Trump's Nvidia chip deal with China draws bipartisan fire over national security concerns

Reviewed byNidhi Govil

2 Sources

Share

President Trump's decision to allow Nvidia to sell advanced H200 AI chips to China has triggered fierce bipartisan criticism. Sen. Elizabeth Warren accuses the administration of selling out national security for revenue, while Republican senators express alarm over potential military implications. The move reverses longstanding export restrictions and comes just days after DOJ crackdowns on China-linked chip smuggling networks.

News article

Trump Reverses Export Restrictions on Nvidia AI Chips to China

President Donald Trump's administration announced this week that American chipmaker Nvidia will be permitted to export advanced H200 AI chips to China, reversing longstanding export restrictions that aimed to limit Beijing's access to cutting-edge computing hardware

1

2

. The H200 represents Nvidia's second-best generation of AI processors, and the decision has ignited intense criticism from lawmakers across the political spectrum who view it as a dangerous compromise of America's technological leadership.

Under the new framework outlined in the Trump China policy, the U.S. government will collect roughly 25% of the revenue generated from these sales, with all shipments required to go to "approved customers" subject to security reviews by the Commerce Department

2

. The decision came after Trump discussed the plan with Chinese President Xi Jinping, who "responded positively," according to the president's Truth Social post

2

.

Warren Accuses Administration of Selling Out National Security

Sen. Elizabeth Warren delivered sharp criticism from the Senate floor Thursday, declaring that the decision "sells out American national security" and poses "a serious threat to our technological leadership and national security"

1

2

. The Massachusetts Democrat emphasized that the Trump administration knows China gaining access to these chips represents a significant risk, yet proceeded anyway.

Warren pointed to troubling timing, noting that shortly before Trump announced his decision, the Department of Justice had publicized its crackdown on a "major China-linked AI tech smuggling network"

2

. The juxtaposition of prosecuting chip smuggling while simultaneously authorizing legal sales raised questions about policy coherence. "So why did the President make this bad deal that sells out the American economy and sells out American national security?" Warren asked. "It's simple: In the Trump administration, money talks"

2

.

Bipartisan Concern Emerges Over China's Military AI Capabilities

The controversy has generated rare bipartisan concern over technology exports that policymakers had previously restricted to preserve U.S. competitive advantages. Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican, told CNBC that "alarm bells go off in my head here," adding that while he doesn't mind normal business with China, "if you can prove to me this will accelerate their military capability, I'll oppose it"

2

.

Sen. Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, expressed similar reservations, stating that "China's progress on AI is almost entirely parasitic on our technology, in particular on our hardware." He argued that "if [we] want to beat China, I think we need to constrain their ability to leverage our own technology"

2

. The statements reflect widespread anxiety about whether easing restrictions on advanced H200 AI chips could enhance China's military AI capabilities.

Calls for Huang and Lutnick to Testify Before Congress

Warren reiterated her demand that Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick testify before Congress about the agreement

1

2

. She wants both officials to address whether the deal might conflict with enforcement actions taken by the DOJ against the illegal chip smuggling network. The request signals lawmakers' intent to scrutinize the decision-making process and assess potential national security implications.

Nvidia has defended the policy adjustment, arguing it supports U.S. jobs, manufacturing, and taxpayers while maintaining that sales will remain tightly regulated. The company told Reuters that exports to China will still require U.S. government approval and represent only a small fraction of Nvidia's global advanced chip shipments

2

. "America's foreign competitors and the Administration's critics are pushing the same end -- to force massive commercial markets to support and promote foreign competition," Nvidia stated

2

.

Market Response and China's Strategic Calculations

Chinese companies have reportedly shown robust demand for the H200, prompting Nvidia to contemplate boosting production in response, according to sources who spoke with Reuters

2

. However, China is weighing how to respond to the new policy. Sources told the Financial Times that Chinese regulators may still impose their own constraints on H200 access, requiring strict approvals or prioritizing domestic chip development in an effort to bolster self-sufficiency even as U.S. firms seek entry into the market

2

.

The situation presents a complex calculus for both nations. While the revenue-sharing arrangement may generate income for the U.S. government, critics argue it compromises long-term strategic advantages. Lawmakers and security experts will be watching whether approved customers can be effectively monitored, how the 25% revenue collection impacts market dynamics, and whether China's domestic chip industry accelerates or decelerates in response to renewed access to American technology.

Today's Top Stories

TheOutpost.ai

Your Daily Dose of Curated AI News

Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.

© 2025 Triveous Technologies Private Limited
Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo