12 Sources
[1]
AI can't help real artists reach their full potential | Letters
Proposed changes to copyright law would deny what makes us human, says Helen Ward. Plus letters from Jason Mills and Daniel Heuman Your article (Kate Bush and Damon Albarn among 1,000 artists on silent AI protest album, 25 February) quotes a government spokesperson: "As it stands, the UK's current
[2]
Help is coming in the AI copyright wars
As you might expect, the protests have been creative, even quirky. More than 1,000 artists, including Annie Lennox and Kate Bush, supported the release this week of a silent album containing nothing more than background studio noise. The 47-minute album called Is This What We Want? contains 12
[3]
AI companies committing 'largest copyright heist in world's history'
"But a strong copyright regime is absolutely vital if the Government wants to achieve its growth goals, and that goes for absolutely everyone." Dame Caroline's comments come as she joined forces with Chi Onwurah, the chairman of the science, innovation and technology committee, to urge Ms Nandy
[4]
The Guardian view on AI and copyright: creativity should be cherished, not given away | Editorial
It's a seductive promise: let our computers scrape the internet for ideas, images, forms of words, stories, music, jokes ... and our industry will make your country rich. For a UK government desperate for economic growth, the demands of tech companies for copyright laws to be relaxed - in order
[5]
It's grand theft AI and UK ministers are behind it. Oppose this robbery of people's creativity | Andrew Lloyd Webber and Alastair Webber
The plan to weaken copyright law, allowing tech firms to profit for free from people's talent, is an outrage, and the nation would suffer We are father and son: one has written 16 musicals and counting, the other cofounded The Other Songs, a leading independent record and publishing company. Our
[6]
We must make AI fair - failure could scupper creative life
But perhaps the biggest shout out goes to the hundreds of individuals who have written to me to thank me for my amendments to the Data Uses and (Access) Bill. Amendments that would solve the Government's stated problem of making copyright fit for the age of AI. And now, a little slower to react,
[7]
Prioritise artists over tech in AI copyright debate, MPs say
Cross-party committees urge ministers to drop plans to force creators to opt out of works being used to train AI Two cross-party committees of MPs have urged the government to prioritise ensuring that creators are fairly remunerated for their creative work over making it easy to train AI
[8]
Make It Fair
The imagination of the UK's creative industries powers the British economy and shapes how the rest of the world sees us as a nation. The creative works of British artists, authors, journalists, illustrators, photographers, film-makers, scriptwriters, singers and songwriters are being scraped from
[9]
UK creative industries launch 'Make it Fair' campaign against AI content theft
British creatives band together to urge for stronger copyright law Artificial intelligence and Large Language Models are trained on hoards of online information, including songs, articles, comments, books, drawings, pictures, and more - so if you've ever commented on an Instagram post, posted a
[10]
How UK's AI Copyright Changes Could Impact the Music Industry
Disclaimer: This content generated by AI & may have errors or hallucinations. Edit before use. Read our Terms of use More than 1,000 musicians have released a silent album protesting the UK government's proposed changes to the copyright laws, allowing companies to train their AI models on
[11]
Make it fAIr - why human intelligence must prevail in the ongoing AI-driven assault on creativity and copyright
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the transformative technology of the day. Popularized by Large Language Models and generative tools in the cloud, AI promises many things. Among these are the potential to help doctors, researchers, and pharma companies to not only find cures for diseases such as
[12]
UK newspapers blanket their covers to protest loss of AI protections
Creative and media industries have teamed up on this "Make It Fair" initiative, calling for readers to help protect British creative industries. The campaign was created to fight government proposals that would allow artificial intelligence companies to train their models on copyright-protected
Share
Copy Link
The UK government's proposed changes to copyright law for AI have ignited a fierce debate between tech companies and creative industries, raising concerns about intellectual property rights and the future of human creativity.

The UK government's proposed changes to copyright law for artificial intelligence (AI) have ignited a fierce debate between tech companies and creative industries. The government is considering relaxing copyright restrictions to allow AI companies to use copyrighted material for training their models without seeking permission or providing compensation
1
2
.Over 1,000 artists, including Kate Bush and Annie Lennox, have joined a silent protest album titled "Is This What We Want?" to express their opposition to the proposed changes
2
. The creative sector argues that these changes would amount to intellectual property theft and pose an existential threat to the UK's creative industries3
.The UK government claims that the current copyright regime is holding back the creative industries, media, and AI sectors from realizing their full potential
1
. They aim to position the UK as an AI-friendly powerhouse, following the US and China2
. However, critics argue that this approach could impoverish creatives to accommodate big tech's latest developments1
.The creative industries contributed £124 billion in gross added value to the UK economy in 2023, accounting for about 5% of the total
2
. Dame Caroline Dinenage, chair of the culture, media and sport committee, has described the situation as "the largest copyright heist in world's history"3
. There are concerns that the proposed changes could undermine the foundations of the UK's leadership in culture and creativity3
.Some startups are experimenting with new economic models to address the issue. Companies like ProRata.ai, TollBit, and Human Native.ai are developing platforms to enable fair compensation for content creators when their work is used by AI companies
2
. Additionally, some creative businesses are already striking individual content licensing deals with AI companies2
.Related Stories
In the House of Lords, an amendment to the government's data bill has been accepted, asserting that licenses to copyrighted material must be actively sought rather than taken for granted
4
. Beeban Kidron's amendments to the bill would introduce safeguards to ensure AI firms seek permission and pay for the content they use5
.The UK introduced the world's first copyright law, the Statute of Anne, in 1710, setting the global standard for protecting creators
5
. The current debate is seen as a potential dismantling of these long-standing protections. The US and EU are also grappling with similar issues, with some countries implementing transparency requirements for AI training data3
.As the consultation on AI and copyright law concludes, the UK government faces a critical decision that will shape the future of both the creative and tech industries. The outcome of this debate could have far-reaching consequences for intellectual property rights, human creativity, and the economic landscape of the United Kingdom.
Summarized by
Navi
[1]
[3]
[4]
15 Jan 2025•Policy and Regulation

20 May 2025•Policy and Regulation

22 Feb 2025•Policy and Regulation

1
Science and Research

2
Technology
3
Technology