Fed Rate Cuts: Not a Panacea for Sluggish US Job Market

Why Fed rate cuts are no magic fix for anemic hiring in US

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell signaled a shift from inflation to employment, suggesting the Fed does not seek further cooling in the labour market. However, a slow hiring environment is expected to persist into next year. Factors impacting hiring include corporate cost management and sector-specific revenue pressures.Chair Jerome Powell cemented a shift in focus from inflation to employment last week when he said that the Federal Reserve does not seek a further cooling in the labor market. It was a welcome message for those concerned about an economic slowdown. But there are reasons to expect today's sluggish hiring environment to persist at least into early next year, frustrating job seekers and policymakers alike. We are in a "low hiring, low firing" labor market regime. The Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey showed that June was the weakest month for hiring in a decade if you exclude the early phase of the pandemic. Many employers have avoided layoffs by managing costs via attrition and headcount freezes, anticipating a turnaround once the Fed starts cutting interest rates (as I noted here). At the same time, the unemployment rate has climbed as immigration and greater participation among native-born American workers swelled the labor force. Powell's speech at the Jackson Hole conference makes it less likely that we'll see layoffs pick up, but, consistent with prior policy easing cycles, the "low hiring" part of the current regime may well persist too, posing a conundrum for Fed officials as they seek to stabilize the labor market. Across corporate America, a disinflationary impulse is putting pressure on revenue growth, making it difficult to hire workers while maintaining profit margins. This is especially true for the discretionary goods sector where sell side analysts have been cutting their estimates of revenue growth for coming quarters, according to Bloomberg Intelligence. The Consumer Price Index shows that in core goods -- categories including home furnishings, clothing and automobiles -- prices on a year-over-year basis are falling faster than they have in 20 years. That's good news for consumers, but bad news for sellers of those products. For the housing industry, the Fed's rate cuts will come too late, as I wrote earlier this month. A weaker-than-expected peak selling season this spring meant companies tied to housing have pushed out expectations for a recovery until next year. They're unlikely to increase hiring until there's more evidence that buyers are responding to lower mortgage rates. The technology sector seems to be going through something akin to a jobless recovery despite the boom in investments related to artificial intelligence. Google parent Alphabet Inc.'s headcount has fallen slightly over the past year while capital expenditures surged 85%. Meta Platforms Inc., another big AI spender, has resumed net hiring over the past few quarters but at a much slower pace than in the 2010s. AI requires heavy spending on chips, servers and data centers but, for the moment, doesn't seem to need many people. The experience of 2002 also shows that even a meaningful pickup in economic activity and interest rate-sensitive industries next year won't guarantee an increase in hiring. Back then, the economy had exited recession, consumption growth was solid, residential property investment contributed 0.3% to real gross domestic product growth, and homebuilder confidence increased, but the overall hiring rate was flat. It took until the latter half of 2003 -- almost two years after the end of the 2001 recession -- for hiring to increase and for the unemployment rate to begin to decline. The tension in the labor market right now is that overall momentum is negative -- as seen in declining job openings and the hires rate and rising unemployment -- even though some measures such as jobless claims and layoffs continue to be low and stable. The Fed has enough room to cut interest rates and should be able to reverse that negative momentum eventually. Yet the prospects for a pickup in hiring over the next couple of quarters appear dim. Richmond Fed President Thomas Barkin speculated on Bloomberg's Odd Lots podcast recently that the current dynamic of low hiring and low firing is unsustainable. Until this stalemate is resolved with companies willing to increase headcount, the labor market isn't out of the woods.

Why Fed rate cuts are no magic fix for anemic hiring in US

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell signaled a shift from inflation to employment, suggesting the Fed does not seek further cooling in the labour market. However, a slow hiring environment is expected to persist into next year. Factors impacting hiring include corporate cost management and sector-specific revenue pressures. Chair Jerome Powell cemented a shift in focus from inflation to employment last week when he said that the Federal Reserve does not seek a further cooling in the labor market. It was a welcome message for those concerned about an economic slowdown. But there are reasons to expect today's sluggish hiring environment to persist at least into early next year, frustrating job seekers and policymakers alike. We are in a "low hiring, low firing" labor market regime. The Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey showed that June was the weakest month for hiring in a decade if you exclude the early phase of the pandemic. Many employers have avoided layoffs by managing costs via attrition and headcount freezes, anticipating a turnaround once the Fed starts cutting interest rates (as I noted here). At the same time, the unemployment rate has climbed as immigration and greater participation among native-born American workers swelled the labor force. Powell's speech at the Jackson Hole conference makes it less likely that we'll see layoffs pick up, but, consistent with prior policy easing cycles, the "low hiring" part of the current regime may well persist too, posing a conundrum for Fed officials as they seek to stabilize the labor market. Across corporate America, a disinflationary impulse is putting pressure on revenue growth, making it difficult to hire workers while maintaining profit margins. This is especially true for the discretionary goods sector where sell side analysts have been cutting their estimates of revenue growth for coming quarters, according to Bloomberg Intelligence. The Consumer Price Index shows that in core goods -- categories including home furnishings, clothing and automobiles -- prices on a year-over-year basis are falling faster than they have in 20 years. That's good news for consumers, but bad news for sellers of those products. For the housing industry, the Fed's rate cuts will come too late, as I wrote earlier this month. A weaker-than-expected peak selling season this spring meant companies tied to housing have pushed out expectations for a recovery until next year. They're unlikely to increase hiring until there's more evidence that buyers are responding to lower mortgage rates. The technology sector seems to be going through something akin to a jobless recovery despite the boom in investments related to artificial intelligence. Google parent Alphabet Inc.'s headcount has fallen slightly over the past year while capital expenditures surged 85%. Meta Platforms Inc., another big AI spender, has resumed net hiring over the past few quarters but at a much slower pace than in the 2010s. AI requires heavy spending on chips, servers and data centers but, for the moment, doesn't seem to need many people. The experience of 2002 also shows that even a meaningful pickup in economic activity and interest rate-sensitive industries next year won't guarantee an increase in hiring. Back then, the economy had exited recession, consumption growth was solid, residential property investment contributed 0.3% to real gross domestic product growth, and homebuilder confidence increased, but the overall hiring rate was flat. It took until the latter half of 2003 -- almost two years after the end of the 2001 recession -- for hiring to increase and for the unemployment rate to begin to decline. The tension in the labor market right now is that overall momentum is negative -- as seen in declining job openings and the hires rate and rising unemployment -- even though some measures such as jobless claims and layoffs continue to be low and stable. The Fed has enough room to cut interest rates and should be able to reverse that negative momentum eventually. Yet the prospects for a pickup in hiring over the next couple of quarters appear dim. Richmond Fed President Thomas Barkin speculated on Bloomberg's Odd Lots podcast recently that the current dynamic of low hiring and low firing is unsustainable. Until this stalemate is resolved with companies willing to increase headcount, the labor market isn't out of the woods.