4 Sources
[1]
Alarm over legal loophole as warped chatbots impersonate Jimmy Savile
Last week The Telegraph found digital avatars of Molly Russell and murdered teenager Brianna Ghey on Character.AI, a service where users create their own chatbots with customised personalities. The user-generated bots used images of Molly and Brianna, as well as biographical details of the
[2]
'A gut punch': Character.AI criticised over 'horrific' Brianna Ghey and Molly Russell chatbots
The NSPCC is warning an AI company that allowed users to create chatbots imitating murdered teenager Brianna Ghey and her mother pursued "growth and profit at the expense of safety and decency". Character.AI, which last week was accused of "manipulating" a teenage boy into taking his own life,
[3]
Character.AI Under Fire for Allowing Avatars of Deceased Teens on Platform
Charities have called for stricter regulation of the technology to protect young people. Character.AI has become embroiled in multiple controversies that raise questions over how well the platform safeguards young users. In one case, the mother of a 14-year-old boy who killed himself after
[4]
Digital clones of Brianna Ghey and Molly Russell created by 'manipulative and dangerous' AI
The mother of murdered teenager Brianna Ghey has branded a US tech start-up as "manipulative and dangerous" for allowing users to create a digital version of her late daughter. Esther Ghey called for fresh action to protect children online after The Telegraph found artificial intelligence (AI)
Share
Copy Link
Character.AI, a popular AI chatbot platform, faces criticism and legal challenges for hosting user-created bots impersonating deceased teenagers, raising concerns about online safety and AI regulation.

Character.AI, a popular artificial intelligence chatbot platform, has come under intense scrutiny for allowing users to create digital avatars impersonating deceased teenagers. The controversy has sparked outrage among families, charities, and regulators, raising serious questions about online safety and the need for stricter AI regulation
1
2
3
.The Telegraph's investigation uncovered user-generated chatbots on Character.AI that mimicked Brianna Ghey, a transgender teenager murdered in February 2023, and Molly Russell, who took her own life in 2017 after viewing self-harm content online. These bots used photographs and biographical details of the deceased teenagers, causing distress to their families
1
4
.Esther Ghey, Brianna's mother, condemned the platform as "manipulative and dangerous," calling for increased protection for children in the rapidly changing digital world
2
. Andy Burrows, representing the Molly Rose Foundation, described the discovery as a "gut punch," emphasizing the need for stronger regulation of both AI and user-generated content platforms2
.The controversy extends beyond these specific cases. Character.AI is currently facing a lawsuit from the family of Sewell Setzer, a 14-year-old from Florida who took his own life after extensive interactions with AI avatars on the platform
1
3
. This case has raised questions about the company's responsibility and the potential dangers of AI chatbots marketed to young users.The incidents have prompted discussions about potential loopholes in existing and upcoming regulations:
1
.1
.2
3
.Related Stories
Character.AI, which boasts over 20 million users, including teenagers as young as 13, has stated that it takes safety seriously. The company claims to have both proactive and reactive moderation systems in place
1
2
. However, the discovery of these controversial chatbots, along with others impersonating figures like Jimmy Savile and Josef Mengele, has called into question the effectiveness of these measures1
.This controversy highlights the complex challenges facing the AI industry, particularly in balancing innovation with ethical considerations and user safety. As AI technology becomes more sophisticated and accessible, the need for comprehensive regulation and industry-wide standards becomes increasingly apparent
1
2
3
.The incident serves as a stark reminder of the potential risks associated with user-generated AI content and the responsibility of platforms to implement robust safeguards, especially when their services are accessible to young and vulnerable users.
Summarized by
Navi
[2]
03 Sept 2025•Technology

22 May 2025•Policy and Regulation

12 Sept 2025•Policy and Regulation

1
Technology

2
Technology

3
Policy and Regulation
