customers" subject to security reviews by the Commerce Department
2
. The decision came after Trump discussed the plan with Chinese President Xi Jinping, who "responded positively," according to the president's Truth Social post2
.Sen. Elizabeth Warren delivered sharp criticism from the Senate floor Thursday, declaring that the decision "sells out American national security" and poses "a serious threat to our technological leadership and national security"
1
2
. The Massachusetts Democrat emphasized that the Trump administration knows China gaining access to these chips represents a significant risk, yet proceeded anyway.Warren pointed to troubling timing, noting that shortly before Trump announced his decision, the Department of Justice had publicized its crackdown on a "major China-linked AI tech smuggling network"
2
. The juxtaposition of prosecuting chip smuggling while simultaneously authorizing legal sales raised questions about policy coherence. "So why did the President make this bad deal that sells out the American economy and sells out American national security?" Warren asked. "It's simple: In the Trump administration, money talks"2
.The controversy has generated rare bipartisan concern over technology exports that policymakers had previously restricted to preserve U.S. competitive advantages. Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican, told CNBC that "alarm bells go off in my head here," adding that while he doesn't mind normal business with China, "if you can prove to me this will accelerate their military capability, I'll oppose it"
2
.Sen. Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, expressed similar reservations, stating that "China's progress on AI is almost entirely parasitic on our technology, in particular on our hardware." He argued that "if [we] want to beat China, I think we need to constrain their ability to leverage our own technology"
2
. The statements reflect widespread anxiety about whether easing restrictions on advanced H200 AI chips could enhance China's military AI capabilities.Related Stories
Warren reiterated her demand that Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick testify before Congress about the agreement
1
2
. She wants both officials to address whether the deal might conflict with enforcement actions taken by the DOJ against the illegal chip smuggling network. The request signals lawmakers' intent to scrutinize the decision-making process and assess potential national security implications.Nvidia has defended the policy adjustment, arguing it supports U.S. jobs, manufacturing, and taxpayers while maintaining that sales will remain tightly regulated. The company told Reuters that exports to China will still require U.S. government approval and represent only a small fraction of Nvidia's global advanced chip shipments
2
. "America's foreign competitors and the Administration's critics are pushing the same end -- to force massive commercial markets to support and promote foreign competition," Nvidia stated2
.Chinese companies have reportedly shown robust demand for the H200, prompting Nvidia to contemplate boosting production in response, according to sources who spoke with Reuters
2
. However, China is weighing how to respond to the new policy. Sources told the Financial Times that Chinese regulators may still impose their own constraints on H200 access, requiring strict approvals or prioritizing domestic chip development in an effort to bolster self-sufficiency even as U.S. firms seek entry into the market2
.The situation presents a complex calculus for both nations. While the revenue-sharing arrangement may generate income for the U.S. government, critics argue it compromises long-term strategic advantages. Lawmakers and security experts will be watching whether approved customers can be effectively monitored, how the 25% revenue collection impacts market dynamics, and whether China's domestic chip industry accelerates or decelerates in response to renewed access to American technology.
Summarized by
Navi
05 Dec 2025•Policy and Regulation

29 Jul 2025•Policy and Regulation

30 May 2025•Policy and Regulation

1
Technology

2
Technology

3
Policy and Regulation
