2 Sources
2 Sources
[1]
Citrini Report Author Calls for AI Tax After Scare-Trade Selloff
Governments should consider taxing artificial intelligence to cushion the effects of sweeping job losses, according to Alap Shah, co-author of a Citrini Research report that warned about tech disruption and fueled an AI scare trade. The smarter AI gets, the more jobs it can replace, Shah, chief investment officer at Lotus Technology Management, said in a Bloomberg TV interview. A related hit to consumer spending would imperil the economy, he said, adding that governments should consider policies such as taxing incremental or windfall gains from AI. Shah sees chipmakers, data centers and foundation labs as main beneficiaries of the AI trade. At risk are intermediation businesses like insurers and banks. His firm had short positions in some of the companies cited in the report, he said, while owning "a lot" of semiconductor stocks poised to benefit. The AI "scare trade" rippled through markets on Monday after a weekend report from little-known Citrini Research warned about the technology's disruptive impact on the global economy. The note, which laid out hypothetical scenarios set in the future, highlighted food delivery and credit card companies as vulnerable -- spurring a selloff in delivery, payments and software stocks. The S&P 500 fell 1% while an exchange-traded fund focused on software tumbled 4.8%, bringing its drop from a peak in September to around 35% on concerns AI could cannibalize earnings. International Business Machines Corp. saw its worst drop in 25 years. Shah said he was surprised by the market reaction. "I thought there was going to be a small reaction -- it was definitely larger than we expected." The debate comes amid growing uncertainty over AI's impact on the labor market. While some fear mass-layoffs, others points to prior technological advances that have spawned new industries and jobs. Shah estimates AI could cut white-collar employment by 5% over the next 18 months. Over the next five years, these jobs in the US will be a key gauge of AI's effects, with the impact likely to show up fastest there given its dynamic labor market, he said. "It's much easier to fire folks than it is in other parts of the world," Shah added. In the near term, he expects further market swings, including in software companies, as traders assess the long-term impact from AI. "We are entering a really highly volatile time in the markets," he said.
[2]
Citrini Research flags AI 'ghost GDP' risk, calls for taxing windfall gains amid job disruption
Speaking to Bloomberg, co-author Alap Shah, chief investment officer at Lotus Technology Management, said governments should consider taxing incremental or windfall gains from AI to offset job losses triggered by automation. Artificial intelligence could inflate headline economic growth while masking deep labour disruption, according to a new report by Citrini Research. Speaking to Bloomberg, co-author Alap Shah, chief investment officer at Lotus Technology Management, said governments should consider taxing incremental or windfall gains from AI to offset job losses triggered by automation. The core warning from the research firm is a potential "ghost GDP" scenario where AI boosts productivity and corporate profits, lifting output on paper, even as wage growth and employment weaken beneath the surface. The report argues that without policy intervention, gains could accrue disproportionately to capital, widening inequality and straining fiscal systems. Shah added that the market reaction to the report was "definitely larger than we expected," underscoring investor sensitivity to second-order AI effects. Unlike earlier AI tools that augmented productivity, agentic systems can autonomously handle workflows across coding, legal documentation, research, customer service and even financial analysis. That shift, Shah argues, could compress labour demand across white-collar sectors far faster than markets currently anticipate. Shah suggested governments may eventually need to tax incremental or windfall gains from AI to cushion labour displacement. Agentic AI could be the biggest productivity unlock in decades but also the fastest labour substitution cycle in modern economic history.
Share
Share
Copy Link
A controversial report from Citrini Research sparked market turmoil after warning about AI's disruptive economic impact on jobs. Co-author Alap Shah estimates AI could eliminate 5% of white-collar employment within 18 months and proposes governments tax AI-generated windfall gains to cushion widespread job losses. The report triggered an AI scare trade that sent software stocks down 4.8%.
A weekend report from Citrini Research sent shockwaves through financial markets, sparking what traders are calling an AI scare trade that wiped billions off tech valuations. The S&P 500 fell 1% while software-focused exchange-traded funds tumbled 4.8%, extending their decline from September peaks to around 35%. International Business Machines Corp. experienced its worst single-day drop in 25 years as investors reassessed AI's disruptive economic impact
1
.The report, authored by Alap Shah, chief investment officer at Lotus Technology Management, laid out hypothetical scenarios highlighting food delivery, credit card companies, insurers, and banks as particularly vulnerable to automation. The market selloff caught even Shah by surprise. "I thought there was going to be a small reaction -- it was definitely larger than we expected," he told Bloomberg TV
1
.At the core of the Citrini Research analysis lies a troubling concept: "ghost GDP." This scenario describes how AI could inflate headline economic growth and boost corporate profits while wage growth and white-collar employment deteriorate beneath the surface
2
. The phenomenon represents a fundamental shift in how productivity gains translate to broader economic prosperity.
Source: ET
Shah estimates AI could eliminate 5% of white-collar employment over the next 18 months, with the United States serving as a key gauge due to its dynamic labor market. "It's much easier to fire folks than it is in other parts of the world," Shah noted, suggesting the impact will manifest fastest in American workplaces
1
. Over the next five years, tracking these job categories will prove critical to understanding widespread job losses caused by AI.What distinguishes current AI capabilities from earlier productivity tools is the emergence of agentic systems that can autonomously handle complete workflows. Unlike previous technologies that augmented human work, these systems independently manage coding, legal documentation, research, customer service, and financial analysis
2
. Shah characterizes this as potentially the biggest productivity unlock in decades, but also the fastest labor substitution cycle in modern economic history.
Source: Bloomberg
The implications extend beyond individual job losses. Shah warns that as AI replaces more jobs, the resulting hit to consumer spending would imperil the broader economy. Without policy intervention, gains could accrue disproportionately to capital rather than labor, widening inequality and straining fiscal systems
2
.Related Stories
In response to these projections, Shah advocates for governments to consider taxing incremental or windfall gains from AI. This approach would aim to cushion the effects of labor displacement and redistribute some of the economic benefits currently flowing primarily to technology companies and their investors
1
2
.Shah's firm has positioned itself accordingly, holding short positions in vulnerable intermediation businesses while owning "a lot" of semiconductor stocks. He identifies chipmakers, data centers, and foundation labs as the main beneficiaries of the AI trade, while traditional service sectors face mounting pressure
1
.Looking ahead, Shah expects continued market volatility as traders grapple with AI's long-term implications. "We are entering a really highly volatile time in the markets," he warned, anticipating further swings particularly in tech stocks and software companies
1
. The debate reflects growing uncertainty in the labor market, with competing narratives about whether AI will destroy jobs or spawn new industries as previous technological advances have done. The underscores investor sensitivity to second-order AI effects that extend beyond immediate productivity benefits to broader economic and social consequences.Summarized by
Navi
23 Feb 2026•Business and Economy

11 Nov 2025•Business and Economy
27 Oct 2025•Business and Economy

1
Technology

2
Technology

3
Policy and Regulation
