3 Sources
3 Sources
[1]
Thousands of authors publish 'empty' book in protest over AI using their work
About 10,000 writers including Kazuo Ishiguro, Philippa Gregory and Richard Osman join copyright campaign Thousands of authors including Kazuo Ishiguro, Philippa Gregory and Richard Osman have published an "empty" book to protest against AI firms using their work without permission. About 10,000 writers have contributed to Don't Steal This Book, in which the only content is a list of their names. Copies of the work are being distributed to attenders at the London book fair on Tuesday, a week before the UK government is due to issue an assessment on the economic cost of proposed changes in copyright law. By 18 March ministers must deliver an economic impact assessment as well as a progress update on a consultation about the legal overhaul, against a backdrop of anger among creative professionals about how their work is being used by AI firms. The organiser of the book, Ed Newton-Rex, a composer and campaigner for protecting artists' copyright, said the AI industry was "built on stolen work ... taken without permission or payment". He added: "This is not a victimless crime - generative AI competes with the people whose work it is trained on, robbing them of their livelihoods. The government must protect the UK's creatives, and refuse to legalise the theft of creative work by AI companies." Other authors who have contributed their names to the book include the Slow Horses author, Mick Herron; the author Marian Keyes; the historian David Olusoga; and Malorie Blackman, the writer of Noughts and Crosses. "It is not in any way unreasonable to expect AI companies to pay for the use of authors' books," said Blackman. The books's back cover says: "The UK government must not legalise book theft to benefit AI companies." Publishers will also launch an AI licensing initiative at the London book fair. Publishers' Licensing Services, a non-profit industry body, is setting up a collective licensing scheme and has invited the sector to sign up to it in the expectation it will give legal access to published works. AI requires vast amounts of data, including copyright-protected work taken from the open web, to develop tools such as chatbots and image generators. This has caused consternation among creative professionals and companies worldwide, triggering lawsuits on both sides of the Atlantic. Last year Anthropic, a leading AI firm and the developer of the Claude chatbot, agreed to pay $1.5bn (£1.1bn) to settle a class-action lawsuit by book authors who said the startup took pirated copies of their works to train its flagship product. British artists have responded with outrage at the main government proposal in the consultation. It proposes letting AI firms use copyright-protected work without the owner's permission - unless the owner has signalled that they want to opt out of the process. Elton John is among the artists to have protested over the prospect of a relaxation in copyright law, calling the government "absolute losers". As well as the main government proposal, ministers have suggested three further options: to leave the situation unchanged; to require AI companies to seek licences for using copyrighted work; or to allow AI firms to use copyrighted work with no opt-out for creative companies and individuals. The government has also refused to rule out a copyright waiver for using material for the purposes of "commercial research", which creative professionals fear could be exploited by AI firms to take artists' work without permission. A government spokesperson said: "The government wants a copyright regime that values and protects human creativity, can be trusted, and unlocks innovation. We will continue to engage closely with the creative sector on this issue, and we will meet our commitment to update parliament by March 18th."
[2]
Authors protest AI at London Book Fair with 'empty' book
Thousands of authors feature in a new "empty" book titled "Don't Steal This Book" - a protest over AI firms using creative professionals' work without their permission. "The UK government must not legalise book theft to benefit AI companies," reads the back cover of a new book being distributed at this year's London Book Fair. A treatise on the existential threat that artificial intelligence represents for writers? A compendium of artists' experiences as they face an uncertain future? In many ways, yes: it's an "empty" book in which the only content is a list of the names of thousands of authors, who have published "Don't Steal This Book" as a way to protest against AI firms using their work without their permission. Among the illustrious names are Kazuo Ishiguro, Richard Osman, Alan Moore, Marian Keyes, Malorie Blackman, Philippa Gregory and Mick Herron. You can read the full list of authors involved on dontstealthisbook.com. The website states: "AI companies are building their products by copying millions of books without permission or payment. The UK government is considering legalising this large-scale theft. We urge them to rule this out. AI companies should pay for books, like everyone else." The statement adds: "If they don't, this is what we'll be left with: empty pages, writers without pay, and readers deprived of the next book they'll love." The organiser of the book, Ed Newton-Rex, a composer and campaigner for protecting artists' copyright, told the Guardian that the AI industry was "built on stolen work ... taken without permission or payment". "This is not a victimless crime - generative AI competes with the people whose work it is trained on, robbing them of their livelihoods," said Newton-Rex. "The government must protect the UK's creatives, and refuse to legalise the theft of creative work by AI companies." The distribution of "Don't Steal This Book" comes just one week before the UK government is due to issue an assessment on the economic cost of proposed changes in copyright law. The Guardian notes that British artists have responded with outrage at the main government proposal in the consultation, which proposes letting AI firms use copyright-protected work without the owner's permission - unless the owner has signalled that they want to opt out. UK ministers must deliver an economic impact assessment by 18 March, as well as a progress update on a consultation about the legal overhaul.
