3 Sources
3 Sources
[1]
In AI-simulated Fed meeting, political pressure polarises board
TOKYO, Sept 11 (Reuters) - A simulated Federal Reserve meeting that used artificial intelligence agents modeled on real-life policymakers showed political pressure polarised members of the board in their rate-setting deliberations. In the study released on August 31, academics at George Washington University simulated a Federal Open Market Committee meeting using AI agents modeled by each member based on their historical policy stances, biographies and speeches. The AI FOMC was then made to process real-time economic data and financial news to reach a decision. The findings showed when political pressure is applied, the AI agents became fragmented and dissent more common, according to the paper by Sophia Kazinnik and Tara Sinclair. "This simulation shows that the Federal Reserve is only partially insulated from politics," and that "outside scrutiny can shape internal decision-making, even in an institution guided by formal rules," they said in the paper. The simulation replicates the July 2025 FOMC meeting. While few central banks may be ready to have AI agents set monetary policy, a growing number of them are using the technology to streamline operations. The Fed conducted research using generative AI models to analyse minutes of the FOMC meetings. The European Central Bank uses machine learning models to forecast euro-area inflation. The Bank of Japan uses AI to gather information and deepen economic analyses. Research it published in December used large language models (LLM) to show how key factors driving up prices may be shifting to labour costs from raw material prices. Australia's central bank is testing a new AI tool that gives summaries on policy-related analytical questions, its governor Michele Bullock said on September 3. "To be clear, we are not using AI to formulate or set monetary policy or any other policy," she said. "Instead, we are looking to leverage it to improve efficiency and amplify the impact of staff efforts in areas such as research and analysis." Central banks see strategic importance in AI and are actively experimenting on data retrieval and analyses, the Bank for International Settlements said in a report in April. "Yet, below the surface, many central banks are still in the initial adoption phase," given the need to ensure the technology is used with adequate governance and high-quality data, it said. Reporting by Leika Kihara; Editing by Sam Holmes Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
[2]
In AI-Simulated Fed Meeting, Political Pressure Polarises Board
TOKYO (Reuters) -A simulated Federal Reserve meeting that used artificial intelligence agents modeled on real-life policymakers showed political pressure polarised members of the board in their rate-setting deliberations. In the study released on August 31, academics at George Washington University simulated a Federal Open Market Committee meeting using AI agents modeled by each member based on their historical policy stances, biographies and speeches. The AI FOMC was then made to process real-time economic data and financial news to reach a decision. The findings showed when political pressure is applied, the AI agents became fragmented and dissent more common, according to the paper by Sophia Kazinnik and Tara Sinclair. "This simulation shows that the Federal Reserve is only partially insulated from politics," and that "outside scrutiny can shape internal decision-making, even in an institution guided by formal rules," they said in the paper. The simulation replicates the July 2025 FOMC meeting. While few central banks may be ready to have AI agents set monetary policy, a growing number of them are using the technology to streamline operations. The Fed conducted research using generative AI models to analyse minutes of the FOMC meetings. The European Central Bank uses machine learning models to forecast euro-area inflation. The Bank of Japan uses AI to gather information and deepen economic analyses. Research it published in December used large language models (LLM) to show how key factors driving up prices may be shifting to labour costs from raw material prices. Australia's central bank is testing a new AI tool that gives summaries on policy-related analytical questions, its governor Michele Bullock said on September 3. "To be clear, we are not using AI to formulate or set monetary policy or any other policy," she said. "Instead, we are looking to leverage it to improve efficiency and amplify the impact of staff efforts in areas such as research and analysis." Central banks see strategic importance in AI and are actively experimenting on data retrieval and analyses, the Bank for International Settlements said in a report in April. "Yet, below the surface, many central banks are still in the initial adoption phase," given the need to ensure the technology is used with adequate governance and high-quality data, it said. (Reporting by Leika Kihara; Editing by Sam Holmes)
[3]
In AI-simulated Fed meeting, political pressure polarises board