[3]
Thousands of authors publish "empty" book in protest over AI and copyright
Around 10,000 writers have published an "empty" book to protest against artificial intelligence companies using their work without permission or payment. The book, titled Don't Steal This Book, contains only a list of contributors' names and is being distributed at the London Book Fair. Among the authors supporting the campaign are Kazuo Ishiguro, Philippa Gregory and Richard Osman. The initiative was organised by composer and campaigner Ed Newton-Rex, who argues that AI companies are training their models on copyrighted material without consent. The protest comes as the UK government prepares to publish an assessment of proposed copyright law changes affecting AI development. Creative professionals have raised concerns that new rules could allow AI firms to use copyrighted work unless authors explicitly opt out, a proposal that has triggered strong opposition across the publishing and arts industries.
Share
Share
Copy Link
Around 10,000 writers including Kazuo Ishiguro, Philippa Gregory, and Richard Osman have published Don't Steal This Book, containing only their names, to protest AI firms training on copyrighted material without permission or payment. The empty book protest arrives at the London Book Fair as the UK government prepares its assessment on proposed copyright law changes that could legalize AI companies using creative work under an opt-out system.
Around 10,000 writers have launched an unprecedented authors protest against AI companies using copyrighted work without permission or payment
1
. The protest centers on Don't Steal This Book, an intentionally empty book containing only a list of contributor names, distributed at the London Book Fair this week2
. Among the prominent authors are Nobel laureate Kazuo Ishiguro, bestselling novelist Philippa Gregory, Richard Osman, Slow Horses author Mick Herron, Noughts and Crosses writer Malorie Blackman, historian David Olusoga, and novelist Marian Keyes1
.
Source: GameReactor
The empty book protest carries a stark message on its back cover: "The UK government must not legalise book theft to benefit AI companies"
2
. The initiative was organized by Ed Newton-Rex, a composer and campaigner for protecting artists' copyright, who argues that the AI industry is "built on stolen work ... taken without permission or payment"1
. Newton-Rex emphasized that "this is not a victimless crime - generative AI competes with the people whose work it is trained on, robbing them of their livelihoods"2
.The timing of this protest is strategic. The UK government assessment on proposed changes to copyright law is due by March 18, just one week after the London Book Fair distribution
1
. Ministers must deliver both an economic impact assessment and a progress update on a consultation about the legal overhaul, against a backdrop of mounting anger among creative professionals about how AI firms are using their work1
.
Source: Euronews
The main government proposal has triggered particular outrage across creative industries. It would allow AI companies using copyrighted work without the owner's permission unless the owner explicitly signals they want to opt out of the process
1
. This opt-out system has drawn fierce opposition from artists and writers who argue it fundamentally reverses the burden of protecting intellectual property. Elton John has been among the high-profile critics, calling the government "absolute losers" over the prospect of relaxed copyright law1
.Beyond the controversial opt-out proposal, ministers have suggested three additional options: leaving the situation unchanged, requiring AI companies to seek licenses for using copyrighted material, or allowing AI firms to use copyrighted work with no opt-out for creative companies and individuals
1
. The government has also refused to rule out a copyright waiver for using material for "commercial research" purposes, which creative professionals fear could be exploited by AI models to take artists' work without permission1
.Malorie Blackman stated plainly: "It is not in any way unreasonable to expect AI companies to pay for the use of authors' books"
1
. The dontstealthisbook.com website warns: "If they don't, this is what we'll be left with: empty pages, writers without pay, and readers deprived of the next book they'll love"2
.Related Stories
Alongside the protest, publishers are launching their own solution. Publishers' Licensing Services, a non-profit industry body, is establishing a collective licensing initiative at the London Book Fair
1
. The scheme invites the sector to sign up in the expectation it will provide legal access to published works for AI training, potentially offering a middle ground between unrestricted use and complete prohibition.The tension reflects a global struggle over how AI should access training data. AI requires vast amounts of data, including copyright-protected work taken from the open web, to develop tools such as chatbots and image generators
1
. This has triggered lawsuits on both sides of the Atlantic. Last year, Anthropic, developer of the Claude chatbot, agreed to pay $1.5bn to settle a class-action lawsuit by book authors who said the startup took pirated copies of their works to train its flagship product1
.A government spokesperson responded: "The government wants a copyright regime that values and protects human creativity, can be trusted, and unlocks innovation. We will continue to engage closely with the creative sector on this issue, and we will meet our commitment to update parliament by March 18th"
1
. The March 18 deadline will be closely watched by authors, publishers, and AI companies alike as it could reshape how AI development intersects with book theft concerns and the protection of creative work for years to come.Summarized by
Navi
15 Jan 2025•Policy and Regulation

29 Jun 2025•Technology

25 Feb 2025•Policy and Regulation

1
Technology

2
Technology

3
Business and Economy