TOKYO (Reuters) -A simulated Federal Reserve meeting that used artificial intelligence agents modeled on real-life policymakers showed political pressure polarised members of the board in their rate-setting deliberations. In the study released on August 31, academics at George Washington University simulated a Federal Open Market Committee meeting using AI agents modeled by each member based on their historical policy stances, biographies and speeches. The AI FOMC was then made to process real-time economic data and financial news to reach a decision. The findings showed when political pressure is applied, the AI agents became fragmented and dissent more common, according to the paper by Sophia Kazinnik and Tara Sinclair. "This simulation shows that the Federal Reserve is only partially insulated from politics," and that "outside scrutiny can shape internal decision-making, even in an institution guided by formal rules," they said in the paper. The simulation replicates the July 2025 FOMC meeting. While few central banks may be ready to have AI agents set monetary policy, a growing number of them are using the technology to streamline operations. The Fed conducted research using generative AI models to analyse minutes of the FOMC meetings. The European Central Bank uses machine learning models to forecast euro-area inflation. The Bank of Japan uses AI to gather information and deepen economic analyses. Research it published in December used large language models (LLM) to show how key factors driving up prices may be shifting to labour costs from raw material prices. Australia's central bank is testing a new AI tool that gives summaries on policy-related analytical questions, its governor Michele Bullock said on September 3. "To be clear, we are not using AI to formulate or set monetary policy or any other policy," she said. "Instead, we are looking to leverage it to improve efficiency and amplify the impact of staff efforts in areas such as research and analysis." Central banks see strategic importance in AI and are actively experimenting on data retrieval and analyses, the Bank for International Settlements said in a report in April. "Yet, below the surface, many central banks are still in the initial adoption phase," given the need to ensure the technology is used with adequate governance and high-quality data, it said.
Share
Share
Copy Link
A study using AI-simulated Federal Reserve meetings shows that political pressure can polarize board members in their rate-setting deliberations. The research highlights the growing use of AI in central banking operations and analysis.
A groundbreaking study by academics at George Washington University has shed light on the potential impact of political pressure on Federal Reserve decision-making. The research, released on August 31, utilized artificial intelligence (AI) agents modeled after real-life policymakers to simulate a Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting
1
.Source: Reuters
The AI-powered simulation, which replicated the July 2025 FOMC meeting, processed real-time economic data and financial news to reach policy decisions. Notably, the study revealed that when subjected to political pressure, the AI agents representing FOMC members became more fragmented, with dissent becoming increasingly common
2
.According to researchers Sophia Kazinnik and Tara Sinclair, "This simulation shows that the Federal Reserve is only partially insulated from politics," and that "outside scrutiny can shape internal decision-making, even in an institution guided by formal rules"
3
.While the idea of AI agents setting monetary policy may seem far-fetched, the study highlights a growing trend of central banks leveraging AI technology to enhance their operations and analysis capabilities.
The Federal Reserve has conducted research using generative AI models to analyze FOMC meeting minutes, while the European Central Bank employs machine learning models for euro-area inflation forecasting
1
.The Bank of Japan has also embraced AI for information gathering and economic analysis. A recent study published in December utilized large language models (LLM) to identify shifting factors driving price increases, suggesting a transition from raw material prices to labor costs
2
.Related Stories
Despite the potential benefits, central banks are proceeding cautiously with AI adoption. Australia's central bank, for instance, is testing an AI tool that provides summaries on policy-related analytical questions. Governor Michele Bullock emphasized, "To be clear, we are not using AI to formulate or set monetary policy or any other policy," but rather to "improve efficiency and amplify the impact of staff efforts in areas such as research and analysis"
1
.The Bank for International Settlements reported in April that while central banks recognize the strategic importance of AI and are actively experimenting with data retrieval and analysis applications, many are still in the initial adoption phase. This cautious approach stems from the need to ensure proper governance and high-quality data usage in AI implementations
3
.Summarized by
Navi
[2]
[3]
22 Feb 2025β’Business and Economy
10 Apr 2025β’Business and Economy
20 Sept 2024
1
Business and Economy
2
Business and Economy
3
Policy and Regulation